Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jamie John-Crane”
Jamie Wilden v. Laury Transp.public domain
ROGERS, Circuit Judge. This Kentucky state-law products-liability case was brought on behalf of Janice T. Wilden and her young son, both of whom were involved in a serious traffic accident with an eighteen-wheel tractor-trailer. Janice Wilden suffered severe brain damage when her sedan was pulled beneath the side of the trailer in what is known as a "side-underride" crash. The only rema
State of Tennessee v. Jamie Crowellpublic domain
05/23/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMIE CROWELL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Chester County No. 15-CR-61 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge _______________________
California Crane School, Inc. v. National Commission for Certification of Crane Operatorspublic domain
Opinion KANE, Acting P. J.— INTRODUCTION California requires all crane operators to be certified. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 5006.1.) Respondent National Commission for Certification of Crane Operators (NCCCO) is the only nonunion certifying entity in the state. To be certified, applicants must pass NCCCO’s written and practical exams. NCCCO contracted with respondent International Assess
Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge In this qui tam action, plaintiff-relator Crystal Derrick ("relator") sues her former employer Roche Diagnostics Corporation, and its affiliate Roche Diabetics Care, Inc., (collectively "Roche" or the "Roche defendants"),1 along with Humana, Inc., and Humana Pharmacy, Inc., (collectively "Humana" or the "Humana defendants"), alleging that they viol
i i i i i i OPINION No. 04-09-00410-CV Jamie CRENSHAW, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. KENNEDY WIRE ROPE & SLING COMPANY and Newco Manufacturing Company, Inc., A
Berry v. American Standard, Inc.public domain
888 N.E.2d 740 (2008) Linnie Kathryn BERRY, on Her Own Behalf and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Howard L. Berry, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., American Water Works Service Company, Inc., Arkla Industries, Inc., Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, G.W. Berkheimer Company, Inc., Industrial Contractors, Inc., John Crane, Inc., Lennox Industries, Inc., Marathon Oil Company, Sealing Equipment Products Company,
State of Connecticut v. Health Net, Inc.public domain
LAND, District Judge: This appeal presents an issue of first impression in this Circuit: whether a state, after obtaining assignments from some of its citizens for claims that those citizens have under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461 (ERISA), has standing to assert those claims on behalf of its citizens in federal court. We conclude
Pinto v. Pintopublic domain
—In an action, inter alia, to set aside certain fraudulent conveyances, the defendants Nesim Pinto and Avram (Avi) Pinto, doing business as IJN Co., Inc., separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), dated December 4, 2001, which (1) granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to reargue and renew a prior motion determined in an order of the same court, dated September 8, 2000, and, upon reargument and renewal, amended t
Fuhrmann v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.public domain
SILVER, J. [¶ 1] Jamie Fuhrmann appeals from the entry of a summary judgment in favor of Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc., by the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) and the court’s dismissal of her claims against four individual supervisors, Christian Steppe, John LeMieux, Matthew Auger, and Annette Rodick, for whistleblower discrimination pursuant to the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act (WPA),
McQueen v. Jordan Pines Townhomes Owners Ass'npublic domain
2013 UT App 53 _________________________________________________________ THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ISAAC MCQUEEN, Plaintiff, Appellee, and Cross‐appellant, v. JORDAN PINES TOWNHOMES OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant, Appellant, and Cross‐appellee. Opinion No. 20110312‐CA Filed February
Young, T. v. Allied Signal, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT JOYCE M. STETTLER AND RAYMOND : No. 192 EAL 2014 J. STETTLER, H/W, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : v. : :
Wyly v. Integrity Insurance Solutionspublic domain
*904OPINION John Donovan, Justice Appellant Benson Scott Wyly appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of Integrity Insurance Solutions (“Integrity”). We reverse and remand. I. Background Appellant purchased a Glassair III aircraft in Bristol, Tennessee, that was to be transported to League City, Texas.
In re the Estate of Magnorpublic domain
—In a proceeding, inter alia, to settle the final account of James B. Magnor, Jr., and Robert Magnor, as co-trustees of a trust established by the will of James B. Magnor, deceased, Jamie E. Magnor appeals from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Radigan, S.), dated March 21, 2000, as granted the respective motions of James R. Magnor, Jr., and Robert Magnor, and of Kevin Healey, Patrick M. Healey, John Healey, Kenneth Heale
State v. Birdsheadpublic domain
#26987-aff in pt & rem in pt-LSW 2015 S.D. 77 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHARLES BIRDSHEAD, Defendant and Appellant. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVE
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG. This is an accelerated interlocutory appeal 1 from the trial court’s order granting class certification in a case involving allegations that appellant Stewart Title Guaranty Company (“STGC”) charged premiums for title insurance policies that exc
Carr v. Fischerpublic domain
283 F.Supp.2d 816 (2003) Jamie CARR, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, Respondent. No. 01-CV-6878. United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 9, 2003. *817 *818 Jamie Carr, pro se. Merri Turk Lasky, for defendant. *819 ORD
Bolin v. Harvard Protection Services, Inc.public domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Roland Camacho appeals from the September 27, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, entered after a jury verdict in favor of defendants on all of Camacho’s claims, including his principal claim of retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.
Ross v. Everhartpublic domain
185 S.W.3d 720 (2006) Jami Jo ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John David EVERHART, Sr., Brian Keith Everhart, Linda Schlax, and Glenda Metcalf, Defendants-Respondents. No. 26730. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. January 30, 2006. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied February 21, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied
R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy Vanderspublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CRIME VICTIMS R.S. AND S.E., Petitioners, v. HON. PETER A. THOMPSON, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Respondent Judge, TEDDY CARL VANDERS, Real Party in Interest.
Crenshaw v. Kennedy Wire Rope & Sling Co.public domain
327 S.W.3d 216 (2010) Jamie CRENSHAW, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. KENNEDY WIRE ROPE & SLING COMPANY and Newco Manufacturing Company, Inc., Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. 04-09-00410-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. June 30, 2010. *219 Timothy Patton, Timothy Patton, P.C., San Antonio, TX, Steve T. Hastings, Henry