Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Janice L Schrager”
Issen v. GSC Enterprises, Inc.public domain
538 F.Supp. 745 (1982) Phillip ISSEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Derivatively on behalf of GSC Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GSC ENTERPRISES, INC., the Bank of Lincolnwood Steinway Drug Company, Ford Hopkins Company, Richard Goodman, Samuel Bergman, Egmont Sonderling, Walter Goodman, Erwin Horwitz, Mason Loundy, Raymond Eiden, Edward Gorenstein, Marshall D. Lieb and Haig Pedian, Defendants. Seymour ABRAMS,
Issen v. GSC Enterprises, Inc.public domain
508 F.Supp. 1298 (1981) Phillip ISSEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Derivatively on behalf of GSC Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GSC ENTERPRISES, INC., The Bank of Lincolnwood, Steinway Drug Company, Ford Hopkins Company, Richard Goodman, Samuel Bergman, Egmont Saunderling, Walter Goodman, Erwin Horwitz, Mason Loundy, Raymond Eiden, Edward Gorenstein, Marshall D. Lieb and Haig Pedian, Defendants. Seymour ABRA
Underwood v. City of Chicagopublic domain
2023 IL App (1st) 211317 SIXTH DIVISION December 1, 2023 No. 1-21-1317 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT MICHAEL W. UND
Underwood v. City of Chicagopublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 231132 FIFTH DIVISION February 28, 2025 No. 1-23-1132 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT Appeal from the Circ
Issen v. GSC Enterprises., Inc.public domain
508 F.Supp. 1278 (1981) Phillip ISSEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Derivatively on behalf of GSC Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. GSC ENTERPRISES, INC., The Bank of Lincolnwood, Steinway Drug Company, Ford Hopkins Company, Richard Goodman, Samuel Bergman, Egmont Saunderling, Walter Goodman, Erwin Horwitz, Mason Loundy, Raymond Eiden, Edward Gorenstein, Marshall D. Lieb and Haig Pedian, Defendants. Seymour ABRA
In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litigationpublic domain
*67MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: ATTORNEYS’ FEES — PRIVATE PLAINTIFFS and “MINORITY” STATES McGLYNN, District Judge. In Kramer v. Scientific Control Corporation, 534 F.2d 1085 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Kramer, 429 U.S. 830, 97 S.Ct. 90, 50 L.Ed.2d 94 (1976), our Court of Appeals,