Cases

Case: 22-10441 Document: 00517052310 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10441 ____________

Case: 22-10441 Document: 00517065342 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2024 REVISED February 15, 2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-10441

BRIAN S. MILLER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Tina Jimerson's petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted as to her Brady and Youngblood claims and denied as to her actual innocence claim; her convictions are vacated, and she is ordered released from the Arkansas Department of Correction within thirty days. Jimerson's motion to cite additional authority [Doc. No. 68] is granted, and her motion to expand the recor

*1140TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, dissenting. This case presents a close call on reasonable suspicion. But the essence of qualified immunity is to give government officials protection in resolving close calls in reasonable ways. Because the majority employs a divide-and-conquer analysis specifically rejected by the Supreme Court and because Vasquez cannot i

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONFIRMING PLAN1 Paul Baisier, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge The above-captioned case came before the Court on November 10, 2016 (the “Hearing”) for confirmation of a Chapter *43213 plan of reorganization (Docket No. 46) (the “Plan”) proposed by the Debtor.2 At the

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This court admitted respondent, Aziza D. Jimerson of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0071631, to the practice of law in Ohio in 1999. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years, conditionally staying the last six months, because she abandoned a client’s personal-injury case and failed to cooperate approp

PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Robert James Jimerson, appeals from a judgment of the District Court 1 in favor of defendant Kisco Company, Inc. (Kisco). Plaintiffs suit was brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1970), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2

JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the court: Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Cook County, the defendant, Verneal Jimerson, was convicted of the murder of two persons. The defendant waived his right to a jury for purposes of a death penalty hearing, and the trial judge sentenced the defendant to death for the offen

NO. 07-08-00281-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D ----------------------------------------------------

NO. 07-08-00281-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

NO. 07-08-00281-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 19, 2010 BRANDON LEWIS, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FRO

404 F.Supp. 338 (1975) Robert James JIMERSON, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. KISCO COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. 74-155C(4). United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D. November 5, 1975. *339 Forriss D. Elliott Law Office, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff. Samuel C. Ebling,

WARD, Judge. Arthur Lewis and a co-defendant were charged with first degree murder committed during the perpetration of an armed robbery. Lewis pled not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. After a sanity hearing on March 6, 1990 he was found competent to stand trial. The trial court ordered a severance of the charges against Lewis and Fleury. After a trial, a petit jury found Lewis guilty as charged. Fleu-ry pled gu

TED DUNN V STATE NO. 07-98-0126-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 5, 1998 ______________________________ TED L

NO. 07-98-0126-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 5, 1998 ______________________________ TED LEWIS DUNN, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE ________

465 F.3d 46 Kent PAPINEAU, Plaintiff,Nedrick Ashton, Clay Rockwell, Abilene Rockwell, Houston Rockwell, Onenhaida Rockwell and Juanita Lewis, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants,Shawn Jones, Andrew Jones, Stonehorse Goeman, Marie Peters, Wealthy Bucktooth, individually and as guardian ad litem for Holly Lyons, Robert E. Bucktooth Jr., Cheryl Bucktooth, individually and as guardian ad litem for Nadine and Rob Bucktooth, Martha Bucktooth, Roberta B

653 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2009) The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BLUE TEE CORP., et al., Defendants. Case No. 03-CV-0846-CVE-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. September 2, 2009. *1169 Joseph H. Bates, III, Carney Williams Bates Bozeman & Pulliam PLLC, Little *1170

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. MACKINS NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

305 S.W.3d 859 (2010) Darnell HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-09-00006-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted October 21, 2009. Decided February 4, 2010. Rehearing Overruled March 9, 2010. *861 Donald F. Killingsworth, Killingsworth Law Office, Tyler, f

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2077 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Anthony Ward Defendant - Appel