Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joachim P Tape”
Tape v. Howard County 911 Caller 1public domain
FILED 4/24/2020 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Court for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF CO
Hogg v. Lynch, Chappell & Alsup, P.C.public domain
YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice In this attorney-versus-client fee dispute, Dhara Gayle Hogg challenges a summary judgment rendered in favor of her ex-lawyers on their claim against her for breach of contract. Hogg, who attempted to resist contract payment on unconscionability grounds, asks us to reverse the summary judgment, contending that the trial court erroneously prevented her from presenting evidence of her conversations with he
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge: This case raises the issue of whether a contract between the parties or section 32(l)(a) of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(l)(a) (“Lanham Act”), bars Nicholas Kassbaum (“Kassbaum”), a former member of the rock band “Step-penwolf,’-’ from referring to himself in promotional materials for a new band as “formerly of Steppenwolf,” an “ori
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
James v. PacifiCorppublic domain
764 Argued and submitted November 15, on appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed September 8, and respondents’ response filed September 15, 2022; recon- sideration allowed, previous order adhered to January 25, 2023 Jeanyne JAMES; Robin Colbert; Wendell Carpenter; Jane Drevo; Sam Drevo; Brooke Edge and Bill Edge, Sr.; Lori Fowler; Iris Hampton; James Holland; Rachelle McMa
Commonwealth v. Olavagepublic domain
OPINION BY McCAFFERY, J. ¶ 1 Appellant, Kirk Olavage, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas on one count of bringing contraband into a prison2 and one count of possessing contraband in a prison.3 Specifically, Appellant asks us to determine whether the trial court acted properly
Sawyer v. Wightpublic domain
196 F.Supp.2d 220 (2002) Robert SAWYER and Kelly Sawyer, Plaintiffs, v. Paul WIGHT a/k/a "The Giant" and a/k/a "Big Show", Marriott International, Incorporated, d/b/a Long Island Marriott Hotel and Conference Center and World Championship Wrestling, Incorporated a/k/a "WCW", Defendants. No. 00-CV-6502TCPMLO. United States District Court, E.D. New York. February 21, 2002.
Norma Heredia v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLCpublic domain
NUMBER 13-16-00129-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NORMA HEREDIA, Appellant, v. WAL MART STORES, TEXAS, LLC, Appellee. On appeal from the 275th District Court
People v. Kluhsmanpublic domain
[1] This case comes before us on interlocutory appeal from a trial court order suppressing evidence in a prosecution for possession of *Page 532 explosive or incendiary devices. We conclude that in seizing evidence of bomb-making from the defendant's house, the police acted in conformity with the exigent circumstances and plain view exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's suppression orde
Tran v. Board of Chiropractic Examinerspublic domain
DUNCAN, P. J. The State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (board) found that petitioner had committed more than 800 violations of the provisions of ORS chapter 684, which governs the practice of chiropractic, and imposed a civil penalty of $201,250. Petitioner seeks judicial review of the board’s order, arguing that the board lacks the power to discipline him because he never applied for or received a license to practice chiropr
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00619-CV Argonaut Insurance Company and Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company, Appellants v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY,
Opinion issued May 18, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00949-CV ——————————— MICHAEL HENDERSON, Appellant V. CC-PARQUE VIEW, LLC D/B/A PARQUE VIEW APARTMENTS, ASSET
Opinion issued January 23, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00326-CV ——————————— EVA CASAS, Appellant V. CASTANO ENTERPRISES, LLC D/B/A CUBE INVESTME
in the Interest of S.D. and A.-M.S.D., Childrenpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-10-00221-CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.D. AND A.-M.S.D., CHILDREN ---------- FROM 233RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------- In eleven iss
Howard Okon v. Roy Boldonpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-14-00334-CV HOWARD OKON APPELLANT V. ROY BOLDON APPELLEE ---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
Bernal v. Lindholmpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 165 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 166 OPINION This is an appeal from the judgment of the L
in the Interest of S.D. and A.-M.S.D., Childrenpublic domain
02-10-221-CV
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00304-CV ___________________________ SCOTT’S BIG TRUCK SALES, LLC; DON’S BIG TRUCK SALES, LLC; DONALD R. SCOTT; AND JOHNNY A. SCOTT, Appellants V. AUTOMOTIVE FINANCE CORPORATION, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 96t
OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. Raymundo Rico, Jr. appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of L~3 Communications Corporation (L — 3) and Megan Ridge. In six issues, Rico asserts the trial court erred by granting summary judgment on Rico’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and for malici
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS