Cases

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII JESÚS MORENO REVISIÓN PÉREZ ADMINISTRATIVA Procedente del Recurrente Departamento de Corrección y v. KLRA202500200 Rehabilitació

OPINION ESPINOSA, Judge. ¶ 1 After a vehicle was stopped for a window tint violation and a load of marijuana discovered within, a jury convicted Jesus Moreno of conspiracy to commit transportation of marijuana for sale, transportation of marijuana for sale, possession of marijuana for sale, possession of drug paraphernalia, and misconduct involving weapo

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, denied. Same case below, 406 Ill. App. 3d 1209, 376 Ill. Dec. 173, 998 N.E.2d 715.

Opinion KING, J. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant was convicted by a jury of first degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a).)1 The jury also found true an allegation that, in committing the murder, defendant personally used a deadly and dangerous weapon, a knife. (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1).) In a bifurcated trial, the court found true allegations that defendant had suff

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-192-CR JESUS TOVAR MORENO A/K/A APPELLANT JESUS T. MORENO V. THE ST

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-192-CR JESUS TOVAR MORENO A/K/A

104 P.3d 628 (2005) 197 Or. App. 59 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Isidro Jesus MORENO, Appellant. 02CR 0426; A119340. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted October 26, 2004. Decided January 12, 2005. Rankin Johnson IV, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Peter A. Oza

MEMORANDUM ** Jesus Lizarraga Moreno appeals from his guilty-plea convictions and 240-month sentence for distribution of methamphetamine, being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, and being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii), 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), respectively, with an enhancement for a

MEMORANDUM ** The parties’ joint motion for summary reversal and remand is granted, and defendant’s sentence is vacated. See United States v. Vidal, 504 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc). This appeal is remanded to the district court for the purpose of re-sentencing defendant. VACATED and REMANDED. This disposition is n

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered March 12, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient

*644MEMORANDUM ** Gilberto Jesus Bautista-Moreno, and his wife Teresa De Jesus Cordero-Medrano, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings, arising from the underlying denial of their applications for cancellation of removal based on their failure

*644MEMORANDUM ** Gilberto Jesus Bautista-Moreno, and his wife Teresa De Jesus Cordero-Medrano, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings, arising from the underlying denial of their applications for cancellation of removal based on their failure

PER CURIAM: The Petition for Rehearing is denied and the Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also denied.

PER CURIAM: * Jesus Negrete Moreno appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. Moreno was sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment, which constituted an upward variance from his advisory Guidelines sentencing range. The advisory Guidelines sentencing range was 10 to 16 months. Moreno contends his sentence should be vacated as substanti

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a conviction by the District Court, sitting without a jury, of two counts of federal narcotics violations. 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a). The only issue, both in the trial court and here, is whether the heroin admitted in evidence was illegally seized in violation of the Fourth

NUMBER 13-98-316-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ____________________________________________________________________ JESUS ESTEVAN MORENO ESCOBAR, Appellant, v.

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Jesus Ivan Lopez filed state law claims in state court against Sentrillion Corporation, a general contractor, for injuries he sustained during a construction project for the United States Custom and Border Protection. Sentrillion filed third-party indemnity and contribution claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) against the United S

55 Cal.Rptr.3d 523 (2007) 40 Cal.4th 859 152 P.3d 1100 In re JESUS O., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jesus O., Defendant and Appellant. No. S140865. Supreme Court of California. March 8, 2007. *524 Patricia Ihara, under ap

PER CURIAM: * Jesus Sotelo-Moreno appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sotelo-Moreno contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one under the le