Cases

03/23/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 7, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN HUDSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 09-04562 Chris Craft, Judge ______________

*657 OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, twelve graduates of the Thomas M. Cooley Law School, sued their alma mater in district court, alleging that the school disseminated false employment statistics which misled them into deciding to attend Cooley. The gr

Opinion filed August 7, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00181-CV __________ KENNETH DAVID HUDSON, JR. AND TASHA N. HUDSON, Appellants V. MORRIS BANDA, Appellee On Appeal from the 259th District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EUGENE HUDSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2738 (JEB) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Another day, another Motion in the interminable litigation between Plaintiff Eugene Hudson and Defendant American Federation

OPINION STRAS, Justice. This case requires us to determine whether the therapist-client privilege, which pi-ohibits therapists from disclosing information or opinions in court that they acquired from their clients in a professional capacity, contains an exception for threatening statements. The district court concluded that the privilege' does not apply

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED June 13, 2023 State of West Virginia, EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK Plaintiff Below, Respondent SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Reversed and remanded for resentencing and resentencing by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge KING joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge. After pleading guilty to drug trafficking, John Hudson was released on bond pending sentencing. Because of fear over the length of h

Riley, Judge. *223 STATEMENT OF THE CASE [1] Appellant-Defendant, Joseph C. Hudson (Hudson), appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence. [2] We affirm. ISSUES </

|.WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND MADE PEREMPTORY; WRIT DENIED IN PART. |2We find that the trial court erred in ordering the plaintiff to undergo a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) by Samuel Forester, a physical therapist. A physical therapist is not one of the professionals permitted to conduct examinations pursuant to La.Code Civ.P. art. 1464. See Williams v. Smith, 576 So.2d 448 (La.1991)(limiting examinations to t

998 A.2d 1272 (2010) 122 Conn.App. 804 STATE of Connecticut v. Curtis B. HUDSON. No. 30483. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 21, 2010. Decided July 27, 2010. *1274 Annacarina Jacob, senior assistant public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Sarah Hanna, assistant sta

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, John Hancock Life Insurance Company, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Mary Jo Hudson, the Ohio Superintendent of Insurance, in her capacity as liquidator for Credit General Insurance Company and Credit General Indemnity Company (hereinafter collectively "Credit General").

ORDER GRANTING UNITED CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND CANCEL-LINGHEARING THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. In December 2012, a fire destroyed the house Plaintiffs were renting. Plaintiffs’ personal property was insured by two separate insurance policies: one with State Farm, the other with United Casualty Insurance. After investigating Plaintiffs’ claim for loss of persona

577 F.3d 883 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephan L. HUDSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-3240. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 15, 2009. Filed: August 20, 2009. *884 Stephen C. Moss, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, argued (Raymond C. Conrad,

HUDSON, J., recused.

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FURTHER RELIEF ' LEN H. DAVIDSON, Senior District Judge. Presently before the Court are a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or alternatively for new trial [168] filed by Defendant Hudson Specialty Insurance Company, as well as a mot

04/08/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 3, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN DAVID HUDSON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 18-235 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

KATHY A. SURRATT-STATES, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, Answer to Second Amended Complaint of Plaintiff *488Phillips 66 Company, Defendant's Trial Brief, Phillips 66 Company's Trial Brief, Joint Statement of Stipulated Facts, and Phillips 66 Company's Post-Trial Brief o

878 F.Supp. 240 (1995) FAWN MINING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Marty D. HUDSON, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-2256 (JR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 24, 1995. William Henry Howe, Richard Alan Steyer, Mary Lou Smith, Howe, Anderson & Steyer, Washington, DC, for Fawn Min. Corp. Paul A. Green, John R. Mooney, Beins, Axelr

*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, the Full Commission finds no good grounds to receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives. Upon reconsideration of the evidence, the Full Commission affirms, with modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opi

SETH, Circuit Judge. Appellants John Hudson, Larry Baresel and Jack Rackley were indicted in August 1992 for criminal law violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 656 and 1005 because of their alleged mismanagement and illegal operation of several banks. These violations were based on the same lending transactions which were the subject of prior administrative sanctions imposed against