Cases

11/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 9, 2024 Session JANET DOE V. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003516-14 Gina C. Higgins, Judge No. W2023-01248-COA-R9-CV Shor

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOLLOWING TRIAL1 MARC BARRECA, Bankruptcy Judge. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On July 10, 2009, several banks commenced an involuntary Chapter 7 bank*584ruptcy against the debtor, Michael R. Mastro (“Mastro”). On August 21, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court (the “Court”) entered an Order

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

BROWN, J. A ¶ 1. group of neighborhood citi*545zens appeals from a circuit court certiorari review upholding the grant of a conditional use permit (CUP) for the creation and operation of a public museum at Black Point Estate, a historic residence located on Geneva Lake. The neighbors contend that the Wal-worth County Land Management Committee erred as a matter of law by f

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *534 Maranda ODonnell and other plaintiffs (collectively, "ODonnell") brought a class action suit against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges, 1 Hearing O

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RONALD E. BUSH, United States Magistrate Judge. Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ Second Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 141). The Court has carefully reviewed the record, considered oral arguments, and now enters the following Order granting, in part, and denying, in part, Defendants’ Motion.

559 F.3d 1345 (2009) Triantafyllos TAFAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Smithkline Beecham Corporation (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Smithkline Beecham PLC, and Glaxo Group Limited (doing business as GlaxoSmithKline), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants

944 F.Supp. 1478 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Timothy James McVEIGH and Terry Lynn Nichols, Defendants. Criminal Action No. 96-CR-68-M. United States District Court, D. Colorado. September 25, 1996. *1479 *1480 *1481 Patrick Ryan, U.S. Att

ORDER Upon consideration of the court’s July 28, 2009, 831 Fed.Appx. 748, order granting the parties’ joint motion for a stay of en banc proceedings, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Absent further order of this court, the appellants’ additional en banc brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. Absent further order of this court, the parties shall file the required copies of

ORDER Upon consideration of the court’s July 28, 2009, 831 Fed.Appx. 748, order granting the parties’ joint motion for a stay of en banc proceedings, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Absent further order of this court, the appellants’ additional en banc brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. Absent further order of this court, the parties shall file the required copies of

577 F.3d 1083 (2009) Frank Joseph MATYLINSKY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael BUDGE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 08-15459. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 2009. Filed August 18, 2009. *1088 Franny A. Forsman and John C. Lambrose, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Las

197 Wis.2d 855 (1995) 541 N.W.2d 803 Ronald and Jeanna KINNICK, Glenn and Candy Czaikowski, Ruth Lish; Lucille Stodola, Art and Ethel Gregg, Duane Hamm, Eugene and Diane Hollar, and Marvin, Barb and Amy Lynn Krayecki, Plaintiffs, v. SCHIERL, INC., f/k/a Schierl Oil and Heating, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Defendant-Co-Appellant, WISCONSIN CENTRAL, LTD., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, David SEIDL, d/b/a

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRANK JOSEPH MATYLINSKY,  No. 08-15459 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  3:03-CV-00497- MICHAEL BUDGE, LRH-RAM Respondent-Appellee.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court

990 F.Supp. 1337 (1998) James PETERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRANTS GROCERY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-D-940-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 5, 1998. *1338 John Q. Somerville, Lightfoot, Franklin & White, L.L.C., Birmingham, AL, R. Jack Drake, Frederick T. Kuykendall, II

57 F.Supp.2d 1268 (1999) James PETERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 96-D-940-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. June 21, 1999. *1269 *1270 *1271 John Q. Somerville, Lightfoot, Frankl

Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 05127) Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2022 NY Slip Op 05127 Decided on September 1, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published

254 Wis.2d 538 (2002) 2002 WI App 111 648 N.W.2d 878 Lyn and Stephen SILLS, Steve and Michelle Glasgow, John and Janet Harding, Hayden and Helene Leason, William and Sheila Groden, Brian and Marilyn Grant, Donald and Denise Sheldon, George and Susan Gootsan, Arthur and Mary Ann Langas, Karen and Richard Eagan, Martha and Andrew Belknap, Margaret Newell, Fred Knutsen, Karen Dulla Sitkowski, Donna and Michael

722 A.2d 73 (1998) 124 Md. App. 288 Stephanie SCHAEFER v. Michael CUSACK. No. 880, Sept. Term, 1997. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 30, 1998. *74 Paul A. Dorf and Russell G. Alion, Jr. (F. Kirk Kolodner and Adelberg, Rudow, Dorf, Hendler & Sameth, L.L.C., on the brief), Baltimore, for A

981 S.W.2d 495 (1998) FIRST GENERAL REALTY CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., Appellees. No. 03-97-00580-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. November 30, 1998. *496 Ronald D. Wren, Bedford, for Appellants. Barry Bishop, Clark, Thomas & Winters, Austin, for Appellees. Before

ORDER DE MENT, District Judge. This cause is now presented to the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed December 2, 1997, Defendants’ objections thereto, filed December 15, 1997 and January 2,1998, and Plaintiffs’ responses thereto, filed December 22,1997. The court has carefully read the Magistrate’s Recommendation and considered the objections of couns