Cases

USCA11 Case: 22-11103 Document: 38-1 Date Filed: 01/03/2024 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-11103 ____________________ MARCUS RAPER,

MEMORANDUM DECISION FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Pro se plaintiff Denise M. Hairston (“Hairston”) brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §.405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying the application of her minor daughter, S.N.

695 F.Supp.2d 1311 (2010) Melissa P. CHOQUETTE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 6:08-cv-2060-Orl-GJK. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 18, 2010. *1312 Bradley K. Boyd, Bradley K. Boyd, PA, Melbourne, FL, for Plaintiff. Susan R. Waldron, US Attorney's

658 F.Supp.2d 1340 (2009) Betty Ann DELKER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 6:08-cv-1074-Orl-31GJK. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 9, 2009. *1344 Richard A. Culbertson, Law Office of Richard A. Culbertson, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff. Susan R. Waldr

PER CURIAM: Leticia Medina appeals the district court’s order affirming the Social .Security Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. She challenges the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) on several grounds. First, she contends that the ALJ erred in failing to find that all of her impairments were severe. Second, she argues that the ALJ did not adequately explain why he gave lit

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff contests the denial of social security disability benefits that she sought because she is manic depressive (“bipolar,” in the current jargon) and disabled by her mental illness from holding gainful employment. Age 36 at the time of her hearing before the administrative law judge, she had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder more than a decade

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. The basic question we must answer in these consolidated appeals is whether assignments the Commissioner of Social Security made pursuant to the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 (the “Coal Act”), 26 U.S.C. SS 9701-9722 are unconstitutional pursuant to Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498, 118 S.Ct. 2131, 141 L.Ed.2d 451 (1998). The Com

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. Shenango, Inc., Stelco USA, Inc., Stelco Coal Co. and Mueller Industries (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Companies”) challenge the Commissioner of Social Security’s assignment of responsibility for health care premiums of approximately 70 retired miners and their qualified dependents pursuant to the

PER CURIAM: Josephine Foote appeals from a district court order granting judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) who denied Foote’s application for disability benefits under the Supplemental Security Income Program of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq. On appeal, Foote maintains that

307 F.3d 222 BERWIND CORPORATIONv.COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund; Michael H. Holland; William P. Hobgood; Marty D. Hudson; Thomas O.S. Rand; Elliot A. Segal; Carl E. Vanhorn; Gail R. Wilensky, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund; the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan; A. Frank Dunham, as Trustee of the United Mine Workers of America 199

Sterrett, Judge: Petitioner, the Church of Scientology of California (California Church or Church), was incorporated as a nonprofit corporation in the State of California in 1954. In 1957, respondent recognized petitioner as an organization described in section 501(c)(3)1 exempt from Federal income taxes under section 501(a). In 1967, respondent revoked petitioner’s tax-exempt

Matter of Elizabeth St. Garden, Inc. v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 03321) Matter of Elizabeth St. Garden, Inc. v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 03321 [42 NY3d 992] June 18, 2024 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

452 U.S. 18 (1981) LASSITER v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. No. 79-6423. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 23, 1981. Decided June 1, 1981. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA. *19 Leowen Evans argued the cause pro hac vice for petitio

SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT CARE AND PROTECTION OF EVE.[1] Docket: SJC-13672 Dates: February 7, 2025 - May 15, 2025 Present: Bu

Filed 3/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA RG21088725) et al., Defendants and Appellants, PROTECT APP-BASED DRI

Filed 4/12/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG21088725) STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,

21-2095 Perry v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2022 (Argued: February 7, 2023 Decided: August 25, 2023) Docket No. 21-2095 ____________________ CHAZ PERRY, WAYNE ASKEW, BRANDAN BASS, JAMES BEDDIA, FRANTZ BONNEAU,

22-7-cv Elisa W. v. City of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2022 (Argued: March 8, 2023 Decided: September 19, 2023) No. 22-7 _____________________________________ ELISA W.; ALEXANDRIA R., by her next friend, ALISON MAX ROTHSC

20-4238 Melendez v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-4238-cv MARCIA MELENDEZ, JARICAN REALTY INC., 1025 PACIFIC LLC, LING YANG, TOP EAST REALTY LLC, HAIGHT TRADE LLC, ELIAS BOCHNER, 287 7TH AVENUE REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX