Cases

Appeal dismissed by published opinion. Judge King wrote the opinion, in which Judge Thacker and Judge Gibney concurred. KING, Circuit Judge: In these proceedings, plaintiff Wayne Oliver filed a complaint in Maryland state court alleging asbestos exposure claims against, among other defendants, Campbell-McCormick, Inc. (“CMC”). In response, CMC filed a third-

JOHN B. ROBBINS, Judge, dissenting. I would deny appellant’s J petition for rehearing because McCormick failed to stricdy comply with Rule 24.3(b), and thus we did not err when we dismissed his appeal after the case was initially submitted. In our unpublished opinion dismissing his appeal we held that there was noncompliance with Rule 24.3(b) because “the record does not reveal that the prosecutor made any

417 B.R. 362 (2009) In the Matter of John Gregory McCORMICK, et al., Debtors. John A. Northern, Trustee in Bankruptcy for John Gregory McCormick, et al., Plaintiff, v. SunTrust Bank, N.A., Marc Macky, and Maryann Macky, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-80976C-7D. Adversary No. 08-09028. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina, Durham Division. August 6, 2009.

MEMORANDUM ** Thomas McCormick, as Trustee on behalf of the Unity Family Trust, F.C. *471Sands, and C. Sands (collectively, “Sands”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of a suit for lack of standing and subject matter jurisdiction. Sands alleges that the defendant-appellees, William Hablinski (“Hablinski”) and Amir Construction Company, et al. (

12/09/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 16, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSEPH JOHN TURCHIN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Monroe County No. 17-380 Andrew M. Freiberg, Judge ___________________________________

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge WYNN joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: In this bankruptcy case, in which John McCormick is the debtor, SunTrust Bank, N.A., filed a proof of claim for repayment of a loan that it claimed was secured by a deed of trust on two contig

635 A.2d 347 (1993) Xavier McCORMICK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 92-SP-1329. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 16, 1993. Decided December 27, 1993. Joseph C. Metcalfe, with whom Mary C. Kennedy and John M. Copacino, Georgetown University Law Center Criminal Justice Clinic, were on the briefs, for appellant. <

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges O’Brien, Russell and Retired Judge Bumgardner* Argued at Norfolk, Virginia PUBLISHED JOSEPH JOHN MELICK OPINION BY v. Record No. 1564-17-1 JUDGE WESLEY G. RUSSELL, JR.

05/24/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 31, 2022 Session LAWRENCE SIMONETTI ET AL. v. THOMAS FRANK MCCORMICK ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 19C1362, 19C1686 Joseph P. Binkley, Jr., Judge ____

503 S.E.2d 502 (1998) 202 W.Va. 189 Robert W. McCORMICK, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alicia A. McCormick, Plaintiff below, Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Division of Corrections, Joseph Skaff, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Department of Public Safety, Ron Gregory, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Past Commissioner of the West Virginia Div

ARTHUR, J. This case principally concerns the extent to which federal law expressly or impliedly preempts state common-law and statutory claims for personal injuries that resulted from the so-called “off-label” promotion of a medical device. Relying on one of the first of what are now numerous federal district

458 F.Supp. 776 (1978) Delores J. McCORMICK and John McCormick, her husband, Plaintiffs, v. Wendell C. COOLEY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 77-1359. United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. October 16, 1978. *777 Joseph M. George, Buck, Margolis, Mahoney & George, Uniontown, Pa., Michael J. Seymour, Feczko & Seymour, M

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to overrule Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109; 683 NW2d 611 (2004). The no-fault automobile insurance act, in MCL 500.3135(1), provides that “[a] person remains subject to tort liability for noneconomic loss caused by his or her ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle only if the injured pe

FILED May 12, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

479 F.Supp. 295 (1979) R. C. McCORMICK v. Edwin EDWARDS, Individually and as Governor of Louisiana, and Wingate M. White, Individually and as Executive Director of the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement & Administration of Criminal Justice. Civ. A. No. 76-272-A. United States District Court, M. D. Louisiana. September 26, 1979.

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00682-CV IN RE ALAMO HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, Alamo Heights Neighborhood Committee, and John Joseph Original Mandamus Proceedings 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 28,

PONDER, Judge ad hoc. For the reasons assigned by us in the consolidated case of Condon, et al. v. McCormick, et al., La.App, 134 So.2d 619, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff. Affirmed. On Application for Rehearing. En Banc. Rehearing denied. TATE and FRUGE, recused.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOHN H. KLEIN and CAMBRIDGE ) THERAPEUTIC TECHNOLOGIES, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0643-KSJM ) MARC WASSERMAN, ROBERT ) BRES

96 F.3d 1533 65 USLW 2234, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1905,Pens. Plan Guide P 23926T Herbert L. FISCHER; Floyd L. Adams; James W. Alfreds;John I. Arena; Earl T. Atkinson; William Auve; Thomas F.Beck; William J. Bono; William A. Burwell, Jr., Joseph C.Calabrese; Peter Carfagno; John B. Creighton; Ralph J.Dafermo, Sr.; Felix A. DeJoseph; Joseph A. Devito; JohnT. Dougherty; John J. Dowl

180 Ill. App.3d 184 (1988) 536 N.E.2d 419 BROOKS McCORMICK, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROOKS McCORMICK et al., as Trustees, et al., Defendants-Appellees. — CHARLES E. SCHROEDER et al., as Trustees, Petitioners-Appellees, v. BROOKS McCORMICK, JR., Indiv., et al., Respondents-Appellants. No. 1-87-2701. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division).