⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jensen v. The Hartford Life Group Insurance Company”

Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL
Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 32 F. Supp. 3d 894; 2014 WL 3686092; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102189
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge. On February 12, 2013, Plaintiff Berkeley Jensen (“Jensen”) filed his Complaint. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Relying on 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), Jensen seeks judicial review of benefit denials under his ERISA-disability plan. (Compl. at 1.) Defendants Federal E
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-10-17 · Published · cited 10× · 903 F. Supp. 2d 623; 2012 WL 5197681; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150876
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) brings this action for a declaratory judgment pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq., against Defendants Larry Taylor, Todd Gagliano, American Fire Assurance Company, and Jeffrey Mattsson, seeking a declaration that Hartford owes no coverage under t
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-06-25 · Published · cited 661× · 373 F.3d 998; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12841; 2004 WL 1418017
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge: Joan Hangarter, a chiropractor who operated her own business, obtained an “own occupation” disability insurance policy in 1989 from Paul Revere Life Insurance Company. She filed a claim for total disability in July 1997 based on shoulder, elbow, and wrist pain. Paul Revere paid Hangarter benefits for an eleven-month period and then terminated her benefi
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999-03-24 · Published · cited 11× · 593 N.W.2d 852; 226 Wis. 2d 23; 1999 Wisc. App. LEXIS 332
226 Wis.2d 23 (1999) 593 N.W.2d 852 MIDWAY MOTOR LODGE OF BROOKFIELD, a Wisconsin partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant,[†] v. The HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, a foreign insurer, Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Defendants-Respondents. No. 98-0615. Cour
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-3934 ___________ Alane King, as Conservator and * Natural Parent of Amber Lynn Schanus, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-03-16 · Published · cited 1× · 402 F.3d 876; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4316; 2005 WL 602961
ORDER We respectfully certify to the Nevada Supreme Court the question of law set forth in Section III of this order, pursuant to Nevada Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. The question of law will be determinative of the matter pending before this court, and there is no clearly controlling precedent in the decisions of the Nevada Supreme Court. All further proceedings
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017-07-20 · Published · cited 20× · 321 F.R.D. 383; 2017 WL 3085744
ORDER ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court are: (1) Plaintiff Judith Hancock’s motion to compel discovery (MTC *387(Dkt. # 44)); (2) Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), Boeing Company Employee Health and Welfare Plan (Plan 503) (“Plan 503”), and Employ
District Court, D. Nevada · 2003-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 276 F. Supp. 2d 1097; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13853; 2003 WL 21911448
276 F.Supp.2d 1097 (2003) OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation Plaintiff, v. Kevin JENSEN, M.D., et al., Defendants. No. CV-N-02-0252-LRH(VPC). United States District Court, D. Nevada. August 5, 2003. *1098 ORDER HICKS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This ac
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-02-09 · Published · cited 1× · 162 F. Supp. 3d 930; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16501; 2016 WL 493221
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Docket No. 20 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sanford Wishnev (“Wishnev”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Northwestern Mutual”), asserting that Defendant violated California’s usury law by charging him compo
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012-03-28 · Published · cited 9× · 864 F. Supp. 2d 1157; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47270; 2012 WL 1132499
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) The Hartford Fire Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment Declaring that the Terms of the Policy Issued to Gandy Dancer Do Not Provide Coverage for Roy D. Mercer, LLC’s Claims Against BNSF and Gandy Dancer, filed June 10, 2011 (Doc. 37)(“MSJ”); and (ii) BNSF Railway Company’s Ru
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-07-22 · Published · cited 164× · 414 F.3d 994; 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1518; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14935; 2005 WL 1704866
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.* This appeal involves the review of a decision by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”) to deny a claim for benefits under an employee benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. We reverse the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Hartford, and remand the
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014-05-08 · Published · cited 6× · 750 F.3d 995; 58 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1213; 2014 WL 1813156; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8652
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Jane Hall sued Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), alleging that MetLife abused its discretion in denying her claim to receive the proceeds of her late husband’s life insurance policy under an employee-benefit plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. The district court
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2016-12-01 · Published · cited 0× · 225 F. Supp. 3d 770; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165618; 2016 WL 7013871
*773OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT The Plaintiff, Brian Valenti, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, has sued the City of Hartford City, Indiana. (See Class Action Compl. for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Individual Compl. for Damages, ECF No. 1.) The Plaintiff asserts that Hartfo
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-11-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00464-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-03-10 · Published · cited 4× · 695 F. Supp. 2d 232; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21940; 2010 WL 891252
695 F.Supp.2d 232 (2010) Mary Karen ERBE, Executrix of the Estate of Edward Erbe, Plaintiff, v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-113. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 10, 2010. *234 James M. Fox, Ned J. Nakles, Jr., Nakles and Nakles, Latrobe, PA, for Plaintiff.
District Court, S.D. California · 2012-03-22 · Published · cited 3× · 861 F. Supp. 2d 1099; 2012 WL 987290; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39391
*1103ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE STANDARD OF REVIEW ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Now before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment to determine the appropriate standard of review on Plaintiff Ruben Gonzales’ disability insurance claims
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-12-27 · Published · cited 5× · 287 F.R.D. 590; 2012 WL 6737390
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these related class action cases, plaintiffs Vida F. Negrete (“Negrete”), as conservator for Everett Ow (“Ow”), and Carolyn B. Healey (“Healey”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of an estimated 200,000 senior citizens, allege that defendan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010-05-05 · Published · cited 132× · 603 F.3d 1182; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9235; 2010 WL 1783417
603 F.3d 1182 (2010) PJ, a minor, by and through his parents and natural guardians Barbara and Daren JENSEN; Daren Jensen, individually; Barbara Jensen, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Lars M. WAGNER, in his individual capacity; Karen H. Albritton, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and Kari Cunningham, in her individual capacity; Richard Anderson, in his individual and official capaciti