Cases

LOKEN, Chief Judge. After a three-day trial, the jury convicted Pablo Marquez and Gustavo Luna of possession with intent to distribute 1,866 kilograms of marijuana found by the Missouri State Highway Patrol hidden in a commercial trailer Marquez and Luna were driving from El Paso, Texas, to New Haven, Michigan, ostensibly to deliver a load of insulation material. Marquez and Lun

972 A.2d 86 (2009) In re Nominating Petition of Angela GERENA. Appeal of Israel Alfaro. In re Nominating Petition of Eduardo Mercado. Appeal of Joanna Lopez. In re Nominating Petition of Miguel Angel DeJesus. Appeal of Milsa Rodriguez. In re Nominating Petition of Maria Feliciano. Appeal of Elise Eseranza-Perez. In re Nominating Petition of Zenaida Cosme. Appeal of Linda Soto. In re Nominating Petition of Maria San

NUMBER 13-14-00323-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. de C.V., OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS, AND OSA INTERNATIONAL On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1739 JANET VAZQUEZ-VELAZQUEZ; RAMON A. DEL VALLE-LOPEZ; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DEL VALLE-VAZQUEZ; CARLOS R. CESPEDES-GOMEZ; JOCELYN CALO-BIRRIEL; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CESPEDES-CALO; SAUL O. ALMEDA-CRUZ; JUDITH NIEVES-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALMEDA- NIEVES; FRANCISCO M. ALVARADO-BARRIOS; MARILYN ALVAREZ-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALVARADO-ALVAREZ; JUAN C. ARROYO-RAMIREZ; DAMARIS VELEZ-RIOS;

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1377 JOSE A. RIVERA-PINA; DENISE MALAVE-FONSECA; ELIZABETH BRUNO-ORTEGA; EUNICE A. ROSARIO-ABREU; GUILLERMO E. DE LA CRUZ-ABREU; IRIS N. FLORES-CARABALLO; JAVIER RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ; JUAN C. ROMANACCE-RODRIGUEZ; LISBETH DE LEON-MARQUEZ; LUZ J. GARCIA-ORTIZ; MARISELA FIGUEROA-VEGA; RICHARD RIVERA-CANALES; ROLANDO A. LOPEZ-SOSA; RUBEN RODRIGUEZ-JIMENEZ; HOWARD DE LEON-ROD

MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 ’ ’ On June 11, 2014, relators Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (“Oceanografía”), Otto Candies, LLC (“Otto Candies”), Candies Mexican Investments (“Candies Mexican”), and OSA International, filed a petition for writ of ma

180 F.3d 199 Luis Fernando ALVIDRES-REYES; Daniel Nunez; Rosana Diaz;Ricardo Flores; Jose Manuel Lopez; Juan Sedillo; MiguelAngel Perea; Julio Puentes; Jose Manuel Adame; Genaro Amaro;Armando Palomino; Vicente Chavez; Estela Hernandez; SandraCasado; Jesus Regalado; Eduardo Rubio; Roberto Vargas; JosePilar Morales; Arturo Martinez; Amelia Trujillo-Carmona;Esperanza Garcia; Francisca Medrano; Guadalupe Vasquez;Lilia Gonzal

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Norberto Lopez Cruz (“Plaintiff’) filed an Amended Complaint on October 14, 2011 (Docket No. 29) against Defendants Puerto Rico Power Authority (“PREPA”), Otoniel Cruz Carrillo (“Cruz”), Luis A. Soto De Jesus (“Soto”), Hiran Gomez Canals (“Gomez”), all in their individual capacities (collectivel

13 F.Supp.2d 147 (1998) The COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO on its own behalf, and as Public Trustee and as Parens Patriae for the Citizens of the Commonwealth, the Environmental Quality Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Department of Natural Resources of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Plaintiffs, v. The M/V EMILY S and the Barge Morris J. Berman, in rem; Metlife Capital Corporation, Peter Frank, Bunker Group Puerto Rico, Inc., Bunke

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1080 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

427 F.Supp.2d 737 (2006) Fermin COLINDRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUIETFLEX MANUFACTURING, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. H-01-4319, CIV.A. H-01-4323. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2006. *738 *739 David G. Hinojosa, David Herrera Urias, Nina Perales, Ma

14 Cal.App.4th 1692 (1993) 19 Cal. Rptr.2d 555 THE PEOPLE EX REL. JOSEFINA SEPULVEDA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HIGHLAND FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B058411. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. January 26, 1993. *1697 COUNS

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, fifty resident aliens, brought this suit for mandamus, declaratory, and injunctive relief in the district court seeking to compel the Attorney General of the United States (“Attorney General”) and the Immigration & Naturalization Service (“INS”) to consider their applications for suspension of deportation under a now-repealed provision of