Cases

ACCEPTED 05-14-01464-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 05-14-01464-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

OPINION Opinion by Justice Whitehill This case presents an issue of first impression: If a 12-year-old person receives medical treatment and dies more than two years after that treatment ends, does the Texas Constitution’s Open Courts Clause prevent the running of limitations against otherwise untimely filed survival and wrongful-death claims against her

Order entered February 10, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01464-CV SHERI DURHAM, ET AL., Appellants V. CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Order entered June 19, 2015 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01464-CV SHERI DURHAM, ET AL., Appellants V. CHILDREN’S MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

ACCEPTED 05-14-01464-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

Nos. 2--07--0717 & 2--07--1272 cons. Filed: 8-14-08 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ JUDY ANDERSON, Deceased, by Leonard ) Appeal from the Circuit Court Anderson, Special Administrator,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBINSON, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner David Jenkins (“petitioner”) is a Delaware inmate in custody at the Howard R. Young Correctional Institution in Wilmington, Delaware. Presently before the court is petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (D.I. 1) For the reasons that follow, the court will dismiss his appli

*1279Opinion CHIN, J. We granted review in this case to consider the extent, if any, to which the California Public Records Act (CPRA or Act) (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.) requires disclosure to a newspaper publisher of records of the County of San Diego Civil Service Commission (Commission) relating to a peace officer’s administrative appeal of a disci

894 N.E.2d 827 (2008) Judy ANDERSON, Deceased, by Leonard Anderson, Special Administrator, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. RUSH-COPLEY MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. Judy Anderson, Deceased, by Leonard Anderson, Special Administrator, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rush-Copley Medical Center, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 2-07-0717, 2-07-1272. Appellate C

OPINION Opinion by Justice MURPHY. In this interlocutory appeal, appellants challenge the trial court’s orders denying their motions to dismiss appellees’ health care liability claims for failure to file an expert report complying with the requirements of chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &a;

OPINION GARY R. WADE, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. The minor beneficiary of a $100,000 life insurance policy filed suit against his financial guardian and the insurance company after the gua

123 S.E.2d 232 (1961) J. W. COPLEY, Jr. v. Howard B. CHAMBERS. No. 12126. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 6, 1961. Decided November 7, 1961. *233 Poffenbarger & Bowles, Martin C. Bowles, Leonard H. Higgins, Charleston, for appellant. Jenkins & Jenkins, John E. Jenkins

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS AND THE COURT’S TRIAL PLAN BRIMMER, District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to De-certify the Class and the Plaintiffs’ opposition thereto, and the trial plans submitted by the parties, and the Court, having reviewed the relevant materials on file herein, having heard the oral arguments of

THE COURT. The above action was brought by Marie Kroijer (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff), with whom was joined her husband, to recover damages for personal injuries. The action arose out of an accident which occurred on February 2, 1930, at a street intersection in Redwood City. Whipple Avenue runs east and west, and is intersected on the south by King Street and on the north by Copley Avenue, the latter being a continuation in that direction of King Street. Pl

DISSENTING OPINION BY GANTMAN, P.J.: I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse and remand the case for further proceedings. Instead, I think the trial court correctly denied Mr. Andrews’ petition to strike the confessed judgment. I further disagree with the majority that the case of A.B. & F. Contracting Corp. v. Matthews Coal Co., 194 Pa.Super. 271, 166 A.2d 317 (1960) is dis-

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Steven Brett Offutt, FILED Defendant Below, Petitioner March 23, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0194 (Jefferson County CC-19-2017-C-159) SUPREME COURT OF APPE

05/08/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 13, 2018 Session MATTHEW BROCK HANCE V. DANIELLE SMITH HANCE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamblen County No. 2016-CV-209 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor No. E2017-01419-COA-R3-CV The iss

The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) charged Damian Gallaher1 in six separate matters, each of which proceeded as a default case under SCR 2 3.210. Based on its proceedings, the KBA Board of Governors found Gallaher guilty in all six cases, and recommended that Gallaher be suspended from the practice of law for five years, with the suspension being probated to one year upon Gallaher satisfying certain c

J-A28021-14 2015 PA Super 114 THE DIME BANK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee v. PETER ANDREWS Appellant No. 1129 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Order Entered March 6, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County