Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Janice Denise Falls”
Medical Mutual of Ohio v. Denise Desoto Jose Desotopublic domain
234 F.3d 298 (6th Cir. 2000) Medical Mutual of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Denise deSoto; Jose deSoto, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 99-3988; 00-3571 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: September 21, 2000Decided and Filed: November 30, 2000 Appeal from the United States District Court for
Samuel v. County of Nassaupublic domain
Samuel v County of Nassau (2025 NY Slip Op 05005) Samuel v County of Nassau 2025 NY Slip Op 05005 Decided on September 17, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Martinez v. Nader Enters., LLCpublic domain
Martinez v Nader Enters., LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 00655) Martinez v Nader Enters., LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 00655 Decided on February 5, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia
Filasky v. Andover Cos.public domain
Filasky v Andover Cos. (2024 NY Slip Op 04545) Filasky v Andover Cos. 2024 NY Slip Op 04545 Decided on September 25, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Pricepublic domain
The opinion of- the court was delivered by Beier, J.: This is an original quo warranto action filed by the Attorney General’s office on behalf of the State to enjoin what is alleged to be unauthorized practice of law by Respondents David Martin Price, Janice Lynn King, Rosemary Denise Price, and Pro *390Se Advocates, an association in whose name they d
State of Iowa v. Patrick Edouardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0128 Filed February 10, 2016 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. PATRICK EDOUARD, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marion County, Paul R. Huscher, Judge. Patrick Edouard appeals the trial court’s determination that the confidential medical record
Dickerson v. Thompsonpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Peters, J.P Plaintiff and defendant, residents of New York, entered into a civil union in Vermont in April 2003. In November 2007, plaintiff, unable to obtain a dissolution of the civil union in Vermont due to that state’s residency requirements (see Vt Stat Ann, tit 15, §§ 592, 1206), commenced the instant action for equitable and declaratory relief seeking a judgment dissol
Porterfield v. Audubon Indem. Co.public domain
United States District Judge Ira DeMent, acting pursuant to Rule 18, Ala.R.App.P., certified to this Court the following question of law, the answer to which he anticipates will be dispositive of a case pending before him: "Does the pollution exclusion clause contained in Audubon's comprehensive general liability insurance policy preclude coverage to its insured for liability for injuries allegedly caused from the ingestion of lead contained in paint, blinds, water
LoBiondo v. Schwartzpublic domain
970 A.2d 1007 (2009) 199 N.J. 62 James LOBIONDO, Jr. and Denise LoBiondo, Individually and t/a D. LoBi Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Grace SCHWARTZ, Janice DeMarco, Karen Schwartz and Marilyn Kallareou, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents/Appellants, v. Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C., Michele A. Querques, Esq. and Steven Berlin, Esq., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
City of Gulfport v. McHughpublic domain
38 So.3d 674 (2010) CITY OF GULFPORT, Mississippi, Appellant v. Gregory McHUGH; Tammy McHugh; Mary Batchelor, Deceased; Mary L. Mohler; Jim Batchelor, Son of Mary Batchelor; James Athanaelos; Patricia A. Drake; Dr. Geddes B. Flagg; Nona McDonnell Flagg; Janice Toon Norman; Bruce Norman; Betty Toon Collins; Frank Collins; Philip W. Shaw, Jr.; and Betty Shaw, Appellees. No. 2009-CA-00244-COA. Court of Ap
Sokolsky v. Eidelmanpublic domain
OPINION BY MUNDY, J.: Appellant, Janice L. Sokolsky (“Sokol-sky”), appeals from the September 18, 2013 order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Edward R. Eidelman, Esquire and Eidelman Crossley, LLC (collectively “the Attorneys”), and dismissing her cause of action. After careful review, we reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. The trial cou
Schmitt v. Smithpublic domain
118 S.W.3d 348 (2003) Joan C. SCHMITT v. James Charles SMITH. In re S. Denise McCrary v. Joan Carol Schmitt. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. April 8, 2003 Session. October 30, 2003. *350 Mitzi C. Johnson and Kay Farese Turner, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, S. Denise McCrary. James F. Schaeffer,
Judith Henry v. Essex Countypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-1987 JUDITH HENRY v. ESSEX COUNTY; DETECTIVE LEONARD JACKSON, in his individual and official capacity; DETECTIVE DIANE MUNOZ, in her individual and official capacity; SHERIFF OFFICER JOSEPH DENEQUOLO, in his individual and official capacity; SHERIFF OFFICER JANICE GUY, in her indiv
Medical Mutual of Ohio v. DeSotopublic domain
KENNEDY, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court, in which MERRITT, *564Judge, joined. GILMAN, Judge (pp. 575-77), delivered a separate concurring opinion. AMENDED OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. This Employee Retirement Insurance and Security Act (ERISA) action comes before the court on the consolidated appeals of defendants, De
418 F.3d 372 In re: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATIONMike Cockrell, et al., Sandra S. Sorrell, et al., Robert Shoemaker, et al., Lisa Phelps-Dorris, et al., Claudia Edwards, et al., Jennifer Legg, et al., Angela Martin, et al., Mary Killebrew, et al., Teresa Russum, et al., Eileen Turner, et al., Janice McCrory, et al., Mitzi M. Wilson, et al., Barbara A. Geisert, et al., Pamela G. Ellison, et a
Boland v. Crum (In Re Brown)public domain
363 B.R. 591 (2007) In re Daniel Edward BROWN, and Shirley Ann Brown, Debtors. Thomas E. Boland, Plaintiff, v. Darcy M. Crum, Joseph V. Womack, Richard J. Samson, William M. Kebe, Jr., Ross P. Richardson, Gary S. Deschenes, Donald W. Torgenrud, Jr., Robert G. Drummond, Daniel Edward Brown, Shirley Ann Brown, James A Patten, Sharon R. Pruitt, Earl D. Pruitt, Laura J. Sandstrom, Clayton J. Arceneaux, Kenneth Johnson, Brandi L. Hazen, Gayle Ride
State v. Lesnickpublic domain
Broderick, J. The defendant, Denise Lesnick, was convicted of second degree murder. See RSA 630:1-b (1986). On appeal, she argues that the Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) erred in admitting evidence of prior bad acts under New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 404(b) and in failing to restrict certain cross-examination of a defense witness. We affirm. I In the early morning of Septem
Corner Stone Funeral Chapel, Inc. v. MVMG, LLCpublic domain
BRYAN, Justice. Corner Stone Funeral Chapel, Inc. (“Corner Stone”), appeals from a judgment ordering a receiver to transfer the assets of a cemetery business to MVMG, LLC, a competitor of Corner Stone’s. We affirm. Mountain View Memory Gardens & Mausoleum, Inc. (“the corporation”), owned a cemetery in Rainsville known as Mountain View Memory Gardens and Mausoleum (“the cemetery”). The corporation sold “p
Memorandum Opinion Granting in Part Creditor’s Objection to Debtors’ Homestead Exemption, Granting Judgment to Creditor on its §§ 727(a)(2) and (a)(4)(A) Claims, and Denying Creditor’s Claim under § 727(a)(5) Janice Miller Karlin, United States Chief Bankruptcy Judge The creditor’s claims in this case are not unusual; Creditor Holley Performance Products, Inc. (hereafter “Creditor”) objects to Debtors’ ho
Lemke v. Lemkepublic domain
DYKMAN, J. ¶ 1. Lisa Lemke appeals a 2011 amended divorce judgment which changed a 2007 award of family support to an award of child support with no maintenance. She asserts that the trial court's finding that she failed to show a substantial change of circumstances between her divorce trial and a hearing three years later was clearly erroneous. She also asserts that there was no evidence supporting the trial court's finding that