Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 18–2201 Filed June 30, 2020 DARREN PETRO, Appellant, vs. PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mary E. Howes (motion to dismiss) and Stuart P. Werling (summary judgment), Judges. An individual appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action against an educational institution he formerly attend

2009 ND 124 Virginia Bice, Helen A. and Hillis J. Bice, Helen A. Bice Life Estate, Naomi Brew, Patricia Burian Ingman, Myran S. and Mary C. Burian, Estate of Steve Burian, Arnold and Sharon Burian, Connie F. Burian Heck, Jane Elizabeth Kiker, Elmer L. Glovatsky, Timothy Glovatsky, Shirley and Lawrence W. Jablonsky, Leo and Selina Kaiser, Russell L. Kiker, Russell L. Kiker Trust, Sally A. Kiker Trust, Ardyce Burian Palaniuk, Irene E. Scott Mineral Trust,

ACCEPTED 06-15-00044-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/20/2015 7:43:29 PM

ACCEPTED 13-15-00342-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/5/2015 6:01:20 PM

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-11-00403-CV ________________________ CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC., NOMAC DRILLING CORPORATION, ROBERT RUSSELL/ROBERT M. CONSULTING, LLC, APPELLANTS V. KE

131 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1096 63 P.3d 913 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of San Bernardino County, Respondent; Roslyn Carrillo et al., Real Parties in Interest. Baumac Corporation, Petitioner, v. The Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Respondent; Roslyn Carrillo, Real Party in Interest. Petro-Tex Chemical Corporation et

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 341 {¶ 1} These two timely appeals have been consolidated for the purposes of appellate review as they present similar facts and issues. Appellants John Dombelek ("Dombelek") and Les Tate ("Tate") each filed claims for workers' compensation benefits. They are now appealing two judgment entries of

ACCEPTED 05-18-00647-CV 05-18-00647-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS

25 A.3d 482 (2011) In re Review of PROPOSED TOWN OF NEW SHOREHAM PROJECT. No. 2010-273-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 1, 2011. *485 Michael R. McElroy, Esq., Providence, for Petitioners, Toray Plastics (America), Inc. and Polytop Corporation. Gerald J. Petros, Esq., Providence, for Respondents, The Narragansett Electric

OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice In this permissive appeal we are asked to construe a 1927 mineral deed. The 1927 deed is only seven paragraphs long, and no party claims it is ambiguous. But, the parties have widely different interpretations concerning what interests the deed conveyed and the size of those interests. The Appellants are the successors in

522 F.3d 874 (2008) COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norm MALENG, Defendant, Washington Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Defendant-Intervenor, and Roger Hoen; Vera Ing; Merritt D. Long, in their official capacities as members of the Washington State Liquor Control Board, Defendants-Appellants. Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No

O’Donnell, J., dissenting. {¶ 105} In my view, this court has prematurely accepted review over a very limited but important constitutional issue regarding the establishment and operation of community schools statewide, and the majority has considered it on a scant record. Even a cursory reading of the majority and dissenting opinions reveals the complexity of the issue and the divergent positions taken by the me

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTORS’ CLAIM OF EXEMPTIONS1 JASON D. WOODARD, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court for hearing on June 10, 2014, on the Objection to the Debtors’ Claim of Exemptions (the Objection ’) (Dkt. # 15) filed by Selene D. Maddox, the chapter 7 trustee in this case (the “Trustee”). At the

OPINION BILL BASS, Justice. In this trade secret case, Southwestern Energy Production Company (Sepco) appeals a judgment for almost $40 million, including attorney’s fees, rendered in favor of Toby Berry-Helfand and Gery Muncey after a jury trial. Sepco raises five issues on appeal. We reverse and render in part, affirm in part, and remand t

ACCEPTED 03-13-00790-CV 4062436 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

443 F.Supp.2d 97 (2006) MYSTIC LANDING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PHARMACIA CORPORATION, Defendant. Pharmacia Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Modern Continental Construction Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-10180-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 5, 2006. *98

MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, John E. Barnes, Jr. ("Barnes"), appeals from the Cleveland Municipal Court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, the city of Cleveland ("the city"). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand. {¶ 2} In October 2005, Barnes registered the trade n

Bryant, J., dissenting. {¶ 29} Being unable to agree with the majority opinion, I respectfully dissent. The majority holds in the syllabus that “[cjonsistent with long-standing Ohio jurisprudence in following federal law regarding antitrust cases, an indirect purchaser of goods may not file a Valentine Act claim for violations of Ohio antitrust law. (Illinois Brick v. Illinois (1977), 431 U.S. 720, 97

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE ABRAMSON Two sets of Harlan County landowners, the Bakers1 and certain heirs (together with their spouses) of Chester Jackson (the “Jackson heirs”)2 jointly brought suit in Harlan Circuit Court seeking, among other things, damages'and a declaration of their rights under oil and gas leases executed in 2004 with Daugherty

504 S.E.2d 802 (1998) Anna Mae SHERRILL, Annetta C. White, Linda S. Mintz, Vernette Price, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION a/k/a Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Amoco Oil Company; BP Exploration & Oil Inc.; Citgo Petroleum Corporation; Colonial Pipe Line Company; Conoco, Inc. a/k/a Southern Facilities; Crown Central Petroleum Corporation; Exxon Corporation; Marathon Oil Compa