⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James T Garrison, II”

State v. Garrisonpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025-02-25 · Published · cited 0× · 230 Conn. App. 820
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
People v. Garrisonpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2014-05-29 · Published · cited 45× · 495 Mich. 362; 852 N.W.2d 45; 2014 Mich. LEXIS 1025
Viviano, J. This case involves two related statutory schemes: the William Van Regenmorter Crime Victim’s Rights Act (CVRA)1 and Michigan’s general restitution statute.2 The issue is whether these statutes authorize courts to order a defendant to pay restitution for the reasonable travel expenses that victims incur while securing their stolen property and attending restitut
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019-05-02 · Published · cited 46× · 923 F.3d 209
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. 1 *212 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts brought suit on October 6, 2017, to enjoin the enforcement of two federal Interim Final Rules (together, the "IFRs") promulgated by the United States Departments
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Carla Denise Garrison and Clint Garrison, Appellants/Respondents, v. Target Corporation, Respondent/Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000267 Appeal From Anderson County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5711 Heard May 15, 2019 – Filed January 15, 2020 AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED Joshua Thomas Hawkins and Helena LeeAnn Jedz
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2022-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Carla Denise Garrison and Clint Garrison, Petitioners- Respondents, v. Target Corporation, Respondent-Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2020-000523 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Anderson County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28080 Heard May 26, 2021 – Filed January 26, 2022 AFFIRMED AS MODIFIE
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-00503-COA ERICK GARRISON APPELLANT v. CARRIE COURTNEY APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/30/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES B. PERSONS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT,
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 4× · 322 F. Supp. 3d 1217
ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This products liability action arises from injuries Shannon Wayne Garrison sustained from the accidental discharge of his Ruger "Blackhawk" revolver. Following his accident, Garrison filed suit against Sturm, Ruger & Company (Ruger), the revolver's manufacturer, alleging negligence (Count I), breach of the Alabama Extended Manufacturers' Liability Doctrine (AEMLD) (Count II), breach
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-04-25 · Published · cited 24× · 888 F.3d 1057
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50137 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:11-cr-00922-DDP-6 DAVID JAMES GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Cali
District Court, D. Colorado · 2015-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 147 F. Supp. 3d 1173; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165059; 2015 WL 7982472
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Before the Court are seven motions seeking discovery from the Government and two motions attacking the indictment. For the reasons explained below, the Court denies, all of the discovery motions (either as moot, premature, or insufficiently supported). The Court reserves ruling on. the motions attacking the indictment in light o
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-02-02 · Published · cited 22× · 159 F. Supp. 3d 1044; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13118; 2016 WL 393527
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Re: Dkt. Nos. 110, 137, 138 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Greg Garrison (“Garrison”), Deborah Van Vorst (“Van Vorst”), and Sastry Hari (“Hari”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendant Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) for alleged violations of federal and Californi
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2016-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-16-00855-CV 14440815 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
U.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983-12-30 · Published · cited 0× · 18 M.J. 581; 1983 CMR LEXIS 687
OPINION OF THE COURT WOLD, Senior Judge: I Appellant was convicted on 28 May 1982 of simultaneous possession and sale of marijuana on 24 November 1981 and possession of marijuana on 5 December 1981. As to the sale offense, appellant raised the defense of entrapment.1 To rebut this defense the Government introduced, inter alia, testimony that, prior to
State v. Garrisonpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009-08-31 · Published · cited 5× · 292 S.W.3d 555; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203; 2009 WL 2712836
292 S.W.3d 555 (2009) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Landen E. GARRISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. SD 29406. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. August 31, 2009. Margaret M. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Appellant. *556 Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., James B. Farnsworth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jeffe
Garrison v. Burtpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011-03-08 · Published · cited 11× · 637 F.3d 849; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4487; 2011 WL 781219
637 F.3d 849 (2011) Howard Paul GARRISON, Appellant, v. Jerry BURT, Appellee. No. 10-1709. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: November 18, 2010. Filed: March 8, 2011. *851 Alfredo G. Parrish, argued, Des Moines, IA, for Appellant. Thomas William Andrews, AAG, argued, Des Moines, IA,
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006-03-31 · Published · cited 16× · 340 B.R. 180; 2006 WL 897842; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 541; 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 71
340 B.R. 180 (2006) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Avenue Special Situations Fund II, LP, DK Acquisition Partners, LP, RCG Carpathia Master Fund, Ltd., Rushmore Capital-I, L.L.C., and Rushmore Capital-II, L.L.C., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-16034 (AJG). Adversary No. 05-01029. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. March
District Court, S.D. New York · 1997-02-20 · Published · cited 29× · 955 F. Supp. 248; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1849; 1997 WL 76674
955 F.Supp. 248 (1997) Raymond P. HAYDEN; Racia Jame Newman; Alan S. Fishbone; David I. Samuels; Hyman Askowitz; Hill Rivkins, Carey, Loesberg, O'Brien & Mulray; Barry Tallering; Tartan Oil Corp.; J. Edwin Carey; Geraldine Bura, Executrix for the Estate of Mark Bura; Burton Trinkoff; Joseph Kandel; Miles R. Ingber; Nat Sorkin; Alan S. Loesberg; Vincent J. Ryan; State Realty Co.; Nathan L. Freedman; Antoinette M. Salinitro, Executrix for the Estate of
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005-11-17 · Published · cited 66× · 333 B.R. 205; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2218; 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 181; 2005 WL 3074189
333 B.R. 205 (2005) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Avenue Special Situations Fund II, LP, DK Acquisition Partners, LP, RCG Carpathia Master Fund, Ltd., Rushmore Capital-I, L.L.C., and Rushmore Capital-II, L.L.C., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01-16034 (AJG). Adversary No. 05-01029. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. Novem
Idaho Supreme Court · 2017-05-26 · Published · cited 8× · 162 Idaho 149; 395 P.3d 368; 2017 WL 2298448; 2017 Ida. LEXIS 143
*151 SUBSTITUTE OPINION, THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED April 28, 2017 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN. EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Ada County from a judgment dismissing the Plaintiffs action seeking to recover under an insurance policy for the loss of her house caused when a r
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024-12-30 · Published · cited 0×
FOURTH DIVISION MERCIER, C. J., DILLARD, P. J., and LAND, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules Decembe
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000-06-23 · Published · cited 26× · 770 A.2d 536; 2000 WL 875674; 2000 Del. Ch. LEXIS 86
770 A.2d 536 (2000) T. ROWE PRICE RECOVERY FUND, L.P., Carl Marks Management Co., L.P., Carl Marks Strategic Investments, L.P. and Carl Marks Strategic Investments II, L.P., individually and derivatively on behalf of Seaman Furniture Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. James RUBIN, M.D. Sass Associates, Inc., Resurgence Asset Management, L.L.C., M.D. Sass Corporate Resurgence Partners, L.P., M.D. Sass Corporate Resurgence International, Ltd., Robert Syming