Cases

Fisher v Lewis Constr. NYC Inc. (2020 NY Slip Op 00041) Fisher v Lewis Constr. NYC Inc. 2020 NY Slip Op 00041 Decided on January 2, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bur

FISHER, Senior Judge. Indiana’s property tax caps provide taxpayers with credits against their Indiana property tax liabilities. See, e.g., Ind.Code § 6-1.1-20.6-7.5 (2016). The amount of a credit.depends on, among other things, a property’s classification (e.g., homestead, residential, agricultural, or nonresidential) and its overall gros

FISHER, Senior Judge. Miller Pipeline Corporation has appealed from the Indiana Department of State Revenue’s denial of its claim for refund of sales/use taxes remitted for the 2006 and 2007 tax years (the years at issue). The issue before the Court is whether the Department erred in denying that refund claim. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

BY THE COURT: On June 29, 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers jointly promulgated the Clean Water Rule, 80 Fed. Reg. 37054 (June 29, *1320 2015), which defines the term “Waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. The next

Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI

DREW, J. h Keith Martin was convicted of two counts of second degree murder for killing the mother and grandmother of his children. The jury heard direct testimony from the defendant’s much-convicted brother, Jasper Martin, who claimed to have bought the defendant a Glock semi-automatic pistol only days before the slaughter. Jasper also claimed to be an eyewitness to part of the crime and an ear witness to

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

606 F.3d 1099 (2010) NAI YUAN JIANG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-73186. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009. Filed May 24, 2010. *1101 Helen A. Sklar, Stone & Grzegorek LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Alphan K. Tsoi, Tsoi &a;

ORDER The opinion filed May 24, 2010, slip op. 7355, is hereby withdrawn and a superseding opinion is filed herewith. No petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be entertained. See 9th Cir. G.O. 5.3(a). OPINION WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: Nai Yuan Jiang (“Jiang”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review

861 N.E.2d 1176 (2007) In re the Marriage of, Jeffrey LAMBERT, Appellant (Petitioner below), v. Jill LAMBERT, Appellee (Respondent below). No. 32S01-0604-CV-136. Supreme Court of Indiana. February 22, 2007. Mark Small, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Richard A. Clem, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee. Steve Carter, Attorney General of I

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2024 Term FILED _______________ November 13, 2024 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 24-75 C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK SUPREME COUR

611 F.3d 1086 (2010) NAI YUAN JIANG, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-73186. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009. Filed July 14, 2010. *1089 Helen A. Sklar, Stone & Grzegorek LLP, Los Angeles, CA, and Alphan K. Tsoi, Tsoi &

MEMORANDUM DECISION CONFIRMING THE TRUSTEE’S DETERMINATION OF CLAIMS RELATING TO SOFT DOLLAR COMMISSION CREDITS JAMES M. PECK, Bankruptcy Judge. Introduction This is the first time that any court has been asked to decide the question of whether so-called “soft dollar” claims qualify for treatment as customer claims under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2010 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

745 F.Supp.2d 115 (2010) FRANK SLOUP AND CRABS UNLIMITED, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Alan LOEFFLER, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Town of Islip Employee, Town of Islip, and Craig Pomroy, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Town of Islip Employee, Defendants. No. 05-CV-1766 (JFB)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 30, 2010.

KELLY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. Plaintiffs made an unusual decision in this case.1 They challenged only the constitutional amendment concerning same-gender marriage. Okla. Const, art. II, § 35. They ignored the earlier-enacted statutory provisions which define and only recognize marriage as between persons of opposit

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United . States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs, a group of current and former college student-athletes, move for an award of attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting this action. Defendant the National Collegiate Athletic Association opposes plaintiffs’ motion. The NCAA’s principal objection is that the request for fees includes work related to pros

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. Defendanb-Appellant United States (“the government”) appeals from the May 29, 2002 Order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granting summary judgment to Plaintiff-Appellee Maureen M. Britell (“Britell”) in this Little Tucker Act case seeking reimbursement for the cost of an abortion. The district court ruled that 10 U.S