Cases

ORDER LANCE M. AFRICK, District Judge. The Court, having considered the motions, the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the objection by plaintiff, Brenda Aimee Smith, which is hereby OVERRULED, approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED t

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Leah K. Henderson, seeks judicial review of a decision of Defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying her application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381— 1383Í.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM L. STANDISH, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Tracey Brenda Davis and Defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff seeks review of final decisions by the Commissioner denying her claims for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of

602 F.Supp.2d 266 (2009) Daniel AVERY, Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-30174-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 13, 2009. *268 Karen L. Goodwin, United States Attorney's Office, Springfield, MA, for Defendant. Stephen R. Ka

(2008) Daniel BARTON, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,[1] Defendant. No. 4:07CV00067 FRB. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. March 10, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDERICK R. BUCKLES, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is on appeal for review of an adverse

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Ernesto A. Trujillo appeals from a district court order affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny his applications for social security disability benefits and supplemental security income payments under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Exercising our jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER MAE A. D’AGOSTINO, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christina Hamedallah brings the above-captioned action on behalf of her minor daughter, E.B., pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act, seeking a review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny E.B.’s application for supplemental security income (“SSI”).

604 F.Supp.2d 104 (2009) Taneta GUTHRIE, on behalf of Jemal Powe, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-029 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2009. *106 Stephen F. Shea, Elkind & Shea, Silver Spring, MD, for Plaintiff. Fred El

728 F.Supp.2d 168 (2010) Candy L. HICKMAN, on behalf of M.A.H., Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE[*], Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 7:07-CV-1077 (NAM/VEB). United States District Court, N.D. New York. July 27, 2010. *170 Conboy, McKay, Bachman & Kendall, LLP, Peter L. Walton, Esq., of Counsel, Water

ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on review of the Commissioner’s decision that denied a child’s claim, through his mother, for supplemental security income. For the reasons stated below, this case is reversed and remanded for further fact finding. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Claimant C.J.L., a minor child, was born on J

OPINION KELLY, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff, Southersby Development Corporation (“Southersby”), a real estate developer, filed this action against the Borough of Jefferson Hills (“the Borough”) and William L. McVicker (“McVicker”) (collectively “Defendants”), a former Borough employee, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), alleging that Defendants violated its right to equ

ante, p. 966. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

JON E. DEGUILIO, Judge United States District Court Plaintiff Sherry Ann Keiper appeals the denial of her claim for disability insurance benefits. For the following reasons, the Court remands this matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. BACKGROUND Ms. Keiper filed her initial application for benefits on June 2, 2014, alleging disability beginning May 14, 2014. Ms. Keiper

Scudder, Circuit Judge. *963When a person applies for disability benefits, the Social Security Administration evaluates that person's capacity to work and, at the fifth and final step of the analysis, assesses whether significant numbers of jobs exist that someone with those abilities and limitations could perform. This determination is consequ

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. MARTIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court on a Complaint [DE 1], filed by Plaintiff Sheila A. Visiniaz on ■ February 3, 2016, and a Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of Her Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security [DE 16], filed by Plaintiff on August 4, '2016. Plaintiff requests that the decision of the Administrative La

William C. Lee, Judge This matter is before the court for judicial review of a final decision of the defendant *749Commissioner of Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB), as provided for in the Social Security Act. Section 205(g) of the Act provides, inter alia, "[a]s part of his a

ORDER MARCIA MORALES HOWARD, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Monte C. Richardson’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 34; Report), entered on February 8, 2016. In the Report, Magistrate Judge Richardson recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 25; Motion) be denied, and that Defendant be di

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jolly Manoj Caplash ("Plaintiff") commenced this litigation on December 29, 2015, and requested that this Court set aside the denial and subsequent refusals to reopen Plaintiff's Form I-130 family-based immigration petition (the "Petition") filed on behalf of his brother with the United States Citizenship and Immigratio

GRASZ, Circuit Judge. *1041 The Secretary of Labor's ("Secretary") Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA") issued a citation to Bussen Quarries, Inc. ("Bussen"). The Secretary claimed Bussen violated federal regulation

SECTION I AMENDED ORDER AND REASONS LANCE M. AFRIGK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are several motions" in limine as well as other pretrial issues that were briefed in accordance with this Court’s April 29, 2016 minute entry.1 Specifically, plaintiff has filed a motion2 in limine challenging the