Cases

52 Cal.App.4th 380 (1997) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ADRIAN GUTIERREZ, Defendant and Appellant. In re ADRIAN GUTIERREZ on Habeas Corpus. Docket Nos. E016015, E017122. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. January 28, 1997. *382 COUNSEL Steven Schorr, under appointment by the Court of

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY TU M. PHAM, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court by order of reference is defendants Jim’s Place, LLC and Costa B. Taras’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Second Motion to Compel Discovery, filed on October 16, 2014. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff Alfonso Lopez-Gomez (“Plaintiff”) filed his response in opposition on October 29, 2014. (ECF No. 4

271 P.3d 1082 (2012) STATE of Alaska, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Petitioner, v. Paul HEISEY, Respondent. No. S-13656. Supreme Court of Alaska. March 2, 2012. *1083 Jonathan A. Woodman, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, Janell M. Hafner, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel S. Sullivan, Attorney General, Juneau, for Petitio

WHATLEY, Judge. In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, the Husband, John Stanton, appeals a nonfinal order awarding the Wife, Susan Stanton, temporary alimony, child support, and attorney’s fees.1 The trial court awarded the Wife $75,000 per month in temporary support for her and the parties’ minor child and a total of $336,946.48 in temporary attorney’s fees and costs. We agree with the Hus

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: Pamela J. Hazelwood v. Keith L. Hazelwood Appellate case number: 01-17-00147-CV Trial court case number: 2015-49239 Trial court: 310th District Court of Harris County The clerk’s record was filed on April 7, 2017. Appellant has filed a motion to supplement the cler

[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2014-Ohio-4198.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99628 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. Granting in Part & Denying in Part the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs are former female employees of Ruth’s Chris Steak House who allege that they were subjected to gender discrimination by Defendants, Ruth’s Chris and other rela

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 50491 In Re: Certification of Question of Law. ) ----------------------------------------------- ) MYLES DAVIS, an individual, and ) JANELLE DAHL, an individual, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) Boise, September 2023 Term

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. On February 16, 2012, Magistrate Judge Jennifer Boal issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that this Court dismiss the plaintiffs’ federal claims and decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pendant state-law claims. This Court finds the R & R to be thorough and well-reasoned and, accordingly, accepts and adopts it in

637 F.Supp.2d 406 (2009) Carol A. TOBIN, Individually and as the Special Administratrix of the Estate of William F. Tobin, Meggan Van Ness, and Kelly Bear, Plaintiffs, v. AMR CORPORATION, American Airlines, Inc., and American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Defendants. No. 3:08-cv-00697-M. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. July 8, 2009.

[Cite as State v. Thompson, 2014-Ohio-202.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99628 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZOBEL, District Judge. Based upon a careful and exhaustive analysis of the facts and the applicable law of this exhausting case, the Magistrate Judge recommends allowance of defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs object to the entirety of the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket # 173); defendants only ob

102 S.W.3d 162 (2003) Tarita JAMES, Appellant. v. The STATE of Texas, State. Nos. 2-00-392-CR, 2-00-393-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. January 9, 2003. Rehearing Overruled March 13, 2003. *167 Campion and Campion and Alex Joseph Scarff, San Antonio, for Appellant. Janelle M. Haverkamp, Cooke Co

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 18, 2014, Tanya Vasserman filed this putative class action in Los Ange-les Superior Court against Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital (“Newhall Memorial”) and various fictitious defendants, alleging violations of state wage and hour laws’.1 Ne

For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS LIMETREE BAY TERMINALS, LLC, ) S. Ct. Civ. No. 2023-0045 Appellant/Defendant, ) Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 301/2022 (STX) ) v. ) ) VINCENT LIGER, ) Appellee/Plainti

100 Cal.Rptr.2d 70 (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 784 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lionel Andrew SCOTT, Defendant and Appellant. Nos. D033131, D033902. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. September 12, 2000. Review Denied January 10, 2001. *73 Steven Schorr, San Diego, under

858 F.Supp. 1051 (1994) Laura Ann TROIANI, Petitioner, v. Susan POOLE, Warden, Respondent. No. 92-0314-IEG. United States District Court, S.D. California. June 2, 1994. *1052 *1053 Daniel E. Lungren, Atty. Gen., George Williamson, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary W. Schons, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., G

*136Opinion HUFFMAN, Acting P. J. In this third appeal from Richard Allen Mitchell’s judgment and sentence, we conclude that even in the wake of Monge v. California (1998) 524 U.S. 721 [118 S.Ct. 2246, 141 L.Ed.2d 615] and People v. Monge (1997) 16 Cal.4th 826 [66 Cal.Rptr.2d 853, 941 P.2d 1121], where the government has had a f

494 F.Supp.2d 811 (2007) Alvin L. KINTNER, Plaintiff, v. ALDI, INC., Defendant. No. C-3-02-492. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. July 6, 2007. *812 John F. Marchal, Marchal & Brown, Greenville, OH, Gary Lee Brown, for Plaintiff. Patrick McCaffrey, Jr., Jeffery Scott Maynard, Brenner Brown Goli

47 Cal.3d 798 (1989) 765 P.2d 493 254 Cal. Rptr. 331 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DONALD JOSEPH McFARLAND, JR., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S003612. Supreme Court of California. January 9, 1989. *800 COUNSEL Peter W. Cowan, under appointment by the Supreme