Cases

RILEY, Chief Judge. On the morning Christopher Kelley’s arson trial was to begin, Kelley moved for substitute counsel or, alternatively, to proceed pro se. The district court 1 denied the motion. At trial, a jury found Kelley guilty on both arson counts. Kelley directly appealed the district court’s orders regarding his

292 S.W.3d 297 (2009) Billy Joe KELLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 08-926. Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 5, 2009. *298 Bill Luppen, Little Rock, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att'y Gen., by Brad Newman, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice. A Pulaski Co

SNELL, Justice (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. Large principles and far reaching consequences are sometimes born from small cases. That is the situation here. Jim Kelley, plaintiff, owned a house that he rented to Penny Ball. The police broke into the house in order to arrest William Vary, a frequent guest of Ball. In doing so, the police damaged two doors for which Kelley asks to be

RILEY, Chief Judge. A grand jury indicted Christopher Kelley on two counts of arson. Before trial, Kelley moved to have his court appointed attorney replaced. The magistrate judge denied Kelley’s motion. On the morning Kelley’s trial was to begin, Kelley moved for substitute counsel or, alternatively, to proceed pro se. The district court denied the motion. At trial, a jury foun

210 S.W.3d 93 (2005) STATE of Arkansas, Appellant, v. Harold Jerome KELLEY, Appellee. No. CR 04-1300. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 16, 2005. *95 Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Clayton K. Hodges, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellant. Terrence Cain, Little Rock, for appellee. JIM GUNTER, Justice. This i

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} In February 2004, appellant, Shawn P. Kelley, filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Richland County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel *433appellee, his prison warden,1 to release him from confinement. On February 25, the court of appeals dismissed the petition. Shawn P. Kelley, pro se

266 S.W.3d 734 (2007) Angela KELLEY, Appellant, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Appellees. No. 07-367. Supreme Court of Arkansas. November 1, 2007. *736 Gary Eubanks & Associates, by: Russell Marlin, Little Rock, for appellant. Kilpatrick, Williams, Smith & Meeks, LLP, by

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: I. A. The plaintiffs are death row inmates residing on the Northeast Unit (the “Unit”) of Union Correctional Institution, (“UCI”) in Raiford, Florida. Their complaint — filed in August 2000 — alleges that the high temperatures in their cells during the summer months amount to “cruel and unusual punishm

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS The sole issue presented by this petition for extraordinary relief is whether certain employees of the Alabama Department of Transportation ("ALDOT"), who are defendants in an action pending in the Barbour Circuit Court, are entitled to discretionary-function immunity under the provisions of § 14, Ala. Const. 1901. After the trial court denied these defendants' motion for summary judgment and also

29 Kan. App.2d 836 (2001) 32 P.3d 1205 JENSEN INTERNATIONAL, INC., J. B. JENSEN, and DONNA JENSEN, Appellants, v. GRADY KELLEY and JOE RINKENBAUGH, Appellees. No. 86,414. Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed September 28, 2001. Michael James King and M. Jean Holmes, of Winters, King & Associates, P.C., and Douglas G.

This is a post-divorce case. James Eric Mitchell (father) and Deborah Kay Mitchell Kelley (mother) were divorced in October 1986. The divorce judgment awarded custody of the parties' three minor children to the mother and, inter alia, ordered the father to pay $550 per month in child support. In April 1991, the mother filed a petition to modify the divorce judgment, requesting an increase in child support and post-minority support for the college expenses of the oldest c

51 F.Supp.2d 910 (1999) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Melvin KELLEY, Petitioner, v. Augustus SCOTT, Jr., Warden, Lincoln Correctional Center, and Jim Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Respondents. No. 98 C 5525. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 21, 1999. *911 Melvin Kelley, Eas

OPINION KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice. This appeal arises out of a judgment based upon claims for statutory fraud under Chapter 27 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of a husband and wife based upon a favorable jury verdict on their statutory-fraud claims against various defendants. On appeal, the defendants

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Robert Kelley, Sharon George, Jim Kelley, Delores Stutler, Wilma Jones, George Kelley, FILED and Sharon Ann Kelley, Plaintiffs Below, November 23, 2015 Petitioners RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3717 ___________________________ Jim Harris, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. Ian Wallace

899 F.2d 612 16 Fed.R.Serv.3d 490 Sammie KELLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Kenneth McGINNIS, Director for the Department ofCorrections,* James H. Thieret, SandraMcDonough, Alan L. Frentzel, Michael W. Frazer, JerryBradley, Gary D. Slutz, Beverly Clark, Ronald M. Shansky,M.D., Jim Greer, Michael W. Carter, Eric Daly, and L.V.Lipe, Defendants-

PER CURIAM. Sammie Kelley, Jr., a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. For the reasons stated below, we reverse and remand. I. In his complaint, Kelley alleges that since July 1984 he has suffered from chronic foot problems and that defendants, state prison officials and Menard

LEHAN, Judge. The state appeals an order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant’s apartment. We reverse. The officers in this case were investigating a burglary. The victim of the burglary had reported to the police that she had found two items of her stolen property behind defendant’s apartment. The two police officers, one in uniform and one in plainclothes, knocked

444 N.W.2d 836 (1989) DAVID COMPANY, Respondent, v. JIM W. MILLER CONSTRUCTION, INC., Petitioner, Appellant. Nos. C6-88-327, C4-88-830. Supreme Court of Minnesota. September 8, 1989. *837 Ronald E. Martell, Malcom J. McDonald, Leonard W. Glewwe, Moore, Costello & Hart, St. Paul, for appellant. Philip L. Bruner, Sue Hal

PER CURIAM. It appearing that both the acts constituting a violation of probation and commence*93ment of the revocation proceedings which led to the order revoking probation appealed here occurred well beyond termination of the probationary period, we reverse and direct that appellant be discharged. Kimble v. State, 396 So.2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Gardn