Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James Scott Marsden”
State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 52 In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc., &c., Appellant, v. James J. Breheny, &c., et al., Respondents. Monica L. Miller, for appellant. Kenneth A. Manning,
People v. Marsdenpublic domain
234 Cal.App.2d 796 (1965) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT BERNARD MARSDEN, Defendant and Appellant. Crim. No. 10097. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Four. June 7, 1965. Patrick Kerrigan, under appointment by the District Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, William E. James, Assi
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Marsden W. Miller, Jr., and William C. Huls, Cross-Appelleespublic domain
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Following the reversal by this Court of the mail fraud convictions of defendants-appellants Marsden W. Miller, Jr. (Miller) and William C. Huls (Huls) because the indictment and the jury instructions permitted the jury to convict without finding the deprivation of a property right, the government brought a new indictment. In this pretrial appeal, both Mil
SeaChange International, Inc. v. nCUBE Corp.public domain
313 F.Supp.2d 393 (2004) SEACHANGE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. NCUBE CORPORATION, Defendant. nCUBE Corporation, Counter-claimant v. Seachange International, Inc., Counter-defendant No. CIV.A.00-568-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. April 7, 2004. *394 William J. Marsden, Jr. and J. Andrew Huffman,
Bower v. Stein Eriksen Lodge Owners Ass'n, Inc.public domain
201 F.Supp.2d 1134 (2002) Christopher J. BOWER and Mary Lynne Perry, Plaintiffs, v. STEIN ERIKSEN LODGE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Utah non-profit corporation, Defendants. No. 2:99-CV-155C. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. May 3, 2002. *1135 *1136 Michael J. Kelley, Ja
Wesley-Jessen Corp. v. Pilkington Visioncare, Inc.public domain
863 F.Supp. 186 (1993) WESLEY-JESSEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PILKINGTON VISIONCARE, INC. and Pilkington Barnes-Hind Ltd., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-268-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. October 25, 1993. Robert K. Payson and William J. Marsden, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, DE, John O. Tramontine, Douglas J. Gilbert and Donald K. Reedy
SeaChange International, Inc. v. nCUBE Corp.public domain
115 F.Supp.2d 473 (2000) SEACHANGE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. NCUBE CORPORATION, Defendant. nCUBE Corporation, Counter-claimant, v. SeaChange International, Inc., Counter-defendant. Civil Action No. 00-568-JJF. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 29, 2000. *474 William J. Marsden, Jr., J. Andrew
693 F.Supp.2d 409 (2010) In re CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULE PATENT LITIGATION. No. 09-2118. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 12, 2010. *411 William J. Marsden, Jr., Esquire, Susan Morrison Coletti, Esquire and Jennifer Lynn Hall, Esquire of Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE, for Plaintif
74 S.E.2d 749 (1953) 237 N.C. 179 BOARD OF MANAGERS OF JAMES WALKER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF WILMINGTON v. CITY OF WILMINGTON et al. No. 594. Supreme Court of North Carolina. February 25, 1953. *754 Isaac C. Wright and Alton A. Lennon, Wilmington, for plaintiff, appellant. Wm. B. Campbell, Wilmington, f
Wesley-Jessen Corp. v. Pilkington Visioncare, Inc.public domain
OPINION McKELVIE, District Judge. This is a patent infringement case. In a complaint filed on June 8, 1993, Wesley-Jessen Corporation alleges Pilkington Vision-care, Inc. and Pilkington Barnes-Hind, Ltd. are infringing three of its patents for colored contact lenses and methods for making those lenses. The case is currently scheduled for a two week jury trial beginning on Monday, June 6, 1994.
Republic Insurance v. Sinclair Oil Corp.public domain
791 F.Supp. 278 (1992) REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION, a Wyoming corporation, Defendant. No. 91-C-1113-S. United States District Court, D. Utah, C.D. April 20, 1992. *279 Joy L. Clegg, Jerry D. Fenn, Jr., Snow, Christensen & Martineau, Salt Lake City, Utah, James C. La Forge, Charles K. O'N
People v. Jacksonpublic domain
Opinion BEDS WORTH, Acting P. J. —The trial judge in this case exercised uncommon common sense in a ruling that guaranteed defendant would not have to face the beggar’s crossroad of having to choose between revealing damaging information to the judge about to hear his bench trial or giving up his chance at a new attorney. This sagacity is assigned to
Wesley-Jessen Corp. v. Pilkington Visioncare, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION McKELVIE, District Judge. In this patent ease, Wesley-Jessen Corporation alleges Pilkington Visioncare, Inc. and Pilkington Barnes-Hind, Ltd. are infringing three of-its patents for colored contact lenses and methods for making those lenses. The defendants deny that they are infringing the patents, and allege as affirmative defenses that the patents are invalid and unenforceable. The pl
Bartel v. Charles Kurz & Co.public domain
.MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. This case was transferred in January 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”).
833 F.Supp. 437 (1993) MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Mobil Corporation, Mobil Chemical Company, Inc., Arthur C. Ferguson, Andrew U. Ferrari and Paul M. Herbst, Counterclaim Defendants. Civ. A. No. 92-351-JJF. United Sta
Thorn EMI North America, Inc. v. Intel Corp.public domain
928 F.Supp. 449 (1996) THORN EMI NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-199-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 28, 1996. *450 Josy W. Ingersoll, Martin S. Lessner, Lisa B. Goodman, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, Delaware; Donald F. Parsons,
Thorn EMI North America, Inc. v. Intel Corp.public domain
936 F.Supp. 1186 (1996) THORN EMI NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-199-RRM. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 29, 1996. *1187 *1188 Josy W. Ingersoll, Martin S. Lessner, and Lisa B. Goodman, Young, Conaway, Stargatt &a;
People v. Weisnerpublic domain
Filed 4/27/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- THE PEOPLE, C095039 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.
Houston v. Criderpublic domain
317 S.W.3d 178 (2010) Betty HOUSTON, Wayne Keathley, Leslie Marsden, Monica Keathley, Judy Payne, Janet McDowell, Dennis Smith, and Gary McDowell, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Sherry L. CRIDER and John L. Crider, Defendants-Appellants. No. SD 29879. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. July 20, 2010. *181 Joh
LeFeber v. Johnsonpublic domain
209 P.3d 254 (2009) 2009 MT 188 351 Mont. 75 James A. LeFEBER, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Maggie R. JOHNSON, a/k/a Margaret Rose Johnson, Respondent, Appellee, and Cross-Appellant. No. DA 08-0374. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs April 22, 2009. Decided May 27, 2009.