⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jeffrey R. Sokol”

Matter of Sokolpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 198 N.Y.S.3d 694; 2023 NY Slip Op 05665
Matter of Sokol (2023 NY Slip Op 05665) Matter of Sokol 2023 NY Slip Op 05665 Decided on November 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Per Curiam Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1200 Filed July 24, 2019 DAVID and RACHAEL SOKOL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. ROBERT and EILEEN MORRISSEY, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell, Judge. Homebuyers appeal the district court’s denial of their breach-of-implie
Weller v. Sokolpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974-05-13 · Published · cited 6× · 318 A.2d 193; 271 Md. 420
271 Md. 420 (1974) 318 A.2d 193 WELLER, ETC. ET AL. v. SOKOL ET AL., TRUSTEES UNDER LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ARTHUR NATTANS [No. 221, September Term, 1973.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 15, 1974. Motion for rehearing filed May 6, 1974. Denied May 7, 1974. Motion for rehearing filed May 1
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2017-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0801 Filed October 25, 2017 DAVID and RACHAEL SOKOL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, vs. ROBERT and EILEEN MORRISSEY, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell, Judge. Home buyers appeal from a district court order on their claims relate
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-04-27 · Published · cited 137× · 590 U.S. 336; 140 S. Ct. 1525; 206 L. Ed. 2d 798
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 590 U. S. ____ (2020) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may b
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017-10-20 · Published · cited 1× · 873 F.3d 1215; 2017 WL 4700311; 120 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2017; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20598
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendant Kathleen Stegman was convicted by a jury of two counts .of evading her personal taxes for the tax years 2007 and 2008, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201. Stegman was- sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 51 months, to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. The district court also ordered Ste
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000-11-22 · Published · cited 2× · 14 P.3d 672; 171 Or. App. 198; 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1921
14 P.3d 672 (2000) 171 Or. App. 198 G.W. PAULSON CO., Plaintiff, v. Kevin M. GRADY and Michelle R. Grady, husband and wife; Associates Financial Services Company of Oregon, Inc., an Oregon corporation; Portland Mortgage Company, an Oregon corporation; Fleet Mortgage Corp., a South Carolina corporation; Principal Residential Mortgage, Inc., an Iowa corporation; and Craigan Construction Company, Inc., an Oregon corporation,
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 227 F.R.D. 490; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8820; 2005 WL 1084623
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DISMISSAL/TRANSFER BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO JOIN INDISPENSABLE PARTY FEIKENS, District Judge. This is a cause of action regarding a check which was fraudulently endorsed and then passed through the hands of many different banks. Plaintiff, American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc. (“AMEX”), the drawer of a check, brings this cause of actio
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003-01-16 · Published · cited 1× · 290 B.R. 676; 49 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1298; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7790
290 B.R. 676 (2003) GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNION PLANTERS BANK, N.A., Defendant. No. 4:01CV1183ERW. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. January 16, 2003. *677 David E. Runck, Oppenheimer, Wolff & Donnelly, Minneapolis, MN, Main counsel for Plaintiff GE Capital. Mark Goo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007-03-16 · Published · cited 1× · 219 F. App'x 6
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This petition for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) and the corresponding cross-application for enforcement were presented to the court and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(b). It is
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006-04-25 · Published · cited 1× · 342 B.R. 790; 60 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 191; 2006 WL 1359617; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 977
MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID P. McDONALD, Bankruptcy Judge. General Electric Capital Corporation (“GE Capital”) filed this adversary complaint against Union Planters Bank (“Union Planters”). The parties’ dispute centers on which entity’s security interest had priority with respect to certain cash proceeds (the “Lift Proceeds”) generated post-confirmation by Debtor, Machinery, Inc. (“Machinery”). Bec
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-09-17 · Published · cited 21× · 654 F. Supp. 2d 836; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85271; 2009 WL 2971065
654 F.Supp.2d 836 (2009) Sharankishor DESAI, individually, etc., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 09 C 487. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 17, 2009. *840 Robert A. Izard, Jr., Jeffrey S. Nobel, Seth Klein, Izard Nobel LLP, West Hartford, CT, Carol V.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008-02-28 · Published · cited 7× · 384 B.R. 315; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 775; 2008 WL 553761
384 B.R. 315 (2008) In re NORVERGENCE, INC., Debtor. Wanland and Associates Inc., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Nortel Networks Limited, Nortel Networks Inc., Qwest Communications International Inc., Thomas N. Salzano, Alexander L. Wolf and Robert J. Fine, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-32079 (RG). Adversary No. 05-2439 (RG). United States Bankruptcy Cour
District Court, D. Oregon · 1991-12-06 · Published · cited 4× · 137 B.R. 405; 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2279; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18468; 1991 WL 323000
137 B.R. 405 (1991) In re PLAID PANTRIES, INC., an Oregon corporation [successor by merger to Apollo Distributing Co.; J L & R Merchandising, Inc.; and Plaid Industries, Inc., all Oregon corporations], Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 389-31028-S11, Civ. No. 91-1158-FR. United States District Court, D. Oregon. December 6, 1991. *406 Norman Wap
Matter of McKennapublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 01514
Matter of McKenna (2024 NY Slip Op 01514) Matter of McKenna 2024 NY Slip Op 01514 Decided on March 19, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department PER CURIAM Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Matter of McKennapublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 01514
Matter of McKenna (2024 NY Slip Op 01514) Matter of McKenna 2024 NY Slip Op 01514 Decided on March 19, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department PER CURIAM Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
District Court, N.D. California · 2004-04-19 · Published · cited 143× · 352 F. Supp. 2d 1048; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27327; 2004 WL 3127587
352 F.Supp.2d 1048 (2004) PLATTE ANCHOR BOLT, INC, Plaintiff, v. IHI, INC, et al Defendants. IHI, Inc, Cross-Claimant, v. Park-Ohio Structural Hardware, LLC, et al, Cross-Defendants. IHI, Inc, Counter-Claimant, v. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc, Counter-Defendant. No. C-03-2984 VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 19, 2004.
State v. Limonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005-10-21 · Published · cited 85× · 280 Kan. 275; 122 P.3d 22; 2005 Kan. LEXIS 715
280 Kan. 275 (2005) STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MATTHEW R. LIMON, Appellant. No. 85,898 Supreme Court of Kansas Opinion filed October 21, 2005. James D. Esseks, of American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Lesbian & Gay Rights Project, of New York, New York, argued the cause, and Tamara Lange, of American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Lesbia
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988-06-30 · Published · cited 32× · 542 A.2d 900; 110 N.J. 650; 76 A.L.R. 4th 273; 1988 N.J. LEXIS 65
110 N.J. 650 (1988) 542 A.2d 900 TRIANTAFYLLOS THANASOULIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WINSTON TOWERS 200 ASSOCIATION, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 17, 1988. Decided June 30, 1988. *652 John Dolan Harrington argued the cause for appellant. Josep
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999-12-17 · Published · cited 6× · 78 F. Supp. 2d 794; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19621; 1999 WL 1251808
78 F.Supp.2d 794 (1999) CSC HOLDINGS, INC. Plaintiff, v. J.R.C. PRODUCTS, INC., et al.[1] Defendants. No. 99 C 3516. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 17, 1999. *795 *796 Daniel J. Lefkowitz, P.C., Jericho, NY, (by Daniel J. Lefkowitz, Patrick J