Cases

WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge: Section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 224, provides a variety of advantages to certain types of firms seeking to attach their wires, cable, or other network equipment to utility poles. The Federal Communications Commission, which is charged with applying § 224, in 2011 made three revisions to its interpretation of the statute.

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 65. {concurring in part, dissenting in part). When a landowner employs an independent contractor to perform an activity that this court declares is inherently dangerous as a matter of law, who should bear the cost of the damage to the innocent neighbor's property? Should it be the employer who hires the independent contractor to perform the inherently dangerous activity and reaps the benef

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

VALIHURA, Justice, dissenting: The Court of Chancery generally has broad discretion in fashioning certain equitable remedies.1 Although this might suggest that this Court should defer to the *170Chancellor who ordered one of the most extreme remedies possible — a sale of a financially successful corporation over the objectio

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Magwood Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 59293 ) Under Contract No. W912PQ-13-C-0016 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Heyward R. Manigault President APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVER

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 17, 2014 Session DAVID JONES V. MORTGAGE MENDERS, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 06C1912 Hon. Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Judge No. M2014-00140-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 12, 2014 This appeal involves several claims relating to the sale and refinancing of Plaintiff’s

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,765 DIANA K. HILBURN, Appellant, v. ENERPIPE LTD., Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Section 5 of the Kan

194 P.3d 255 (2008) VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC., Appellant, v. WASHINGTON EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, Steven D. Ackerman, Lessa P. Adams, Angela L. Alexander, Matthew J. Alice, Marsha A. Allgire, Ann M. Almli, Larry F. Ames, Carol A. Arendse, Christine S. Bailey, Jerry J. Bakko, Sharon A. Barakat, Melissa J. Barran, David O. Bauer, Marlena S. Bauer, Thomas W. Becker, Suzanne M. Beckmann, Joanne L. Bell, Trent A. Berring, Starla J. Bessler, Michae

2014 WI 37 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP2085 COMPLETE TITLE: Kelli Brandenburg and Bruce Brandenburg, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Briarwood Forestry Services, LLC, Defendant, McMillan-Warner Mutual Insurance Company and

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

521 F.Supp.2d 465 (2007) Robert and Rebecca ORGAIN, et al. v. CITY OF SALISBURY, et al. Civil No. L-02-2797. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 25, 2007. *466 *467 *468 *469 Carolyn Elefant, Law Offices of C

ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. This matter is back before the court following the opinion of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. MacDonald (MacDonald XI), 641 F.3d 596 (4th Cir.2011), vacating this court’s decision 1 to deny Movant Jeffrey MacDonald’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [DE-111]<

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRANDON BRISKIN, on behalf of No. 22-15815 himself and those similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:21-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 06269-PJH v. OPINION SHOPIFY, INC.; SHOPIFY (USA), INC.; SHOPIFY PAYMENTS (USA), INC., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the U

ACCEPTED 03-15-00285-CV 6511633 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

CLAY, Circuit Judge The League of Women Voters of Michigan ("League"), numerous League members ("League Plaintiffs"), and several Democratic voters ("Individual Plaintiffs") bring suit against Jocelyn Benson, the Michigan Secretary of State in her official capacity, under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, alleging

553 F.Supp.2d 442 (2008) In re DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE, FENFLURAMINE, DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Sheila Brown; et al. v. American Home Products Corporation. MDL Docket No. 1203. Civil Action No. 99-20593. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 8, 2008. As Corrected April 9, 2008.

DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In endorsing a facial challenge to a memorandum, and in holding that the memorandum must be assumed to dictate racial and gender discrimination without a factual hearing, the majority acts contrary to Supreme Court precedent and our own decision in Baker v. United States, 127 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.1997). The majority’s approach is unsupported by any decision of the Supreme