Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Jermaine Hinton”
UPTON v. the STATE.public domain
Coomer, Judge. Adolphus Upton appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He contends that his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance, and that he did not knowingly and voluntarily enter the plea. Although we find that Upton's plea was freely and voluntarily entered into and that he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel, we nonethele
Michael Jermaine Harris v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 26, 2013 Session MICHAEL JERMAINE HARRIS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 281168 Don W. Poole, Judge No. E2012-02226-CCA-R3-PC - Filed July 22, 2013 Petitioner, Michael Jermaine Harris, was convicted of aggravated arson in 2009 and was sentenced t
Loney v. New York State Department of Correctionspublic domain
632 F.Supp.2d 337 (2009) Jermaine LONEY, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. No. 08 Civ. 7026 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 2009. *340 Jermaine Loney, Gowanda, NY, pro se. DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. Pro se petition
Swaby v. New Yorkpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner-Appellant Jermaine Swaby appeals the April 7, 2014, Judgment of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Swaby was convicted after a jury trial on May 21, 2002, in New York State Supreme Court, Kings County, of murder in the second degree for shooting Shane Reynolds in the head five times. He was sentenced principally to a term of imprisonment of twenty-fi
Commonwealth v. Celesterpublic domain
Botsford, J. In September, 1995, a Plymouth County jury convicted the defendant, Jermaine Celester, of murder in the first degree on theories of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty and of armed assault with intent to murder. The victims, Wakime Woods and Derek Gibbs, were shot while walking with the defendant on the night of February 18, 1994. Woods died as a r
State v. Jordanpublic domain
651 S.E.2d 917 (2007) STATE of North Carolina v. Andrew Jermaine JORDAN. No. COA07-69. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 6, 2007. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Dahr Joseph Tanoury, for the State. Appellate Defender Staple Hughes, by Assistant Appellate Defender Charlesena Elliott Walker, for defendant appellant.
State v. Ohiopublic domain
[Cite as State v. Ohio, 2019-Ohio-790.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 107116 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
Ladmarald Cates v. United Statespublic domain
Sykes, Circuit Judge. On a summer day in 2010, Iema Lemons called 911 to report that her neighbors were vandalizing her home on Milwaukee's north side. Officer Ladmarald Cates and his partner responded, but the investigation went seriously off track. By an odd series of events, Cates and Lemons were left alone in her home, and the officer sexually assaulted her. Ca
Hinton v. Colemanpublic domain
LyoN, J. 1. The practice pursued in this case is somewhat peculiar. The last verdict therein was rendered in September, 1879, and- a motion for a new trial made immediately thereafter, founded upon “ the records, proceedings, and minutes of the judge.” This is no more nor less than a motion on the minutes of the judge, under sec. 2878, E. S., for on such a motion all the proceedings in the case, whether of record or not, are befo
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
KESSLER, J. ¶ 1. Adrian J. Jackson appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence which followed his guilty plea after the trial court denied his motion to suppress certain evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. Jackson asserts the warrant was in*167valid. We conclude that the warrant failed to establish the particularity required for the search of one unit i
State v. Deguair.public domain
Opinion of the Court by RECKTENWALD, C.J. This case arises from the murder of Jermaine Duckworth. On March 27, 2008, Duckworth’s body was discovered at the foot of a cliff on Yokohama Bay, a beach near Ka'ena Point on the island of 0‘ahu, Hawaii. On April 9, 2008, Patrick W. Deguair, Jr., was indicted for Duckworth’s murder and kidnapp
Mears v. McCulleypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LYNWOOD SMITH, District Judge. Jacob O’Neal Mears commenced this action against the City of Huntsville and one of its police officers, Brett McCulley, in the Circuit Court of Madison County, Alabama. Based upon the fact that plaintiffs state-court complaint appeared to assert at least two claims based upon the United States Constitution,1
State v. Coatespublic domain
[Cite as State v. Coates, 2025-Ohio-5340.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114534 v. : DENNIS COATES II, :
Bowen v. Gilliardpublic domain
Justice Brennan, with whom Justice Marshall joins, dissenting. Government in the modern age has assumed increasing responsibility for the welfare of its citizens. This expansion of *610responsibility has been accompanied by an increase in the scale and complexity of the activities that government conducts. Respect for the enorm
Gilliard v. Kirkpublic domain
633 F.Supp. 1529 (1986) Beaty Mae GILLIARD; Samuel Odell Davis; Lorraine Gilliard; Loretta Gilliard; Thomas Gilliard; Dana Gilliard; Gregory Gilliard; Reginald Gilliard; and Samuel Davis Jr. Gilliard, minors, by their mother and next friend, Beaty Mae Gilliard, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Phillip J. KIRK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, in his official capacity, and C. Barry M
Marilyn v. Statepublic domain
Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do