Cases

J. LEON HOLMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Deandre Green claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the City of Helena-West Helena, Arkansas, violated his constitutional right to a prompt first appearance after his arrest. The City and Green both move for summary judgment. For the reasons that will be explained, the City

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Mark Marentette ("Plaintiff") commenced this civil rights action alleging that Defendants violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights when they terminated him as Fire Chief of the City of Canandaigua. (Dkt. 21). Specifically, Plaintiff claims that Defendants terminated him without due process, and that Defendan

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1589 GORDON GOINES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD; DAVID SHAW; ROBERT DEAN; D. L. WILLIAMS; JENNA RHODES; JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg

WILLHITE, Acting P. J. *1039John Doe, formerly an undergraduate student at the University of Southern California (USC), appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of administrative mandate, by which Doe sought to set aside his expulsion. (

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FRESH MIX, LLC, No. 25-2462 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:24-cv-00397- RFB-NJK v. PISANELLI BICE, PLLC; JAMES J. ORDER PISANELLI Esquire, Attorney; CERTIFYING DEBRA L. SPINELLI, Attorney; QUESTION TO AVA MARIE SC

Illinois Official Reports Supreme Court People v. Holt, 2014 IL 116989 Caption in Supreme THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. MARY Court: M. HOLT, Appellant. Docket No. 116989 Filed November 20, 2014 Held An attorney did not render ineffective assistance of counsel by arguing

FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JUDGE JOHN.W. deGRAVELLES TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW.. .859 A. INTRODUCTION... 859 B. PROCEDURAL HISTORY... 859 C. SUMMARY OF CONTENTIONS OF PARTIES.. .860 D. ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT... 863 E. BACKGROUND AND PARTIES’ FACTUAL ARGUMENTS... 863

Case: 18-12344 Date Filed: 09/17/2020 Page: 1 of 48 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-12344 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cv-80393-RLR CHARLES T. JOHNSON, on

State of Maryland v. Kirk Matthews, No. 15, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. EXPERT WITNESSES – ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY – MARYLAND RULES 5-702 AND 5-403 – REVIEW FOR ABUSE OF DISCRETION The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting testimony of the State’s photogrammetry expert witness. At the hearing on the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert testimony, the expert opined that a person shown carrying a shotgun in an image capt

State of Maryland v. Kirk Matthews, No. 15, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. EXPERT WITNESSES – ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY – MARYLAND RULES 5-702 AND 5-403 – REVIEW FOR ABUSE OF DISCRETION The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting testimony of the State’s photogrammetry expert witness. At the hearing on the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert testimony, the expert opined that a person shown carrying a shotgun in an image capt

State of Maryland v. Kirk Matthews, No. 15, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Biran, J. EXPERT WITNESSES – ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY – MARYLAND RULES 5-702 AND 5-403 – REVIEW FOR ABUSE OF DISCRETION The Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting testimony of the State’s photogrammetry expert witness. At the hearing on the defendant’s motion to exclude the expert testimony, the expert opined that a person shown carrying a shotgun in an image capt

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00385-COA IN THE INTEREST OF T.L., A MINOR, T.L., A APPELLANT MINOR, T.L., A MINOR, T.L., A MINOR: JESSICA L. v. FORREST COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF THE APPELLEES MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES, BY ANDREA A. SANDERS AND T.L., T.L., T.L., AND T.L., MINORS, BY AND THROUGH THEIR NEXT FRIEND, ANDREA A. SANDER

MEMORANDUM DECISION -. AND ORDER ' GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge. Plaintiffs brought this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 •U.S.C.§ 201 et seq. and the New York *310State Labor Law (“NYLL”) § 190 et seq., which govern minimum employee compensation, as well as under Title 12 of New Y

Filed 5/28/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT MATTHEW BOERMEESTER, B290675 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS170473) v. AINSLEY CARRY et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los A

Filed 6/4/20 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT MATTHEW BOERMEESTER, B290675 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS170473) v. ORDER MODIFYING A

354 N.E.2d 219 (1976) Jeanna Pauline KELSIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 1274S241. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 21, 1976. Rehearing Denied November 1, 1976. *221 James D. Lopp, Sr., James D. Lopp, Jr., Evansville, for appellant. Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., J. Roland Duvall, Dep

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 22, 2013 Session S. A. M. D. v. J. P. D. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00543806 Donna M. Fields, Judge No. W2013-00314-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 30, 2013 Appellant/Mother appeals the trial court’s post-divorce modification of Appellee/Father’s c

MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. Petitioner David Russell Danner (“Danner”), who is presently incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution in Coal Township, Pennsylvania, initiated this action on May 17, 2011, by filing a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, as amended August 18, 2011. (Doc. 11.) In the petition, Danner challenges his

2025 IL App (4th) 240514 FILED November 17, 2025 NO. 4-24-0514 Carla Bender 4 District Appellate th IN THE APPELLATE COURT

Thomas J. Tucker, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction The Defendant in these two adversary proceedings, Olivia Wise, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case on April 14, 2017. In Adversary Proceeding Number 17-4535, the Plaintiff Daniel M. McDermott, United States Trustee, seeks a judgment denying Defendant's discharge, based on