Cases

ORDER ** The district court order granting summary judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court for reconsideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion,—U.S.—, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Filed 1/11/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT LAW OFFICE OF CARLOS R. B315375 PEREZ, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 19STCP04238) v. WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of t

460 F.3d 1253 TRUSTEES OF the CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust; Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust; Trustees for the Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.REDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY; Lake Mead Constructors, a joint venture between Kiewit Western Co., a Delaware corporation, and

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION  INDUSTRY AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST; TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS VACATION TRUST; TRUSTEES FOR THE SOUTHERN NEVADA LABORERS LOCAL 872 TRAINING TRUST, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. N

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 4, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court _______

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs/Appellants. (“the Joint Trustees”) prevailed in an action to collect delinquent benefit contributions owed to trusts established under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The Joint Trustees then sought an award of “reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of the action” under ERISA pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2)(D). The district court granted some of the req

IN BANC. Proceeding in the matter of the estate of Thomas Henry Edwards, deceased, instituted by Martha Virginia Edwards Earle against the Security Savings Trust Company of Portland, and others for the purpose of setting aside the will of said decedent. From a decree sustaining the will, contestant appeals. AFFIRMED. REHEARING DENIED. This is a controversy concerning the validity of the alleged will of Thomas Henry Edwards, executed February 21, 1929, in Portland, Oregon.

ROSSMAN, J. This is a controversy concerning the validity of the alleged will of Thomas Henry Edwards, executed February 21, 1929, in Portland, Ore*596gon. Edwards died September 16, 1929, in San Diego, California, aged 59 years. The will was presented for probate in common form to the circuit court (probate department) of Multnomah county, and was so admitted September 2

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On