Cases

139 Nev., Advance Opinion le IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAVID MONK AS SPECIAL No. 82898 ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SHARON MONK, Appellant, vs. FILE HARRY CHING, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL; CHRISTOP

Adams, Judge. David Allen Newton was tried by a jury and convicted of burglary, theft by taking, and first degree forgery for taking jewelry while touring a home that he claimed he was interested in purchasing and using a fictitious name on a brokerage agreement. He was sentenced to twenty years for burglary, ten years for theft by taking to run concurrently with the burglary sentence, and ten years for forgery to run consec

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: *1376 This interlocutory appeal asks us to determine whether the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office ("HCSO"), in conducting child-protective investigations under a grant agreement with the Florida Department of Children and Families ("DCF"), acts as an arm of t

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 13, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAMONEZ DESHAUN THAXTON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2014-B-1662 J. Randall Wyatt, Jr., Judge No. M2016-00216-CCA-R3-CD – Filed November 2, 2016 The defendant, Lamonez Deshaun Thaxton, appeals his Davidson County Criminal Court jury convi

Benham, Justice. We granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari to consider a matter of first impression. As summarized by the Court of Appeals in Newton v. State, 319 Ga. App. 494 (736 SE2d 752) (2012), the facts are as follows: David Allen Newton was tried by a jury and convicted of burglary, theft by taking, and

McFarland, J. {¶ 1} Dustin A. Deckard appeals the judgment entry filed August 31, 2016 in the Gallia County Court of Common Pleas. Deckard was convicted by a jury on three counts: (1) illegal conveyance of drugs onto grounds of a detention facility, R.C. 2921.36(A)(2) ; (2) possession of drugs (heroin), R.C. 2925.11(A) ; and (3) possession of drugs (cocaine), R.C. 2925.11(A). On appeal, Appellant asserts three assignments

191 Ga. App. 701 (1989) 382 S.E.2d 726 LANCE v. THE STATE. A89A0726. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided May 26, 1989. H. Bradford Morris, Jr., for appellant. C. Andrew Fuller, District Attorney, Jessica K. Vaughn, Daniel A. Summer, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. BIRDSONG, Judge. Appellant Jame

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 563 OPINION Ruby Diane Watt filed suit under the Texas Tort Claims Act against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) alleging that prison officers at the Ferguson Unit in Madison County negligently caused the death of her son who was incarcerated in the unit at the ti

SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., ADAMS and MCFADDEN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/

NUMBER 13-05-785-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG GILBERT RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 404th District

NUMBER 13-05-785-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

ORDER HAYES, Judge The matter before the Court is the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs bring this action for medical negligence against the United States of America pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680.1 On October 27, 2015, the Court held a nine-day b

Per Curiam. These two related cases arise out of a child custody dispute involving the competing claims of the child’s natural parents (Cara and Daniel Schmidt) and the third-party custodians with whom the child now lives (Roberta and Jan DeBoer). While we will deal at length with the various arguments marshaled in support of their claims, we sum up our analysis of the competing arguments by reference to the wo

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

442 Mich. 648 (1993) 502 N.W.2d 649 In re CLAUSEN (DeBOER v. SCHMIDT) DeBOER v. DeBOER Docket Nos. 96366, 96441, 96531, 96532, (Calendar Nos. 1-2). Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued June 3, 1993. Decided July 2, 1993. Dissenting opinion filed July 8, 1993. Child Advocacy Law Clinic (by Suel

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

(2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Peter POLIZZI, Defendant. No. 06-CR-22 (JBW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction.....................................................................