Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jerome W. Kowalski”
People v. Kowalskipublic domain
CAVANAGH, J. (concurring). I concur in the result reached by the lead opinion. I agree with the lead opinion that the phenomenon of false confessions is counterintuitive and, thus, inconsistent with “ ‘the common-sense intuition that a reasonable person would be expected to lie, if at all, only in his own favor, and would not harm himself by his own words.’ ” <
People of Michigan v. Jerome Walter Kowalskipublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan August 24, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Biscoe v. Kowalskipublic domain
290 S.W.2d 133 (1956) William E. BISCOE, Appellant, v. John F. KOWALSKI and Jerome Carl Kowalski, by his father and guardian ad litem, John F. Kowalski, Respondents. No. 44859. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. April 9, 1956. Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Denied May 14, 1956. *134 R. P. C. Wilso
Lanza v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Ana Maria Lanza petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order that upheld the decision of the immigration judge that Lanza’s asylum application was both untimely and without merit. This BIA order was entered after our previous remand in the case to clarify whether the BIA’s affirmance of the Immigration Judge was on timeliness grounds, and hence unreviewable or on the merits, an
Jefferson Schools v. Detroit Edison Co.public domain
154 Mich. App. 390 (1986) 397 N.W.2d 320 JEFFERSON SCHOOLS v. THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY Docket No. 88209. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 8, 1986. Butzel, Keidan, Simon, Myers & Graham (by Rodman N. Myers, Jerome S. Fanger and Mark L. Kowalsky), for petitioner. *391</
Morin v. Trupinpublic domain
778 F.Supp. 711 (1991) Simeon MORIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barry H. TRUPIN, et al., Defendants. Norman E. GAAR, Plaintiffs, v. Barry H. TRUPIN, et al., Defendants. Michael P. ALBERTI, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barry H. TRUPIN, et al., Defendants. Nos. 88 Civ. 5743 (RWS), 89 Civ. 6639 (RWS), 90 Civ. 3475 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Interstate Properties v. Pyramid Co. of Uticapublic domain
547 F.Supp. 178 (1982) INTERSTATE PROPERTIES, Plaintiff, v. PYRAMID COMPANY OF UTICA, Robert J. Congel, Leonard Leveen, James McDonald, Joseph Scuderi, Gerald Dick, Woodchuck Hill Associates and Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association, Defendants. No. 81-Civ. 1874(RLC). United States District Court, S. D. New York. September 22, 1982.
118 Wis.2d 433 (1984) 348 N.W.2d 614 James WHITE, Cindy White, Jennifer White, a minor, and Julie White, a minor, by their Guardian ad Litem, Michael J. Donovan, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Respondents,[] v. GENERAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, a domestic corporation, Lisa M. Kowalski and Jerome Kowalski, Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Appellants.[] No. 83-303.
WINTER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Herbert L. Hutner appeals from Judge Carter’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants and dismissal of *898 his complaint on the ground that the contract he seeks to enforce lacks a material term under New York law. We affirm in part, rev
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2013 Decided May 21, 2013 No. 12-5170 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE TRUSTS, APPELLEE ANCHORAGE CAPITAL GROUP, L.L.C., ET AL., APPELLANTS v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, IN ITS CAPACITY AS RECEIVER OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
Rocha Toussier y Asociados, S. C. v. Riveropublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Murphy, P. J. Plaintiff Rocha Toussier y Asociados, S. C. (RTA) is a sociedad civile formed under Mexican law. A sociedad civile has features of both a corporation and a partnership. For purposes of this discussion, it will be termed an association. In 1980, RTA had three shareholders. Rodrigo Rocha owned 45%; his brother, Jose, owned 5%; Ellis Toussier controlled the
O'Leary v. Purcell Co.public domain
DISCOVERY ORDER PAUL TREVOR SHARP, United States Magistrate. This matter is before the Court for a ruling on the motion of defendant Purcell Company, Inc. (Purcell) for a protective order, filed October 9, 1984. Counsel appeared at a hearing on the motion on December 14, 1984, at the United States Courthouse in Greensboro. *643Pu
People of Michigan v. James Lawrence Lewispublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED April 13, 2026 Plaintiff-Appellee, 1:
Rogers v. Coastal Towing, L.L.C.public domain
723 F.Supp.2d 929 (2010) Tommy ROGERS v. COASTAL TOWING, L.L.C. Civil Action No. 09-4259. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. June 3, 2010. *932 Joseph J. Weigand, Jr., Attorney at Law, Houma, LA, for Tommy Rogers. Jefferson Randolph Tillery, Catherine Barrett Rice, Jones Walker, New Orleans, LA, for Coastal Towi
In Re Conservatorship of Kocembapublic domain
Syllabus by the Court 1. Once a person is found to be incapacitated and is under an involuntary conservatorship, a finding of incapacity is necessary when the conservatorship is continued, unless the conservatee proves that she is no longer incapacitated. 2. A conservator may be removed if the conservator failed to provide for the best interests of the conservatee, and the best interests of conservatee will be better served by the appointment of a new
Bronner v. Dugganpublic domain
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This diversity action concerns a controversial topic in American academia: The movement to boycott Israeli academic institutions. Plaintiffs are current and former members of the American Studies Association ("ASA"), a nonprofit, charitable corporation dedicated to promoting the study of American culture. They have sued ASA and several
475 F.Supp.2d 655 (2007) ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Badriyyah Sabree, Defendants. No. 06-15021. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 15, 2007. *656 Jonathan B. Frank, Jackier, Gould, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Plaintiff. Jerome R. Watson,
Plunkett v. Department of Transportationpublic domain
779 N.W.2d 263 (2009) 286 Mich. App. 168 PLUNKETT v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Docket No. 284320. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted September 9, 2009, at Lansing. Decided November 3, 2009, at 9:15 a.m. *265 Fieger, Fieger, Kenney, Johnson & Giroux, P.C. (by Victor S. Valenti)
Korwek v. Huntpublic domain
649 F.Supp. 1547 (1986) Philip KORWEK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nelson Bunker HUNT, et al., Defendants. No. 84 Civ. 7934 (MEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 30, 1986. Deutsch & Frey, New York City, for plaintiffs; Herbert I. Deutsch, Robert E. Frey, Richard L. Weingarten, Neil Sussman (Law Clerk), of counsel. Finley, Kumble, Wagner,
Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Lawrence Hoganpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1469 MARYLAND SHALL ISSUE, INCORPORATED; ATLANTIC GUNS, INCORPORATED; DEBORAH KAY MILLER; SUSAN BRANCATO VIZAS, Plaintiffs – Appellants, and ANA SLIVEIRA; CHRISTINE BUNCH, Plaintiffs, v. LAWRENCE HOGAN, in his capacity as Governo