⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jenks v. Fox, Sr.”

Hamill v. Jenkspublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965-09-20 · Published · cited 0× · 136 N.W.2d 699; 1 Mich. App. 381; 1965 Mich. App. LEXIS 231
1 Mich. App. 381 (1965) 136 N.W.2d 699 HAMILL v. JENKS. Docket Nos. 7, 8. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 20, 1965. *383 Albert T. Washburne (Edwin G. Pailthrop, of counsel) and Donald G. Fox, for plaintiff. Nathaniel W. Stroup, for defendants. HOLBROO
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 163 F. Supp. 2d 890; 2001 WL 1097738
163 F.Supp.2d 890 (2001) The ESTATE OF William R. REYNOLDS, Sr., Plaintiff, v. GREENE COUNTY, et al., Defendants. No. C-3-99-115. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 26, 2001. *891 Ralph Buss, Painesville, OH, for Plaintiff. Jeffrey Turner, Jenks, Surdyk & Cowdrey, Dayton, OH, for Defendant
Kinlocke v. Bentonpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017-06-19 · Published · cited 1× · 257 F. Supp. 3d 1368
ORDER Timothy C. Batten, Sr., United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Casey T. Benton, J.E. Fox, and DeKalb County, Georgia, for judgment on the pleadings [12]. 1. Background1 Plaintiff Kent-Stephen Kinlocke is a resident of Stone Mountain, Georgia. On Saturday, November 4, 2014, at
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2001-08-15 · Published · cited 39× · 2001 Ohio 1266; 92 Ohio St. 3d 436
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 92 Ohio St.3d 436.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JACKSON, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Jackson, 2001-Ohio-1266.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when. (No. 98-726—Submitted April 24, 2001—Decided August 15, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County, No. 97-CR-04-1902.
State v. Jonespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-09-22 · Published · cited 4× · 2016 Ohio 5923
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-5923.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103290 and 103302 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
State v. Jonespublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-11-10 · Published · cited 2× · 2016 Ohio 7702
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-7702.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103290 and 103302 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
State v. Garrettpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2022-11-30 · Published · cited 63× · 171 Ohio St. 3d 139; 216 N.E.3d 569; 2022 Ohio 4218
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Garrett, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4218.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or
State v. McGuirepublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 1997-12-10 · Published · cited 47× · 1997 Ohio 335; 80 Ohio St. 3d 390
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 80 Ohio St.3d 390.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MCGUIRE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. McGuire, 1997-Ohio-335.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when—Residual doubt is not an acceptable mitigating factor under R.C. 2929.04(B). Residual doubt is not an acceptable mitigating factor under R.C. 2929.04(B), since it is irrelevant to the issue of whether the defendant
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002-10-22 · Published · cited 41× · 253 Mich. App. 486; 656 N.W.2d 195
Griffin, J. Defendants appeal as of right from the entry of judgment in the amount of $29,332,686 following the jury’s verdict in plaintiffs’ favor in this wrongful death action. We reverse the judgment, *488vacate the court’s order, and remand for entry of a judgment and order in favor of defendants, holding that under the circumstances defendants owed no legally cogniza
State v. Josephpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 1995-08-30 · Published · cited 32× · 1995 Ohio 288; 73 Ohio St. 3d 450
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 450.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JOSEPH, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Joseph, 1995-Ohio-288.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when. (No. 94-372—Submitted May 10, 1995—Decided August 30, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No. 1-91-11. __________________ {¶ 1} During the fall of 1
Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996-01-17 · Published · cited 60× · 671 N.E.2d 317; 108 Ohio App. 3d 547
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 549 Appellants, Lee John Kimberly, a minor by and through his father and next friend Ronald Kimberly, Sr., Virginia Kimberly, Ronald Kimberly, Jr., a minor by and through his father and next friend Ronald Kimberly, Sr., and Ronald Kimberly, Sr., appeal from a grant of summary judgment by the Montgomery County Court of
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996-10-11 · Published · cited 0× · 943 F. Supp. 993
DECISION AND ORDER WARREN, District Judge. Now before the Court is defendant’s, City of Milwaukee, motion to dismiss the plaintiffs Fourth Claim for Relief (Nuisance), Fifth Claim for Relief (Negligence) and Sixth Claim for Relief (Property Damage). For the reasons that follow, the motion by the City of Milwaukee is GRANTED. I. INTRODUCTION
State v. Langpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2011-08-31 · Published · cited 512× · 2011 Ohio 4215; 129 Ohio St. 3d 512
O’Donnell, J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal as of right by defendant-appellant, Edward Lang. A jury convicted him of the aggravated murder of Marnell Cheek and Jaron Burditte and of aggravated robbery, with each count carrying gun specifications, and it recommended the sentence of death for the aggravated murder of Cheek and life with no possibility of parole for the murder of Burditt
State v. Josephpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 1995-08-30 · Published · cited 255× · 73 Ohio St. 3d 450; 653 N.E.2d 285
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J. In a line of cases beginning with State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 1, 520 N.E.2d 568, we have adopted the view that when we review death-penalty cases, we are not required to address all propositions of law in opinion form. State v. Simko (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 483, 644 N.E.2d 345; State v. Scudder (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 263, 643 N.E.2d 524; State v. Hawkins
State v. McGuirepublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 1997-12-10 · Published · cited 353× · 80 Ohio St. 3d 390; 686 N.E.2d 1112
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J. Appellant has raised eighteen propositions of law for our consideration, which we have fully reviewed according to R.C. 2929.05(A). (See Appendix.) However, pursuant to State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 1, 520 N.E.2d 568, and subsequent cases, we summarily reject, without discussing, the merits of a number of appellant’s propositions of law, as they involve settled issues. (Propositi
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2001-08-15 · Published · cited 233× · 92 Ohio St. 3d 436; 751 N.E.2d 946
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J. Appellant, Kareem Jackson, appeals his conviction of, and death sentence for, the aggravated murders of Antorio Hunter and Terrance Walker. The evidence at trial revealed that on the evening of March 24, 1997, appellant and four other individuals decided to rob an apartment in Columbus, Ohio. Appellant and a man called “Little Bee” devised the plan, which called for both men to ente
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003-01-23 · Published · cited 3× · 656 N.W.2d 195
656 N.W.2d 195 (2002) Patricia GRAVES and Frank Amedure, Sr., as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Scott Amedure, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. WARNER BROS., Jenny Jones Show, and Telepictures, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 226645. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted July 9, 2002, at Detroit. Decided October 22, 2002,
State v. Lynchpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2003-05-14 · Published · cited 6× · 98 Ohio St. 3d 514
Moyer, C.J. {¶ 1} In this appeal, defendant-appellant, Ralph L. Lynch, raises 22 propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating *515factors and compared his sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm defenda
State v. Drummondpublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 2006-10-18 · Published · cited 389× · 111 Ohio St. 3d 14
Lanzinger, J. {¶ 1} On the evening of March 24, 2003, during a drive-by shooting, assault-rifle bullets and 9 mm shots were fired into the home of Jiyen Dent in Youngstown, Ohio. One bullet killed three-month-old Jiyen Dent Jr., who was in the living room. John E. Drummond Jr., was indicted, tried, and convicted by a jury of the aggravated murder of the infant Jiyen. {¶ 2} Drummond was charged with two co
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 885 F. Supp. 2d 1097; 2012 WL 3150408; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107934
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement and Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Release, filed April 16, 2012 (Doc. 386) (“Motion for Preliminary Approval”); and (ii) the Court’s Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing for Notice, filed April 23, 201