Cases

[J-108-2018] [MO:Saylor, C.J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT GENERAL MOTORS, LLC : No. 24 MAP 2018 : : Appeal from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court at No. 1075 CD : 2016 dat

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC, ) No. ED112211 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs.

JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Plaintiff Traci Bahena is suing defendants Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC and Messerli & Kramer, PA under the Wisconsin Consumer Act (WCA) and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Bahena alleges that defendants brought a state-court debt collection action against her when they did not have a legal right to do so, because defendants did not provide the required notice of the right to c

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. |2In this workers’ compensation dispute, Defendant, Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District # 2, d/b/a East Jefferson General Hospital (“EJGH”), appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Claimant, Sanjanette Rixner, finding her preexisting condition was aggravated by her three work-related accidents and awarding workers’ compensation benefits and penalties. For the reasons that follow, we affirm

Memorandum BENSON EVERETT LEGG, District Judge. Now pending is the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion to Certify Class. Docket No. 288. The issues have been fully briefed, and on January 21, 2011 and February 7, 2011, the Court held a hearing. For the reasons stat- ed herein, the Court will, by separate Order, DENY the Motion. I. BACKGROUND This

ORDER REMANDING CASE VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This procedurally complex civil action was originally filed on December 14, 2011, in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, by the Plaintiff, Aurora Loan Services, LLC (“Aurora”), against the De-fendánt, Arthenia W. Jefferson. (Doc. 1-1 at 1). The Comp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEFFERSON-11TH STREET, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01416 (CJN) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jefferson-11th Street, LLC’s Motion to Alter or Amend a Final Order under

MEMORANDUM BENSON EVERETT LEGG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Now pending is the plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class. Paper No. 243. The plaintiffs seek to certify a class that includes all Maryland residents who currently own Ford Explorers, Mercury Mountaineers or Ford Windstars for certain model years. They allege that the front seats in the class vehicles are de

[Cite as Castner v. Jefferson Cty., 2025-Ohio-1309.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEFFERSON COUNTY GEORGE CASTNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY ET AL., Defendants-Ap

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JAMES J. BRADY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed by Defendants General Motors LLC1 (“GM”), All Star Advertising Agency, Inc., All Star Chevrolet North, L.L.C., and All Star Chevrolet, Inc. (the All Star Defendants are re

Hilda Ruffin, one of the plaintiffs below, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of General Motors Acceptance Corporation ("GMAC"), the defendant below. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. *Page 2 Factual Background Ruffin, who is African-American, began working for GMAC as a level-2 credit clerk in GMAC's Gadsden office in 1985. In 1986, she was promoted to a level-3 credit clerk. In 1987, she was promoted

227 P.3d 266 (2010) 2010 UT App 34 DIXON BUILDING, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Adrian JEFFERSON and Rosae L. Jefferson, Defendants, Bad Boys Bail Bonds, Inc., Appellant. No. 20081062-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. February 11, 2010. *267 C. Danny Frazier and Michael R. Power, West Valley City, for A

200 S.W.3d 1 (2006) Randall D. PETERS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Constance Marie Peters, Deceased, Respondent, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; Appellant Moffett's Auto Works, Inc., Defendant. No. WD 62807. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 17, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied February 28, 2006. Applicat

JUSTICE MUNDY, Concurring and Dissenting I join Section II of the well-reasoned Majority Opinion finding that the surcharge General Motors imposed in this case is not permissible pursuant to Section 9(b.4) of the Board of Vehicles Act. I write separately, however, to note my disagreement with Section I of the Majority Opinion. Because I conclude that the Majority's construction in Section 1 of the Board of Vehicles Act (the Act), 6

Matter of Freedom Found. v Jefferson County (2024 NY Slip Op 03944) Matter of Freedom Found. v Jefferson County 2024 NY Slip Op 03944 Decided on July 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed July 12, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00348-CV JAQUELIA TYCHELLE JEFFERSON, Appellant V. SONIA PARRA, Appellee On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas

DONALDSON, Judge. Ann Brown appeals from a judgment entered by the Madison Circuit Court (“trial court”) granting a variance that allows a reduction in the number of required *1215parking spaces for Brown’s business, Ann’s Studio of Dance (“the dance studio”), subject to conditions imposed by the trial court. We affirm. Facts and Procedural

PARKER, Justice. Numerous plaintiffs, identified below, filed a wrongful-death action under § 6-5-410, Ala. Code 1975, against Continental Motors, Inc. ("CMI"), and RAM Aircraft, LP ("RAM"), among others, in the Mobile Circuit Court ("the circuit court") on behalf of the heirs of Mark Goldstein, Marjorie Gonzalez, and Luis Angel Lopez Barillas (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the decedents"). CMI and RAM filed motions for

PARKER, Justice. Numerous plaintiffs, identified below, filed a wrongful-death action under § 6-5-410, Ala. Code 1975, against Continental Motors, Inc. ("CMI"), and RAM Aircraft, LP ("RAM"), among others, in the Mobile Circuit Court ("the circuit court") on behalf of the heirs of Mark Goldstein, Marjorie Gonzalez, and Luis Angel Lopez Barillas (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the decedents"). CMI and RAM filed motions for

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE McCullough I respectfully dissent from the thoughtful Majority because I do not agree that Objectors’ testimony and documentation “was the kind of speculative evidence insufficient to constitute proof of detriment to health, safety, and welfare exceeding those ordinarily to be. expected from the proposed use.” (Maj. op. at 563.)1