Cases

607 N.W.2d 453 (2000) LYON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a The Manifest Group, with its principal offices in Marshall, Minnesota, Respondent, v. Maren WADDILL, Appellant, Lyman Waddill, Defendant. No. C8-99-1409. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. March 14, 2000. *454 Kevin K. Stroup, Christianson, Stoneberg, Giles & Stroup,

421 So.2d 1144 (1982) Sam GARNER and Gretchen Garner, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Alice Bowes WADDILL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 15001. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 25, 1982. *1145 Sedric E. Banks, Monroe, for plaintiffs-appellants. Pipes & Pipes by Richard H. Pipes, Monroe, J. Carl Parke

WADDILL, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case involves a collision between the steamship Lake Lida and the barge Maine, while in tow of the steam tug Peerless, which occurred about 4 o’clock p. m. on the 13th day of March, 1920, in the waters of Elizabeth River, off Lambert’s Point, Norfolk, Vá. The facts are briefly these: The Lake Lida was a United States Shipping Board vessel, under charter to the United

WADDILL, Commissioner. Thomas Harold Brown appeals from a judgment sentencing him to two years in prison. He was convicted of possessing burglarious tools with the intention of using them burglariously, being the offense denounced by KRS 433.120(2). The sole ground urged for reversal of the conviction is that the evidence is insufficient to show that he was in possession of burglarious tools within the meaning of the above sub

WADDILL, Commissioner. Karen Lynn Peach, a child about six years old, was struck and killed by an automobile driven by Arthur Miller. Suit was filed seeking damages for the infant’s death on the theory that Miller’s negligence caused the accident. This appeal is from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of Miller. For reversal, it is urged that the court erred: (1) In instructing the jury; and, (2) in commenting

WADDILL, Commissioner. This action for wrongful death was brought by appellant, John A. Gregory, Jr., as ancillary administrator of the estate of Robert E. Hall, Sr., against appellee, Padu-cah Midstream Service, Inc., as lessee and operator of the tugboat Alice. The appel-lee moved for a directed verdict at the close of appellant’s evidence on the grounds that (1) no negligence in the operation of the tug was shown, and (2) the

WADDILL, District Judge. This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a decree of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, rendered on the 24th day of June, 1910. A brief summary only of the facts will be stated, relying upon the opinion of the learned judge of the lower court (180 Fed. 796) for a full statement and elaboration of the same. Kunigunda Miller, the wife of Andrew Miller, one of

WADDILL, Commissioner. Robert Hunt was arrested upon two warrants accusing him of violating a Lexington City Ordinance by indecently exposing himself in public. He was convicted upon his trial in the City Police Court and was again found guilty by a circuit court jury on his appeal to that court. He seeks reversal of the judgment fixing his punishment at 45 days in jail on each offense, to be served concurrently.

WADDILL, Commissioner. Appellant, who is the president of a drug company which sells prescription pharmaceuticals to wholesale firms, was convicted of performing an abortion, an offense denounced by KRS 436.020, and his punishment fixed at two years’ imprisonment. He appeals, asserting several grounds for reversal of his conviction. The first ground of error relates to the rebuttal testimony of Paul Hanna

Whitfield, C. J., delivered the opinion of the court, first appeal. In 1856 W. T. Barnard, then a widower and a large landowner in Issaquena county, married Mrs. Eudora Likens, a widow without children. No children were born to them. Mrs. Likens brought to her husband about $23,000 in money and property. The war having ruined his fortune, and suits being threatened, W. T. Barnard executed to R. S. Buck, as truste

WADDILL, Commissioner. Appellee, Mildred West, as administra-trix, recovered a verdict and judgment of $125,708 for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, Carl West, due to the negligence of a crane operator employed by appellant, Fisher Equipment Company. As grounds for reversal appellant urges that: (1) Appellee is barred from recovering damages for her husband’s death because he was contributorily negligent as a matte

SCHUMAN, J. Plaintiffs appeal from a trial court judgment declaring that defendants have an easement across their property and denying plaintiffs’ motion for a directed verdict to quiet their title as against defendants. We vacate the judgment and remand with instructions to enter a judgment quieting plaintiffs’ title as against defendants. Plaintiffs and defendants1 own property

WADDILL, Commissioner. The question presented for decision is whether legally “dry” county territory that is annexed to a legally “wet” city becomes “wet” territory following the annexation. The trial court was of the opinion that the annexed territory remained “dry” and, therefore, held that the Kentucky Alcoholic Beverage Control Board-acted in excess of its powers in issuing beer and drink licenses for appellant’s business

727 F.Supp.2d 997 (2010) ARCH CHEMICALS, INC., a Virginia corporation, and Lexington Insurance Co., Plaintiffs v. RADIATOR SPECIALTY COMPANY, a North Carolina corporation, Defendant. No. 07-1339-HU. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. July 28, 2010. *998 M. Robert Smith, Joseph Rohner IV, Dennis N. Freed,

LANDAU, J. In this original proceeding in mandamus, relator Davis Wright Tremaine LLP (“DWT”) challenges a trial court order compelling production of certain materials that, in DWT’s view, are protected under the attorney-client privilege codified at OEC 503. The trial court issued the order in the context of a legal malpractice action against DWT by a former client. The materials that are the subject of the order are communic

The opinion of the court was delivered by Smith, J.: This was an action to enjoin defendant from engaging in the paint and varnish business in Topeka for a period of five years from January 22, 1932. Judgment was for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The facts are substantially as follows: Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the wholesale distribution of paints and varnishes. Defendant was the pr

C. J. WADDILL, Special Commissioner. John H. Greene was killed in a collision between a truck and an automobile. Na-oma Allen Greene, the administratrix of his estate recovered judgment for $26,000.00 against Ellis Duncil and Larry Bentley. Prior to the trial, Duncil and Bentley requested that the administratrix furnish the names of witnesses who would testify. At the trial a witness whose name had not been revealed gave dam

WADDILL, Circuit Judge. The transactions involved in these two causes were so related to each other that they were by consent heard together in the District Court *559and disposed of in a single opinion by separate decrees. They were on appeal heard together by this court, and will be disposed of here also in a single opinion. The cases in the District Court were decided

WADDILL, Commissioner. Appellant was convicted of illegal possession of marihuana as denounced by KRS 218.020 and fined $200.00 and sentenced to serve two years in the state penitentiary pursuant to KRS 218.210. He contends that: (1) the trial court erred in failing to sustain his motion to quash the search warrant and to suppress the evidence found as a result of the search; (2) the Commonwealth’s evidence failed to establi

WADDILL, Circuit Judge. These are cross-appeals from a final decree of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, dated April 22, 1924, in the consolidated maritime causes brought against the American steamship Santa Rosa, and her cargo and freight money, for salvage services rendered to the vessel by five tugs, the Waban, the Cecelia, the Manomit, the Clincho, and the Hinton, all of Charleston,