Cases

BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: John S. Bennett appeals from the district court's award of summary judgment in favor of his former employer, Virtus Consulting, LLC (Virtus), and its owner, James Garner (collectively, the defendants), in Bennett's action seeking to collect on a state court judgment entered against the defendants. The district court held that Bennett's claims were p

ACCEPTED 05-18-00052-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 3/26/2018 6:09 PM LISA MATZ

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ___________________ NO. 09-16-00437-CV ___________________ TEXAS ALLIANCE OF ENERGY PRODUCERS – WORKERS’ COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED GROUP TRUST, Appellant V. JOHN BENNETT,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,018-01 IN RE JOHN BRANDON BENNETT, Relator ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. W03-58932-P(A) IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to fi

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,018-01 IN RE JOHN BRANDON BENNETT, Relator ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. W03-58932-P(A) IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a

OPINION OF THE COURT On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. As the issue of the timeliness under CPLR 3212 (a) *1034of defendants’ summary judgment motion was not preserved in Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals lacks power to r

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered January 28, 2014. The order and judgment granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from is affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, individually and as the administrator of the estate of his wife, Virgin

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered January 28, 2014. The order and judgment granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from is affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, individually and as the administrator of the estate of his wife, Virgin

Motion for reargument denied. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Peradotto, J.P., Carni, Sconiers, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Motion for reargument denied. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Peradotto, J.P., Carni, Sconiers, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered November 22, 2013. The order granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPL

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (William P. Polito, J.), entered November 22, 2013. The order granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that said appeal is dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPL

Matter of Jamee Bennett G. v John Nicolaas B. (2021 NY Slip Op 06757) Matter of Jamee Bennett G. v John Nicolaas B. 2021 NY Slip Op 06757 Decided on December 02, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by Ne

Matter of Jamee Bennett G. v John Nicolaas B. (2021 NY Slip Op 06757) Matter of Jamee Bennett G. v John Nicolaas B. 2021 NY Slip Op 06757 Decided on December 02, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by Ne

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 211 SSM 17 Ainsworth M. Bennett, &c., Appellant, v. St. John's Home et al., Respondents. Submitted by David E. Woodin, for appellant. Submitted by David H. Fitch, for respondents. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of su

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 200.1 CA 14-01354 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. AINSWORTH M. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA R. BENNETT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER ST. JOHN’S HOME AND ST. JOHN’S HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) DAVID E. WOODIN, LL

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00437-CR JOHN MURRAY APPELLANT BENNETT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ------------ FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 200.2 CA 14-01356 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. AINSWORTH M. BENNETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA R. BENNETT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ST. JOHN’S HOME AND ST. JOHN’S HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.) DAVID E. WOODIN, LLC, CATS

02-09-437-CR COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN MCCOMISH; NANCY MCLAIN;  TONY BOUIE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ROBERT BURNS, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, ARIZONA FREE ENTERPRISE CLUB’S FREEDOM CLUB PAC; ARIZONA TAXPAYERS ACTION COMMITTEE, agent of Taxpayers Action Committee; DEAN MARTIN; RICK MURPHY, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, No. 10-15165