⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Jimmy Tangle”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002-12-03 · Published · cited 11× · 313 F.3d 653; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24495; 2002 WL 31696739
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. The majority takes it upon itself to resolve a question that it need not reach in order to dispose of the present case. Moreover, it does so even though this Court has previously held that we should not reach the merits of this very Sentencing Guidelines issue unless we first conclude that the defendant received a higher sentence than he would have receiv
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970-10-02 · Published · cited 19× · 429 F.2d 489
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge: On June 3, 1969, the grand jury for the Northern District of Texas, at Lubbock, charged this appellant, Jimmy Joiner, with having unlawfully, knowingly, and feloniously aided and abetted the President of the Lorenzo State Bank in the misapplication of $82,676.67 of the funds of that bank. That part of the indictment [Count 3] which resulted in a convictio
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-09-20 · Published · cited 1× · 816 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106178; 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 767
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. Plaintiffs are nine officers in the Library of Congress Police who were transferred to the U.S. Capitol Police pursuant Congress’s merging of the two forces. 1 Under this merger, LOC police who met certain requirements were transfer
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016-02-05 · Published · cited 2× · 481 S.W.3d 855; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 86
JEFFREY W. BATES, J. This is the second appeal arising from the dissolution proceeding involving the marriage of Mark Bell (Mark) and Jeneffer Bell (Jeneffer). See Bell v. Bell, 360 S.W13d.270 (Mo.App. S.D.2011) (Bell I) 1 Mark and his father, Jimmie Bell (Jimm
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007-08-27 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Chapman and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, and upon reconsideration, the Full Commission affirms in part and modifies in part the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-10-29 · Published · cited 31× · 907 F.3d 901
COOK, Circuit Judge. Edmund Zagorski, a Tennessee capital prisoner, appeals from the district court's denial of relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), asserting that his impending execution, an intervening Supreme Court decision, and the merits of three procedurally defaulted constitutional claims mandate equitable relief. Giving due deference to the district
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2012-12-04 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 4, 2012. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-00449-CR COREY DESHUN FARROW, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 180th District Court Harris County, Texas
Seraj v. Dubermanpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 0× · 789 S.E.2d 551; 248 N.C. App. 589; 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 815
HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge. *589 Plaintiff appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants. The trial court stated Plaintiff failed to introduce *590 evid
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006-06-12 · Published · cited 2× · 209 S.W.3d 63; 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 395
OPINION WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., delivered the opinion of the court, in which WILLIAM B. CAIN and FRANK G. CLEMENT, JR., JJ., joined. This appeal involves the constitutionality of a sales and use tax assessment against an out-of-state seller of pre-engineered metal buildings. After conducting an audit, the Tennessee Department of Revenue assessed the seller $652,369.68 in uncollected sales and use t
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014-08-04 · Published · cited 1× · 515 B.R. 218
ORDER Randy D. Doub, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment filed by the Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”) on January 7, 2014, the Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment filed by Montague Farms, Inc. (“Montague”) on January 30, 2014, and the Su
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 544 F. App'x 642
CLAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant James Lykins appeals from his conviction by a jury on two counts: manufacturing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Specifically, Defendant appeals: (1) the district court’s denial of Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his home; (2) the district court’s admission
Vasquez v. Davispublic domain
District Court, D. Colorado · 2016-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 226 F. Supp. 3d 1189; 2016 WL 7451425; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179288
ORDER ON PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jimmy Joseph Vasquez is an inmate in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (“CDOC”) and housed at the Sterling Correctional Facility (“Sterling”). (ECF No. 113 ¶ 1.) He is infected with the hepatitis C virus (“HCV”). (Id. ¶ 42.) Vasquez brings this lawsuit under the Eighth Amendme
District Court, District of Columbia · 2011-09-22 · Published · cited 12× · 813 F. Supp. 2d 61; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108201; 2011 WL 4430807
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. Plaintiff, Winfred Wilkerson (“Wilkerson” or “plaintiff’), brought an employment-discrimination action against his employer, Wackenhut Protective Services, *62 Inc. 1
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2008-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-225-CV VICKI PRESLEY, AS NEXT FRIEND APPELLANT OF SHAWN DAVIS, DECEASED V. REPUBLIC ENERGY DRILLING, L.L.C. APPELLEE ------------ FROM THE 15
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005-03-09 · Published · cited 6× · 205 S.W.3d 801; 90 Ark. App. 223
205 S.W.3d 801 (2005) Treenya MAXWELL, Appellant, v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Appellee. No. CA 03-1007. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division IV. March 9, 2005. *802 David Mark Gunter, Hope, for appellant. Gray Allen Turner, Gunter, for appellee. TERRY CRABTREE, Judge. On January 28, 2003, the
State v. Cliftonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005-08-04 · Published · cited 27× · 701 N.W.2d 793; 2005 Minn. LEXIS 466; 2005 WL 1836929
OPINION ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice. Appellant Brian Alexander Clifton was convicted, following a jury trial in Henne-pin County District Court, of premeditated first-degree murder for the shooting death of Steven Earl Nix and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, Clifton asserts he was denied a fair trial by the admission of evidence that a state’s witness had been threatened after testifying at an e
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2008-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2008-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-225-CV VICKI PRESLEY, AS NEXT FRIEND APPELLANT OF SHAWN DAVIS, DECEASED V
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 773 So. 2d 365; 2000 Miss. App. LEXIS 270; 2000 WL 722602
IRVING, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This action arises out of an incident that occurred on February 28, 1995, wherein Stanley Harried suffered severe and permanent injuries from electrical burns to his body when he came into contact with an electrical wire owned by Southwest Mississippi Electric Power As*367sociation. The trial testimony was in direct con
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011-03-31 · Published · cited 4× · 360 S.W.3d 270; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 441
360 S.W.3d 270 (2011) In re the Marriage of: Jeneffer Keet BELL, Petitioner-Appellant/Respondent, v. Mark Robert BELL, Respondent-Respondent/Cross-Appellant. Nos. SD 30208, 30222. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. March 31, 2011. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied April 22, 2011. Application for Transfer Denied Ju