Cases

IRVING, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. A Yazoo County jury convicted Julian Sims of gratification of lust, kidnapping, statutory rape, and sexual battery. The circuit court sentenced Sims as a habitual offender to fifteen years for the gratification-of-lust conviction, thirty years for the kidnapping conviction, thirty years for the statutory-rape conviction, and thirty years for the sexual-battery conviction, with

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Steven O. Dale, Acting Commissioner, FILED West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles, November 21, 2014 Petitioner Below, Petitioner RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

03/22/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN ALLEN FLEMING Appeal from the Criminal Court for Campbell County No. 16-654 E. Shayne Sexton, Judge No. E2016-01746-CCA-R3-CD

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/13/2024 09:08 AM CST - 628 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports IN RE ESTATE OF JEFFRES Cite as 32 Neb. App. 628 In re Estate of Eugene W. Jeffres,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID G. DONOVAN, Hanford No. 22-35474 Security Police Officer; CODY ALMQUIST; KORA BALES; D.C. No. DOUGLAS ANDERSON; JESS 4:21-cv-05148- BEAN; JEFF AHLERS; CYRUS TOR ANDERSON; DANIEL BEAM; TAIN BALLANTYNE; CHRISTOPHER J. HALL, Hanford OPINION Security Police Officer; JARED BETKER; DAYNNA COFFEY ARDAMICA; THOMAS R. ARDAMICA, Safety Bases Compli

[Cite as Doors On-Line v. Chandra, 2023-Ohio-2018.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SHELBY COUNTY DOORS ON-LINE INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 17-22-11 v. ROHIT CHANDRA, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Sidney Municipal Court

705 F.Supp.2d 1276 (2010) Mark PLASCENCIA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ST. GEORGE, St. George Police Department and Jared Taylor, Defendants. Case No. 2:07-CV-2 TS. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. March 9, 2010. *1279 S. Clark Newhall, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff. Bret W. Rawson, Peter Stirba, Stir

554 F.3d 870 (2009) Dale GROSS; James Bagwill; Laveta Barker; Billy Barnes; Jim Bennett; Roy Bergeron; Kenneth Bevenue; Cody Calico; Helen Capehart; Alma Cheshewalla; Raymond Cody; O W Collins; Chris Couch; Samuel Dobson; Gina Doss; Jason Drake; Allen Farrier; Kelly Fetzer; Eugene Fitzpatrick; Billy Gambling; Eros Garcia; Christopher Green; Wade Green; Mikey Grider; James Grisham; Tim Hansen; Darrin Hargis; Anthony Hayes; Paul Henry; Mark Hicks; Rhonda H

264 P.3d 640 (2011) Vance ADAMS, Shane L. Allen, Richard A. Allison, Sean Andrews, Isaac Banks, Kenneth Batts, John Bowen, Harold Brantley, Roy D. Buck, Ronald Buzzard, Jr., Patrick Calf Robe, Israel Chavez, Brandon Lee Clary, Robin B. Combs, Sr., David Cooper, Robert Dermates, Daniel Diaz, Phillip Dixon, Justin Dougherty, Wesley Fair, Jose Fernandez, Thomas G. Gallegos, Roy Gibbens, Oliver Giller, Donald Gilliland, Jeff Gillis, Zelo Goings, Mwamba H. Go

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NOS. 20, 21, 23, 25, 32, and 46) and DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF NO. 22) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 20, 21, 23, 25, 32, 46) and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Company (“State Farm”) filed resp

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiffs Ivamae Green (“Green”), Fitzroy Barnes, Fatima Barnes, and Eus-tace Barnes (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)1 *275bring this Action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York State law, alleging that Defendants Sergeant Glenn Scott (“Scott”), ‘ Sergeant Chris Gallagh

Opinion VOROS, Judge: 1 Samuel Joseph Hoffmann appeals from a district court order denying his motion to suppress drugs, drug paraphernalia, and a handgun seized during a warrant search of his apartment. We affirm., BACKGROUND 1 1 2 This case began, like many others, with an informant's tip. The informant told police about drug sales "in exchange for a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A. JOE FISH, Senior United States District Judge Before the court is the motion of the plaintiffs, ADT LLC and ADT U.S. Holdings, Inc. (together “ADT”), for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons stated below, the plaintiffs’ motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background ADT prov

Opinion of the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This patent litigation arises under the Hatch-Waxman Act, 21 U.S.C. § 355, whereby producers of generic pharmaceutical products are authorized to challenge the patent status of a federally registered and approved d

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Suppress Evidence filed by Defendant Nathaniel J. Winn on November 14, 2014 (Doc. 21). Winn seeks to suppress the evidence obtained by law enforcement officers from his cell phone. The motion has been fully briefed by the parties (Docs. 21, 22, 27, 30). The Court heard oral arguments and accepted

MAUS, Judge. Count I of an information charged the defendant committed rape by having sexual intercourse with R.J.L. who was less than 14 years of age and to whom he was not married. § 566.030,3. Count II of that information charged the defendant committed sodomy by having deviate sexual intercourse with R.J.L. § 566.060.3. A jury found him guilty of each count. The trial court sentenced him to imprisonment for 10 years upon

Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge Although the Court scheduled the hearing on December 5, 2018 to address Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the parties agreed that the question of injunctive relief should be consolidated with a final ruling on the merits of the action. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), this Decision and Order will be accompanied by a final judgment in favor of Defendants.

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 100–145 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________