Cases

McFadden, Presiding Judge. This appeal challenges a trial court order granting a motion to intervene in the underlying action. Because the movant has an independent remedy to protect its interests, it should not have been allowed to intervene over the appellants' objections. So we reverse. 1. Facts and procedural posture. On Au

SILVER, J. [¶ 1] Jennifer Edmondson appeals from an order of the Androscoggin County Probate Court (Dubois, J.) denying her petition for a formal adjudication of intestacy and for appointment as personal representative of the estate of her mother, Ruth E. O’Brien-Hamel. Jennifer contends that the Probate Court abused its discretion in permitting Donald F. Ham

BENTON, J. Elizabeth Anne O’Brien appeals the summary, declaratory, partial1 final judgment ruling that she had no right to proceeds of her uncle Calvin L. Todd, Jr.’s life insurance policy. The trial court concluded that the late Mr. Todd had, in compliance with the policy’s terms, substituted his younger daughter for his niece as a beneficiary some years before he died. We affirm.

MEMORANDUM** Edward Michael O’Brien appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his action alleging that defendants conspired to violate antitrust laws by sending him unsolicited e-mail messages. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim. Gompper v. VISX, Inc., 298 F.3d 893, 895 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

PER CURIAM: * Appellant challenges the grant of summary judgment against her sex discrimination claims, while the employer cross-appeals the denial of attorneys’ fees requested pursuant to Texas law. We AFFIRM the district court’s judgment on the merits but REVERSE and REMAND for further consideration of the attorneys’ fees request. Background Lucas Associa

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  HILARY O'BRIEN,   Appellant,  WD83197 v. 

Newell, J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which Keller, PJ., Hervey, Richardson and Keel, JJ., joined. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion. Yeary, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Walker, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Yeary, J., joined. KEASLER, J., dissented. A person engages in "organized criminal activity" if, with the intent to participate in a crime ring, the person commits or conspires to commit one or more of variou

[Cite as Norman v. O'Brien, 2016-Ohio-5499.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Redan R. Norman, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 16AP-191 (C.P.C. No. 15CV-10711) v. : (ACCELERATED

JOAN A. LENARD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.'s ("Defendant" or "Norwegian") Motion for Summary Judgment, ("Motion," D.E. 42), filed June 16, 2017. Plaintiff Stephen Emmet O'Brien filed a Response on July 8, 2017, ("Response," D.E. 52), to which Defendant filed a Reply on June 17, 2017, ("Reply," D.E. 54). Upon review of the Motion, Response, Reply, and t

OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice Appellant Kelvin Lynn O’Brien appeals from his felony-conviction for engaging in organized criminal activity. See Tex, Penal- Code Ann. § 71.02 (West 2014),' Kelvin contends that the jury charge improperly permitted conviction ‘ without jury unanimity and improperly instructed the jury regarding an uncha

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 22, 2013 at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES SCOTT O’BRIEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Robertson County No. 2009-CR-595 Michael R. Jones, Judge No. M2012-02397-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 27, 2013 The defendant, James Scott O’Brien, appeals the Robertson County Circuit Court’s order

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 13, 2016 No. 04-15-00405-CV David GILLESPIE and Michael O'Brien, Appellants v. A.L. HERNDEN and Frederick R. Zlotucha, Appellees

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 10, 2016 No. 04-15-00405-CV David GILLESPIE and Michael O'Brien, Appellants v. A.L. HERNDEN and Frederick R. Zlotucha, Appell

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Felton, Judges Humphreys and Kelsey PUBLISHED Argued at Alexandria, Virginia PATRICIA TACKETT v. Record No. 1519-12-4 ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DELORES O’BRIEN HEFFERNAN OPINION BY JUDGE ROBERT J. H

299 B.R. 725 (2003) In re Kelli M. O'BRIEN, Debtor. Kelli M. O'Brien, Plaintiff, v. First Marblehead Education Resources, Inc. f/k/a the Education Resources Institute a/k/a TERI, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 02-36307 (CGM), Adversary No. 02-7190. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. October 10, 2003. *726 DEC

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges O’Brien, Lorish and Senior Judge Annunziata PUBLISHED Argued at Alexandria, Virginia JASON SAM HARRIS v. Record No. 1174-21-4 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA OPINION BY JUDGE LISA M. LORISH JASON HARRIS, S/K

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Felton, Judges Humphreys and Kelsey PUBLISHED Argued at Alexandria, Virginia PATRICIA TACKETT v. Record No. 1519-12-4 ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DELORES O’BRIEN HEFFERNAN OPINION BY JUDGE ROBERT J. H

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0150p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JASON COUNTS; DONALD KLEIN; OSCAR ZAMORA; │ JASON SILVE

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2024 VT 32