Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jennifer F Muniz”
United States v. Jennifer Richmondpublic domain
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: *354 During a traffic stop, a state trooper pushed his fingers against the vehicle's tire to try and confirm his suspicion that it contained more than just air. We conclude that the brief physical examination of the tire was subject to the Fourth Amendment under t
People v. Munizpublic domain
190 P.3d 774 (2008) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 03CA0268. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. February 21, 2008. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing April 3, 2008. Certiorari Denied August 18, 2008. *777 John W. Suthers, Attorn
State v. Munizpublic domain
74 P.3d 86 (2003) 134 N.M. 152 2003-NMSC-021 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard MUNIZ, Defendant-Petitioner. No. 26,583. Supreme Court of New Mexico. July 9, 2003. *87 John Bigelow, Chief Public Defender, Jennifer R. Albright, Assistant Appellate Defender, Santa F
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jennifer Doyle, : Appellant : : v. : No. 289 C.D. 2024 : Argued: June 3, 2025 Alejandro Muniz-Nieves : : v. : : D&M Esposito Family F
State v. Munizpublic domain
11 P.3d 613 (2000) 2000-NMCA-089 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Joseph MUNIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 20,116. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. August 29, 2000. Certiorari Granted October 19, 2000. *614 Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, Steven S Suttle, Assistant At
State v. Braypublic domain
*811 DE MUNIZ, J. This matter is before the court on an interlocutory appeal of an order involving a crime victim’s rights. See ORS 147.537 (allowing such appeals). In his criminal case, defendant unsuccessfully sought an order compelling the victim to produce the hard drive of her lap
State v. Enyeartpublic domain
ARMSTRONG, R J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for interfering with a peace officer, ORS 162.247(l)(b). While defendant was stopped at a red light, a police officer approached defendant and ordered her to turn off her car’s engine. When the stoplight turned green, defendant drove off. The state subsequently charged defendant with attempting to elude a police officer, ORS 811.540(l)(b)(A). The trial court did not co
State v. Sawatzkypublic domain
125 P.3d 722 (2005) 339 Or. 689 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. Sylvia Marie SAWATZKY, Defendant-Relator. (CC Nos. 000332189, 000937299; SC S52332). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted September 9, 2005. Decided December 30, 2005. *723 Gregory F. Silver, Met
BETH PHILLIPS, JUDGE Plaintiffs Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, ("Comprehensive Health"), and Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, ("RHS"), filed suit challenging regulations governing facilities that administer medication abortions. Pending is their Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Following a hearing and extensive briefing by the parties, the Court concludes that th
Steir v. Girl Scouts of the USApublic domain
STEARNS, District Judge. This appeal arises from a failed discrimination lawsuit brought on behalf of Marika Steir by her mother, Linda Steir, against the Girl Scouts of the USA (Girl Scouts) and Spar & Spindle Council, a regional agency that supervises local Girl Scout troops. Because the case was ultimately dismissed for reasons that are not a reflection
Steir v. Girl Scouts of USApublic domain
218 F.Supp.2d 58 (2002) Linda J. STEIR, m/n/f Marika Steir v. GIRL SCOUTS OF THE USA and Spar & Spindle Council of the Girl Scouts No. CIV. 00-456-B. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. September 10, 2002. *59 *60 James E. Higgins, Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green, Manchester,
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning & Preventative Health Services, Inc. v. Smithpublic domain
ORDER SAM SPARKS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on the 17th, 18th, and 19th days of January 2017, the Court held a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared, in person or through counsel. This case concerns a § 1983 suit brought by five Texas Planned Parenthood health care providers (Proyider Plaintiffs) and seven known but anonymized Jane Does (Individual Plaintiffs) (coll
Vicki Marsh v. Genentech Inc.public domain
OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Vicki Marsh, Shay Blair, David Tiefenthal, and the Estate of Eddie Muniz (collectively, “Marsh”), the plaintiffs in these consolidated products-liability actions, brought suit against drug manufacturers Genentech, Inc. and Xoma (U.S.) LLC (collectively, “Genentech”) to recover for injuries allegedly sustained from
235 P.3d 1089 Jennifer Lee-Renee WEND, Petitioner
WITCHERS v. State of Oregonpublic domain
987 P.2d 1247 (1999) 163 Or. App. 298 Zachary Daniel WITHERS, Kiel Alan Peck and Seth Jeremy Ring, RespondentsCross-Appellants, v. STATE of Oregon, Appellant Cross-Respondent. Jennifer Ann Solman, Jennifer Renee Surdyk And Briana Jane Swanlund Hinchliffe, RespondentsCross-Appellants, v. State of Oregon, Appellant Cross-Respondent. (94CV0074TM and 96CV0623AB; CA A97204)
Steir v. Girl Scouts of the U.S.A.public domain
Nadeau, J. The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Barbadoro, C. J.) certified the following questions of law, see SUP. Ct. R. 34: (1) Does [RSA] 508:8 (1997) apply to a claim brought on behalf of a minor pursuant to the New Hampshire Law Against Discrimination? (2) Is either the Girl Scouts of the United States of America or a l
City of Eugene v. Statepublic domain
117 P.3d 1001 (2005) 339 Or. 113 CITY OF EUGENE, a municipal corporation, Petitioner-Respondent, v. STATE of Oregon, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent-Respondent, and Karen Jenkins, Diane Davidson, Arlyn Stepper, Gary Gillespie, Ann Montague, Judith Ann Sugnet, Gary Nauta, and Roger Garver, Intervenors-Appellants. Lane County, City of Eugene, Multnomah County, City of Portland, City of Roseburg, City of
Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences Universitypublic domain
*585DE MUNIZ, C. J. In this case, we address whether the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), specifically ORS 30.265(1) and ORS 30.270(1), as applied to this case, violates the Remedy Clause of Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution. ORS 30.265(1) provides, in part: “The sole cause of action for any tort of officers, employees or agents
Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Yostpublic domain
I. BACKGROUND a. The Act Ohio Senate Bill 145 (S.B. 145 or the Act), 132nd General Assembly (Ohio 2018) (codified at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15 ) was signed into law on December 21, 2018. The Act criminalizes, as of March 22, 2019, the performance of "dismemberment abortions." It states that: [n]o person shall knowingly perform or attempt to perform a dismemberment abortion wh
Barr v. Galvinpublic domain
793 F.Supp.2d 463 (2011) Bob BARR, Wayne A. Root, Libertarian Party of Massachusetts, and Libertarian National Committee, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. William F. GALVIN, as Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-11340-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 14, 2011. Matthew C. Baltay, Jennifer S. Behr, Andrew J. Pal