Cases

PER CURIAM: Everett is a patent agent. He has some papers belonging to Von Brimer, who employed him. Von Brimer asserts he needs the papers to use in connection with a patent interference proceeding in the United States Patent Office. Thus, he asked for a subpoena duces tecum under Rule 45, F.R.Civ.P. The

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. ' In this legal malpractice suit, plaintiff William B. Tanner appeals the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, the law firm of Caplin & Drys-dale and three of its attorneys. 1 On appeal, plaintiff argues that the District Court erred in ruling that plaintif

Everett Frye, defendant, was arrested by certain deputies sheriff in his home, and was subsequently informed against for the crime of gaming with a roulette wheel, a misdemeanor. At the time of the entry into defendant's home and his arrest, the deputies were acting under and by authority of a search warrant which had theretofore been issued and which was subsequently, but prior to defendant's trial, quashed by the court. Defendant, upon his arraignment, entered a plea of not guilty, a

DECISION LEWIS, Judge: In United States v. Bolser, 22 M.J. 564 (A.F.C.M.R.1986) and United States v. Dale, 23 M.J. 598 (A.F.C.M.R.1986), issue certified, 23 M.J. 243 (1986), we held that a court-martial lacks subject matter jurisdiction over sexual offenses committed off a military installation by a service member against one of his own dependents. In the case at hand we must deter

DECISION HOLTE, Judge: The appellant was tried and convicted by general court-martial consisting of members. Contrary to his pleas he was found guilty of three specifications of committing indecent acts with a female under the age of 16 years of age, not his wife. He was sentenced to a dismissal and a forfeiture of $1000.00 per month for three months. The convening authority approved the dismissal and a forf

732 S.W.2d 938 (1987) Mary JINES and Joe Jines, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. William C. YOUNG, M.D., Defendant-Appellant. No. 14618. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. July 1, 1987. *940 Manuel Drumm, Drumm & Winchester, Sikeston, for defendant-appellant. C.H. Parsons, Jr., Dennis P. Wilson, Pars

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1245 USA GYMNASTICS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1245 USA GYMNASTICS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the S

39 P.3d 1076 (2002) 2002 WY 23 LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Appellant (Respondent), v. Lawrence L. COOK and Christy Cook, Appellees (Petitioners). No. 00-339. Supreme Court of Wyoming. February 8, 2002. *1079 Representing Appellant: Scott A. Sargent, Lincoln County Attorney; John D. Bowers, Deput

99 Ariz. 60 (1965) 406 P.2d 729 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Joe Ernest BLANKENSHIP and William Lee Blankenship, Appellants. No. 1469. Supreme Court of Arizona. En Banc. October 14, 1965. *62 Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., Robert W. Pickrell, Former Atty. Gen., Norman E. Green, Pima County Atty., Carl Waa

MEMORANDUM BROOKS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on several motions to strike evidentiary materials and numerous motions for summary judgment. Statement of Relevant Facts Charles Harris was employed at the Aluminum Company of America (“ALCOA”) Warrick operations near Newburgh, Indiana, from September 1970 through Febru

OPINION LYDON, Senior Judge: On February 18, 1998, CRC Marine Services, Inc., a Rhode Island corporation, filed its “Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief’ protesting the allegedly unlawful rejection of its lowest-priced bids under U.S. Department of the Army, Military Traffic Management Command (MTMC) Solicitation Nos. NIW-97-002-CB, 1NXX-980012-Z, and 1NXX-00948-N. Plaintiff also serve

This case is before us on appellee's motion for a rehearing. A decree annulling the marriage entered into by Maude Lee Mudd Gordon and Earl Gordon on June 8th, 1925, at Council Bluffs, Iowa, was obtained by the former in the superior court of Pinal county, this state, on May 5th, 1926, and within a year thereafter, to wit, on May 2d 1927, the latter filed in that court his complaint praying that this decree be vacated and set aside and that he be permitted to answer and defend the action. The

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM