⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jerome W. Kowalski”

People v. Kowalskipublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2012-07-30 · Published · cited 202× · 492 Mich. 106; 821 N.W.2d 14; 2012 Mich. LEXIS 1225
CAVANAGH, J. (concurring). I concur in the result reached by the lead opinion. I agree with the lead opinion that the phenomenon of false confessions is counterintuitive and, thus, inconsistent with “ ‘the common-sense intuition that a reasonable person would be expected to lie, if at all, only in his own favor, and would not harm himself by his own words.’ ” <
Michigan Supreme Court · 2011-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan August 24, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Biscoe v. Kowalskipublic domain
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956-04-09 · Published · cited 16× · 290 S.W.2d 133; 1956 Mo. LEXIS 660
290 S.W.2d 133 (1956) William E. BISCOE, Appellant, v. John F. KOWALSKI and Jerome Carl Kowalski, by his father and guardian ad litem, John F. Kowalski, Respondents. No. 44859. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. April 9, 1956. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Denied May 14, 1956. *134 R. P. C. Wilso
Lanza v. Gonzalespublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 185 F. App'x 714
MEMORANDUM * Ana Maria Lanza petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order that upheld the decision of the immigration judge that Lanza’s asylum application was both untimely and without merit. This BIA order was entered after our previous remand in the case to clarify whether the BIA’s affirmance of the Immigration Judge was on timeliness grounds, and hence unreviewable or on the merits, an
Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986-09-08 · Published · cited 10× · 397 N.W.2d 320; 154 Mich. App. 390
154 Mich. App. 390 (1986) 397 N.W.2d 320 JEFFERSON SCHOOLS v. THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY Docket No. 88209. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 8, 1986. Butzel, Keidan, Simon, Myers & Graham (by Rodman N. Myers, Jerome S. Fanger and Mark L. Kowalsky), for petitioner. *391</
Morin v. Trupinpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1991-11-18 · Published · cited 52× · 778 F. Supp. 711; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17263; 1991 WL 253066
778 F.Supp. 711 (1991) Simeon MORIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barry H. TRUPIN, et al., Defendants. Norman E. GAAR, Plaintiffs, v. Barry H. TRUPIN, et al., Defendants. Michael P. ALBERTI, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barry H. TRUPIN, et al., Defendants. Nos. 88 Civ. 5743 (RWS), 89 Civ. 6639 (RWS), 90 Civ. 3475 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York.
District Court, S.D. New York · 1982-09-22 · Published · cited 3× · 547 F. Supp. 178; 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14697
547 F.Supp. 178 (1982) INTERSTATE PROPERTIES, Plaintiff, v. PYRAMID COMPANY OF UTICA, Robert J. Congel, Leonard Leveen, James McDonald, Joseph Scuderi, Gerald Dick, Woodchuck Hill Associates and Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association, Defendants. No. 81-Civ. 1874(RLC). United States District Court, S. D. New York. September 22, 1982.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984-03-27 · Published · cited 30× · 348 N.W.2d 614; 118 Wis. 2d 433; 1984 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3642
118 Wis.2d 433 (1984) 348 N.W.2d 614 James WHITE, Cindy White, Jennifer White, a minor, and Julie White, a minor, by their Guardian ad Litem, Michael J. Donovan, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Respondents,[†] v. GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, a domestic corporation, Lisa M. Kowalski and Jerome Kowalski, Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Appellants.[†] No. 83-303.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984-05-08 · Published · cited 76× · 734 F.2d 896; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22668
WINTER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Herbert L. Hutner appeals from Judge Carter’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants and dismissal of *898 his complaint on the ground that the contract he seeks to enforce lacks a material term under New York law. We affirm in part, rev
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013-05-21 · Published · cited 10× · 405 U.S. App. D.C. 130; 717 F.3d 189; 2013 WL 2157865; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10144
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2013 Decided May 21, 2013 No. 12-5170 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE TRUSTS, APPELLEE ANCHORAGE CAPITAL GROUP, L.L.C., ET AL., APPELLANTS v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, IN ITS CAPACITY AS RECEIVER OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983-01-13 · Published · cited 3× · 91 A.D.2d 137; 457 N.Y.S.2d 798; 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16106
OPINION OF THE COURT Murphy, P. J. Plaintiff Rocha Toussier y Asociados, S. C. (RTA) is a sociedad civile formed under Mexican law. A sociedad civile has features of both a corporation and a partnership. For purposes of this discussion, it will be termed an association. In 1980, RTA had three shareholders. Rodrigo Rocha owned 45%; his brother, Jose, owned 5%; Ellis Toussier controlled the
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1985-03-06 · Published · cited 2× · 108 F.R.D. 641; 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1373; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22040
DISCOVERY ORDER PAUL TREVOR SHARP, United States Magistrate. This matter is before the Court for a ruling on the motion of defendant Purcell Company, Inc. (Purcell) for a protective order, filed October 9, 1984. Counsel appeared at a hearing on the motion on December 14, 1984, at the United States Courthouse in Greensboro. *643Pu
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2026-04-13 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED April 13, 2026 Plaintiff-Appellee, 1:
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010-06-03 · Published · cited 1× · 723 F. Supp. 2d 929; 2010 A.M.C. 2668; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54498; 2010 WL 2291483
723 F.Supp.2d 929 (2010) Tommy ROGERS v. COASTAL TOWING, L.L.C. Civil Action No. 09-4259. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. June 3, 2010. *932 Joseph J. Weigand, Jr., Attorney at Law, Houma, LA, for Tommy Rogers. Jefferson Randolph Tillery, Catherine Barrett Rice, Jones Walker, New Orleans, LA, for Coastal Towi
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988-09-27 · Published · cited 4× · 429 N.W.2d 302; 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 893; 1988 WL 97936
Syllabus by the Court 1. Once a person is found to be incapacitated and is under an involuntary conservatorship, a finding of incapacity is necessary when the conservatorship is continued, unless the conservatee proves that she is no longer incapacitated. 2. A conservator may be removed if the conservator failed to provide for the best interests of the conservatee, and the best interests of conservatee will be better served by the appointment of a new
Bronner v. Dugganpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-02-04 · Published · cited 11× · 364 F. Supp. 3d 9
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This diversity action concerns a controversial topic in American academia: The movement to boycott Israeli academic institutions. Plaintiffs are current and former members of the American Studies Association ("ASA"), a nonprofit, charitable corporation dedicated to promoting the study of American culture. They have sued ASA and several
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007-02-15 · Published · cited 8× · 475 F. Supp. 2d 655; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15136; 2007 WL 576047
475 F.Supp.2d 655 (2007) ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Badriyyah Sabree, Defendants. No. 06-15021. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 15, 2007. *656 Jonathan B. Frank, Jackier, Gould, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Plaintiff. Jerome R. Watson,
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009-11-03 · Published · cited 68× · 779 N.W.2d 263; 286 Mich. App. 168
779 N.W.2d 263 (2009) 286 Mich. App. 168 PLUNKETT v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Docket No. 284320. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted September 9, 2009, at Lansing. Decided November 3, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. *265 Fieger, Fieger, Kenney, Johnson & Giroux, P.C. (by Victor S. Valenti)
Korwek v. Huntpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1986-12-30 · Published · cited 39× · 649 F. Supp. 1547; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15875
649 F.Supp. 1547 (1986) Philip KORWEK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nelson Bunker HUNT, et al., Defendants. No. 84 Civ. 7934 (MEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 1986. Deutsch & Frey, New York City, for plaintiffs; Herbert I. Deutsch, Robert E. Frey, Richard L. Weingarten, Neil Sussman (Law Clerk), of counsel. Finley, Kumble, Wagner,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1469 MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED; ATLANTIC GUNS, INCORPORATED; DEBORAH KAY MILLER; SUSAN BRANCATO VIZAS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and ANA SLIVEIRA; CHRISTINE BUNCH, Plaintiffs, v. LAWRENCE HOGAN, in his capacity as Governo