Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jewell McCrary”
Jewel Tea Company, Inc. v. McCrarypublic domain
This appeal is from a judgment for $1,500 on a jury's verdict finding that H. W. Jonakin was negligent in driving a Jewel Tea Company automobile, as a consequence of which appellee sustained personal injuries. The gravel highway on which appellee was driving his Chevrolet car south from Forrest City is about thirty feet wide. Appellee testified that he slowed to 25 or 30 miles an hour to pass a cattle truck, a part of which was parked on the highway, occupying three or four feet of the
McCrary v. Statepublic domain
529 S.W.2d 467 (1975) Ronald McCRARY, Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent. No. 36400. Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Three. September 23, 1975. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied October 22, 1975. *468 Charles D. Kitchin, Public Defender, and Kent Fanning,
McCrary v. Bill McCarty Const. Co., Inc.public domain
591 P.2d 683 (1979) 92 N.M. 552 Leonard E. McCRARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BILL McCARTY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a New Mexico Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 3413. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. February 6, 1979. *684 Michael D. Bustamante, Ortega & Snead, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellant.
Barlowe v. Statepublic domain
648 S.E.2d 471 (2007) BARLOWE v. The STATE. No. A07A0769. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 25, 2007. *472 Jason S. Monroe, Atlanta, for appellant. Jewel C. Scott, District Attorney, Jonathan O. Oden, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. Mark Whitney Barlowe appeals from the denial of his
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 26, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00264-CV JOHN-HENRY AYANBADEJO, Appellant V. CHANEL GOOSBY AND ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., Appellees On Appeal from the 151st District Court
Merry Homes, Inc. v. Luc Daopublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 19, 2017. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-16-00724-CV MERRY HOMES, INC., Appellant V. LUC DAO, Appellee On Appeal from the 151st District Court Harris County, Texas Tri
Jewell v. Davies, U.S. District Judgepublic domain
HICKS, Chief Judge. This is a petition by Bishop M. L. Jewell, as Chief Overseer and Supreme Head of the Church of the Living God, the Pillar and Ground of the Truth, for a writ of mandamus to compel the Judge of the District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to dissolve a stay order entered on April 5, 1951, in the case of
Green v. Noccieropublic domain
676 F.3d 748 (2012) Percy GREEN, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul NOCCIERO, Secretary of the Board of Police Commissioners, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-2037. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 12, 2012. Filed: April 20, 2012. *749 Robert James Reinhold, argued, St. Louis,
Commonwealth v. Jewellpublic domain
Certifying the Law — On the trial of the appellee charged with having violated section 1477a of the Kentucky Statutes in the making of an alleged false oath as to the place of his residence for the purpose of voting in the general election of 1931, he was found not guilty under a peremptory instruction of the court given to the jury at the close of the commonwealth's case. The commonwealth has appealed for the purpose of having the law certified. The evidence adduced by th
Rood v. Rosen (In re Rood)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Appellants Robert F. Rood, IV, and Charles Timothy Jewell appeal from a November 4, 2011, judgment against them in a bankruptcy adversary proceeding in accordance with a memorandum of decision issued September 26, 2011.1 The issues are fully briefed and the court now rules pursuant to Local Rule 105.6, no hearing being de
' MEMORANDUM OPINION HENRY WOODS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This Court issued its Memorandum Opinion on April 13, 1984, Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al, 584 F.Supp. 328 (ED Ark.1984) finding, among other things, that the defendant districts had engaged in uncon*1222
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 31, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00172-CV DR. JOEL JOSELEVITZ, Appellant V. CAROL ROANE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND COX MEDIA GROUP, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas
Welch v. Contreraspublic domain
174 S.W.3d 53 (2005) Kory A. WELCH, Appellant, v. Eli CONTRERAS, et al., Respondents. No. WD 64832. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. October 25, 2005. *54 James E. Kiley, Jr., Overland Park, KS, for appellant. David M. Druten, Overland Park, KS, for respondents. Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., JAMES M. SM
Affirmed in part, Reversed and Rendered in part, and Memorandum Opinion filed April 16, 2019. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00480-CV DEALER COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., Appellant v. DCT HOLLISTER RD, LLC; STAPLES, INC.; NORTHWEST CROSSING ASSOCIATION, INC.; FIRSTSERVICE RESIDENTIAL HOUSTON, INC.; KEITH GROTHAUS; VICTORIA BROWN; AND JARED HO
State v. Chavezpublic domain
173 P.3d 48 (2007) 2007-NMCA-162 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly Rose CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 25,490. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. October 11, 2007. Certiorari Denied November 20, 2007. *50 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, M. Anne Kelly, Assist
Clay v. Weberpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 280 [¶ 1.] Leander Clay, Kenneth Muetze, and James Smith (collectively referred to as Inmates) reside in the South Dakota State Penitentiary (SDSP). They brought this suit for declaratory judgment against prison administrators Douglas Weber, Tim Reisch, and Jeff Bloomberg (collectively referred to as Administrat
Dykes v. Marco Group, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM Padova, District Judge Plaintiff Eugene Dykes filed this employment discrimination action against Defendants The Marco Group, Inc. and Educations Affiliates, Inc. after he was terminated from his job as a welding instructor. He asserts claims of race discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C § 1981, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. Defend
Marshall v. Columbus Steel Supplypublic domain
187 N.W.2d 607 (1971) 187 Neb. 102 John MARSHALL, Appellant, v. COLUMBUS STEEL SUPPLY, Appellee. No. 37849. Supreme Court of Nebraska. June 4, 1971. *608 Moyer & Moyer, Madison, for appellant. Jewell, Otte, Pollock & Gatz, Norfolk, for appellee. Heard before WHITE, C. J., and SPENCER,
Cortes v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
700 F.Supp.2d 474 (2010) Frankie CORTES, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 4805(LTS)(RLE). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 30, 2010. *478 Timothy Patrick Devane, Timothy P. Devane, Attorney at Law, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Donna Anne Canfield, New York, City Law Depa
Elston v. Statepublic domain
Reginald Elston appeals from his conviction for the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance and his sentence to 28 years' imprisonment. Elston was sentenced pursuant to Alabama's Habitual Felony Offender Act, see § 13A-5-9, Code of Alabama 1975, and his 28-year sentence includes 5 years' enhancement because the sale occurred on or near a schoolyard, see §13A-12-250, Code of Alabama 1975, an