Cases

El Juez Asociado Señor Corrada Del Río emitió la opinión del Tribunal. I — ! Tras aproximadamente un año de matrimonio y haber procreado un hijo, el 22 de diciembre de 1987 el Sr. Miguel Arias Ferrer (en adelante el peticionario) y la Sra. Mildred Alvarez Elvira (en adelante la recurrida) se divorciaron en el condado de Dade, en el estado de Florida. En el procedi-miento de divorcio, el tribunal otor

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: Ruth Jeanette Orellana, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") denying her all relief from deportation. The BIA upheld the finding of an immigration judge ("IJ") that Orellana, although persecuted because of her membership in a particular social group, had failed to estab

NO. 12-14-00253-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JERRY WEAKS AND JOYCE WEAKS, § APPEAL FROM THE 392ND APPELLANTS V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT KATHLEEN JEANETTE WHITE, APPELLEE § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

CC-1999-37 1 EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Mildred Álvarez Elvira Recurrida Certiorari v. 2002 TSPR 31 Miguel Arias Ferrer 156 DPR ____ Peticionario Número del Caso: CC-2001-310 Fecha: 18/marzo/2002 Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones:

825 F.Supp. 443 (1993) RICHMOND STEEL, INC., Plaintiff, v. LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY, LTD., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 90-2334 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 14, 1993. *444 Charles A. Cordero, Cordero, Miranda & Pinto, San Juan, PR, for Richmond Steel, Inc. Luis M. Angelet-Frau, Vazq

821 F.Supp. 793 (1993) RICHMOND STEEL, INC., Plaintiff, v. LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY, LTD., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 90-2334 HL. United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 26, 1993. *794 *795 Charles A. Cordero, Cordero, Miranda & Pinto, San Juan, PR, for Richmond

OPINION & ORDER PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Pending before this Court are plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt.# 15) and the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. (Dkt.# 22). Plaintiffs requested three extensions of time (Dkt. 26, 29, 30) to reply to defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, and failed to comply with their own suggested extension-deadlines on all th

ORDER The petition for en banc panel rehearing and the petition for full court rehearing en banc are denied. See Fed. R.App. P. 40; Fed. R.App. P. 35; Cir. R. 35-3. BERZON, Circuit Judge, with whom PREGERSON, REINHARDT, THOMAS, WARDLAW, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, jo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT ZOLLY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF OAKLAND Defendant and Respondent. S262634 First Appellate District, Division One A154986 Alameda County Superior Court RG16821376 August 11,

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Julio Leandry-Hernández seeks review of the Commissioner’s decision finding that *204he is not entitled to disability benefits under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). Leandry asks for the decision to be reversed and for an order either awarding disability benefits o

38 So.3d 944 (2010) WHITE HAUTE, LLC v. Woodrow Wilson MAYO. No. 09-CA-955. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. March 23, 2010. *946 James F. Willeford, Reagan L. Toledano, Attorneys at Law, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Woodrow Wilson Mayo, In Proper Person River Ridge, LA, Defendant/Appellee, In Prop

OPINION AND ORDER LAFFITTE, District Judge. Before the Court is a motion to dismiss by codefendant Valentin Beato (“Beato”). Plaintiff Richmond Steel, Inc. (“RSI”), a construction firm based in Texas, brought this claim for declaratory relief and monetary damages based on diversity jurisdiction 1. This case arises out of the construction of a project known as the “Mayaguez Com

- Opinion CORRIGAN, J. This case arises at the intersection of the unfair competition law (UCL; Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) and the Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA; Ins. Code, § 790 et seq.). The question is whether insurance practices that violate the UIPA can support a UCL action. In Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Companies

795 F.Supp. 1262 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Ana MORILLO, a/k/a Rossi Colon, a/k/a Marta Fernandez, a/k/a Luz Lopez, a/k/a Gloria Velez, a/k/a Jeanette Ruiz, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Jane ARENDELL, a/k/a Maria Gonzalez, a/k/a Annette Ri

173 Cal.App.4th 632 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT CHESTER HENNING, Defendant and Appellant. No. C058105. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. April 29, 2009. CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION[*] *634 Barbara Coffman, under

CYR, Circuit Judge. Jorge Rodriguez Alvarado appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence entered against him on four felony charges arising out of a scheme to counterfeit and distribute one hundred dollar bills, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 471-474 and 2. 1 We affirm.

825 F.Supp. 19 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Martha CONCEPCION, a/k/a Martha Martinez, a/k/a Martha Morales, a/k/a Julianna Sanchez, a/k/a Sonia Serrano, a/k/a Gladys Torres, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Ana MORILLO, a/k/a Rossi Colon, a/k/a Marta Fernandez, a/k/a Luz Lopez, a/k/a Gloria Velez, a/k/a Jeanette Ruiz, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America v. Jane ARENDELL, a/k/a Maria Gonzalez, a/k/a Annette Rive

PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents two main issues: (1) whether a defendant has standing to challenge the use of a tracking device with a global positioning system to locate a vehicle the defendant possessed when the tracking device was installed, but not when the tracking device was later used to seize incriminating evidence; and (2). whether the district court violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amen

February 9, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-1901 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO Defendant, Appellant. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 4, 1993, is amended as f

USCA1 Opinion February 9, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-1901 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JORGE L. RODRIGUEZ ALVARADO