Cases

526 F.Supp.2d 1094 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Jose Antonio JARAMILLO-AYALA, Defendant. No. CRIM. 05CR1963J. United States District Court, S.D. California. August 24, 2007. *1095 Karen P. Hewitt, United States Attorney, and Valerie Chu, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, for the Plaintiff United State

515 F.Supp.2d 292 (2007) Giulia JARAMILLO, Plaintiff, v. PROFESSIONAL EXAMINATION SERVICE, INC. and Stephen B. Carragher, Defendants. No. 3:06cv1263 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 15, 2007. *293 John R."Williams, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff. Andrew C. Ryan, Michael J. Rye, Cantor & Colbur

914 S.W.2d 246 (1996) James BURGESS, Appellant, v. Maria Lourdes JARAMILLO a/k/a Mary Lou Jaramillo, Appellee. No. 02-95-158-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. January 11, 1996. Rehearing Overruled February 15, 1996. *247 Terry S. Boone, Betty S. Springer, Haynes and Boone, Fort Worth, for Appellant.

Titone, J. This is an appeal by the defendants from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered November 5, 1975 in Nassau County, which denied their motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint, which seeks a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, on the grounds, inter alia, of lack of standing, failure to exhaust administrative remedies and failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed August 29, 2014, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [#1],1 filed July 8, 2015, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401, et seq, I h

ORDER R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision denying claimant Rico A. Gonzales’s application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. Jurisdiction is proper under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For the reasons explained below, the Court reverses and remands the Commissioner’s decision. I. Standard of Review.</

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed August 1, 2014, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. I ha

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Sam A. Crow, United States District Senior Judge In May 2012, plaintiff fifed applications for social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. These applications alleged a disability onset date of May-10, 2012. On November 4, 2013, a hearing was conducted upon plaintiffs applications. The administrative law judge (ALJ) considered the evidenc

344 F.Supp.2d 723 (2004) Julie A. SALAZAR, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CIV.03-1235 RLP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. November 3, 2004. *724 Patricia W. Glazek, Santa Fe, NM, for Julie E Salazar, plaintiff. Cynthia L Weisman, U.S. Attorney's

ORDER John E. 'Jones III, United States District Judge AND NOW, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn (Doc. 24), recommending that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiffs social security disability insurance be vacated and the case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security to develop the record fully, co

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered March 8, 2012 in a divorce action. The judgment, among other things, ordered defendant to pay spousal maintenance to plaintiff. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating from the eighth decretal paragraph the language “until Plaintiff reaches the age

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered March 8, 2012 in a divorce action. The judgment, among other things, ordered defendant to pay spousal maintenance to plaintiff. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating from the eighth decretal paragraph the language “until Plaintiff reaches the age

Appellate Case: 22-9580 Document: 010111008946 Date Filed: 03/04/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 4, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 887 CA 12-01799 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. KATHERINE ZUFALL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KARL ZUFALL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) JOAN WARREN, BUFFALO (JAMES P. RENDA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF COUNSE

Opinion by JUDGE TERRY {1 Defendant, Donald Wayne Bertrand, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of sexual assault. Defendant was convicted of sexual assault under section 18-3-402(1)(b), C.R.S.2014, after the jury was given an incorrect instruction dealing with whether the alleged victim was able to appraise the nature of her conduct because she was a

MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. In this Section 1983 civil rights action, Plaintiff has sued two Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission officers, the Sheriff of Adams County, Pennsylvania, and a Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas judge for various alleged violations of his constitutional rights1 arising out of a series of events that occurred after Plaint

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are sixteen Kentucky Medicaid enrollees who brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 - 706, challenging the federal government's approval of a new Kentucky Medicaid program, Kentucky HEALTH. Defendants-the Department o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RONNIE MAURICE STEWART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-152 (JEB) ALEX M. AZAR II, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs are sixteen Kentucky Medicaid enrollees who brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-70

Filed 7/31/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOSE ROBLES, Plaintiff and Appellant, A148803 v. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT (Alameda County DEPARTMENT et al., Super. Ct. No. RG1