Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Jesus Garcia v. Angie Lee”
in Re Vcc, LLC, Vratsinas Construction Co., Nato Garcia D/B/A Nato Garcia Company, and Phi Service Agency, Inc.public domain
FILED 17-0818 12/22/2017 11:17 AM tex-21458098 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHOR
In re ROC Pretrialpublic domain
We are asked to consider whether a nonsuit order is void to the extent it dismisses claims not encompassed by the motion for nonsuit. We hold the order is not void and therefore dismiss the appeals of 155 appellants against nine appellees. Factual and Procedural Background This appeal arises out of a mass tort action that consolidated eighteen cases involving over eight thousand plaintiffs and over thirty defendants. The notice of appeal and t
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,
Wieland v. Assaf (In re Briones-Coroy)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK