Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jo L. Gilbert”
Gilbert v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, BLACK, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Gilbert v. Statepublic domain
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following in its place. Appellant appeals his convictions of three counts of attempted voluntary manslaughter. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the detectives interrogated appellant a
Gilbert Dudley, III v. State of Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC11-2292 ____________ GILBERT DUDLEY, III, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [May 15, 2014] PER CURIAM. Thi
Gilbert v. Cosco Inc.public domain
BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Mr. Gregory Gilbert and Mrs. Tamara Gilbert, the Appellants, brought a products liability action against Cosco Inc. claiming that defects in the child restraint device manufactured by Cosco Inc. caused the death of their infant child, Deric Gilbert. Mr. and Mrs. Gilbert appeal the jury verdict alleging the district court erred in certain evidentiary decisions and erred in instructing the jury. We disagre
People v. Jopublic domain
RENNER, J. *1134Following a jury trial, defendant Nan Hui Jo was convicted of child custody deprivation ( Pen. Code, § 278.5, subd. (a) ) and sentenced to 175 days in county jail and thirty-six months probation.1 On appeal, defendant contends: (1) the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the union of act
Gilbert v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 1615, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 (2015) (recognizing that an officer’s mission during a traffic stop typically involves ordinary inquiries incident to the traffic stop beyond determining whether to issue a traffic ticket, including: “checking the driver’s license, determining whether there are outstanding warrants against the driver, and inspec
People v. Jopublic domain
Filed 10/3/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ---- THE PEOPLE, C079280 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF143595) v. NAN HUI JO,
Troy Gilbert v. State of Floridapublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-3486 _____________________________ TROY GILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington, Judge. March 29, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., W
RALPH CARL GILBERT v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RALPH CARL GILBERT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
Estate of Gilbert v. Blackpublic domain
722 S.W.2d 548 (1987) ESTATE OF Jo Anne GILBERT, et al., Relators, v. Honorable William C. BLACK, Judge, Respondent. No. 3-86-058-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 7, 1987. R.D. Pattillo, III, Williams, Pattillo & Squires, Waco, for relators. Byron L. Falk, Vial, Hamilton, Koch & Knox, Dallas, for State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. and Larry
T -A ROHOW FoO-Alo -exTCM-^AOTO H>e^ C^aH ^TiTioN) OF t:>f^cte-TiotwA0^ t^VieiAj u(/e S'^'coa^o rouirroF ^PPe^LS ^OM THeam-^^o-
United States v. Juncalpublic domain
10-1800(L) USA v. Juncal 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 March Term, 2012 6 7 Argued: March 8, 2012 8 9 Decided: July 23, 2013 10 11 Docket Nos. 10-1800-cr(L), 10-2047-cr(CON), 10-3314-cr(CON) 12 13 _________________________________
^-Xq-ZoiS- -I A^SOSTa OF CCh^ Of muw^iX^- AP^i\\% X ^V)%\ 3es^\ -A Rotiow ^oO-Alo -ex.-TeMS\o-M c^M T^TiTioro OF t^\/iei^ u^jO€1^_ x\?pe^L UoSi OZ~n -00o4T--C£,^ DZ-^-OOOUS-CfL^ 0z-m-000^<^-a2- ^0^_~\^tooCiSB-t(L, & OZ-IH'-COOSj-C'e. -Auci kX3 •FAio'CTor W^Houoso X W3T
i acosTa ciciiic OF Tvte mjer cr cemiioA*- X ^>0%^ seioT A Hcmow FoiiAio CxrreMSioT^J Fbe. ^AH TferiTioN) OF Dz-feceerioA-itieM t€'\/ieMj u^JC)e^^- APPeis>L WoV. OZ-m -oooH> -Cc ^GX -^H-'OOOHB"C.iL^ Ot-\H-OOOs,OL-~ IHOOOSD-CR.; S: Oz-m-ooosi-t'e. Ajc> Ud -FAkjlTGr V)\Houoso X kjot "7?fe AcroAL c<5p^ of TTfr Jubc^e^t^e/ur cFT^/e S^co/
SandiCare, L.L.C. v. Wilsonpublic domain
CARR, Judge. {¶ 1} Appellant, SandiCare, LLC, appeals the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. This Court affirms. I. {¶ 2} This matter arises out of dispute between SandiCare, a home care provider, and its former employee, Wanda Wilson. As a condition of her employment with SandiCare, Ms. Wilson signed a non-complete agreement
Gilbert, Cheeckopublic domain
FebC'vL.c--r-y. 2C.,.~ JDIS Ch~o C,·,\b~ 'lbC"':r-C.l 0 N0 D An ~"" 8. Po t(A\1\~ ky Ui'lt+ 3R7:\A.4"~ of C,r,·~~,~( t4(Jf-eJ S of Te"t'-~S P. 0, Oo) 7~7/( Oew M~.
James L. Davidson v. Jeremy Howard Johnsonpublic domain
10/25/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 5, 2024 Session JAMES L. DAVISON ET AL. v. JEREMY HOWARD JOHNSON ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 22CV-373 Bonita Jo Atwood, Judge ___________________________________
Chi Truc Hoang v. Trevor Gilbert and Jorja Gilbertpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00681-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/25/2015 8:38:06 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE
12/22/2015 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS NOTICE OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS 12/22/2015 3:33:00 PM
Power Road-Williams Field LLC v. Gilbertpublic domain
ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. Defendants Town of Gilbert, City of Mesa, and Maricopa County have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Doc. 7. The motion is fully briefed. The Court will grant Defendants’ motion in part and remand this case to Maricopa County Superior Court.1 I. Background.