Cases

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-20-00250-CV __________________ AMY SHOULDICE, Appellant v. CHRISTINE VAN HAMERSVELD AND JOHN D. THOMPSON JR., Appellees ____________________________________________________

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-18-00355-CV __________________ AMY ANNE SHOULDICE, Appellant V. CHRISTINE ELIZABETH VAN HAMERSVELD AND JOHN D. THOMPSON JR., Appellees

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-18-00355-CV _________________ AMY ANNE SHOULDICE, Appellant V. CHRISTINE ELIZABETH VAN HAMERSVELD AND JOHN D. THOMPSON JR., Appellees __________________

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-18-00355-CV _________________ AMY ANNE SHOULDICE, Appellant V. CHRISTINE ELIZABETH VAN HAMERSVELD AND JOHN D. THOMPSON JR., Appellees

PER CURIAM hln 2014, appellant John D. Thompson was found guilty by a jury of first-degree murder of his wife. He was sentenced to 480 months’ imprisonment, and the Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed. Thompson v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 486, 469 S.W.3d 814. In 2015, Thompson timely filed in the trial court a verified pro se

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00369-CV ___________________________ KAREN MOLINA THOMPSON, Appellant V. JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY AND DEERE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. D/B/A JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL, Appellees On Appeal

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00369-CV ___________________________ KAREN MOLINA THOMPSON, Appellant V. JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY AND DEERE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. D/B/A JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL, Appellees On Appeal

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge [ j Appellant John Thompson was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder committed against his wife, and he was sentenced to forty years in prison. Mr. Thompson’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial after the State elicited testimony during trial that had been prohibited by the

ACCEPTED 08-24-00363-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 08-24-00363-CV

OPINION PATRICIA 0. ALVAREZ, Justice. Appellant Chad Thompson is a fire fighter for the City of Waco. He was promoted to fire station lieutenant, but a few months later was demoted to his previous rank of fire equipment engineer. After his request to be reinstated as a fire station lieutenant was denied, Thompson sued the City of Waco and Fire Chief John D

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-13-00460-CV Chad THOMPSON, Appellant v. CITY OF WACO, Texas and Fire Chief John D. Johnston, Appellees From the 414th Judicial

City of Waco, Texas and Fire Chief John D. Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 19, 2014 No. 04-13-00460-CV Chad THOMPSON, Appellant

Jfourtl) Court of S , (Eexas October 3. 2013 No. 04-13-00460-CV Chad Thompson, Appellant v. City of Waco, Texas and Fire Chief John D. Johnston.

Opinion FLYNN, C. J. The defendant, John D. Thompson, appeals from the judgments of conviction, following a jury trial, of two counts of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a) and two counts of possession of narcotics within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (d).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that his conv

*570 PER CURIAM Where a statutory term is undefined, that term is imbued -with the plain meaning as commonly understood at the time of enactment. This appeal involves a provision of the Texas Occupations Code concerning licensing restrictions where an applicant has previously been convicted of a crime. ,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 9, 2013 Session MELISSA L. BLACKSHEAR (THOMPSON) v. STEPHEN D. BLACKSHEAR Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 03D1987 W. Neil Thomas, III, Judge No. E2012-02499-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 19, 2014 This appeal arises from the parties’ post-divorce issues. The

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 98 Conn. App. 245 (AC 25982), is denied. *947Decided December 6, 2006 Darcy McGraw, special public defender, in support of the petition. Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state’s attorney, in oppos

Per Curiam: This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against the respondent, Pamela J. Thompson, of Wichita, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 1985. On October 3, 2018, the office of the Disciplinary Administrator filed a formal complaint against the respondent alleging violations of t

Timothy C. Batten, Sr., United States District Judge This case comes before the Court on Defendants John Does' motion [33] to dismiss for failure to state a claim and first motion [41] for sanctions. Also before the Court is Plaintiff Dar Thompson's motion [47] to strike Defendants' reply brief [46] in support of their motion for sanctions. I. Background1

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Appellant on the 7th of February 2017 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017."