⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John P. Foley”

Foley v. Kruegerpublic domain
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2015-02-14 · Published · cited 0× · 32 Mass. L. Rptr. 550
Curran, Dennis J., J. Thousands of fans flock to TD Garden to cheer on the Boston Bruins. It is no secret that the distribution and consumption of alcohol and the gathering of large groups of spirited fans can result in physical altercations.1 John P. Foley and Richard Krueger are two Bruins fans who got into a fight in a men’s restroom at TD Garden. Mr. Foley has sued Mr. Krueger f
Supreme Court of the United States · 1973-12-05 · Published · cited 7× · 38 L. Ed. 2d 422; 94 S. Ct. 405; 414 U.S. 212; 1973 U.S. LEXIS 183
Per Curiam. Blair & Co., Inc., was a member of the New York Stock Exchange, engaged in the general brokerage and commission business. In the early summer of 1970, as the result of operating losses and a shrinkage of capital, *213 Blair began a program of self-liquidation, which involved the tran
District Court, S.D. New York · 2012-03-20 · Published · cited 8× · 861 F. Supp. 2d 197; 2012 WL 933070; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37882
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. This securities class action against Transocean Ltd. (“Transocean”) and its current and former Chief Executive Officers (“CEOs”) follows in the wake of the tragic accident on the Deepwater Horizon on April 20, 2010. Lead Plaintiff Danica Pension A/S (“Lead Plaintiff’) brings the action on behalf of a putative class of investors who purchased or ot
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-01-03 · Published · cited 74× · 272 F.R.D. 126; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1541; 2011 WL 103960
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. This action is brought against Transocean Ltd. (“Transocean”) and its current and most recently former CEOs on behalf of a purported class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares in Transocean between August 5, 2009 and June 1, 2010, the class period. Three investors filed motions seeking to be appointed as lead plaintiff and for thei
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002-07-09 · Published · cited 3× · 437 Mass. 1016; 770 N.E.2d 989; 2002 Mass. LEXIS 423
*1017William P. Foley and John H. Aiigoni (plaintiffs) filed a document entitled “Citizens Suit Class Action Civil Rights Complaint” in the Superior Court, alleging that various State and local officials, mortgage lenders, and members of the bar had conspired to assess unlawful property taxes and confiscate private property. Most, but not all, of the defendants filed motions to dismiss the complai
McCabe v. Foleypublic domain
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006-03-06 · Published · cited 128× · 233 F.R.D. 683; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11399; 2006 WL 547988
ORDER MORRIS, United States Magistrate Judge. This case came before the Court on January 31, 2006 for a hearing1 Defendants’ Joint Motion for a Temporary Stay of Discovery and Protective Order (Doc. #29, Motion to Stay) and the opposition thereto (Doc. # 32). The Court had earlier permitted Nominal Defendant Fidelity National Financial, Inc., to file a reply memoran
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997-11-13 · Published · cited 124× · 127 F.3d 552
BAUER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff George Washington filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three detectives in their individual capacities and against the City of Chicago under the doctrine of respondeat superior. Among the eight counts in the complaint were allegations of unlawful arrest, excessive force, and federal and state claims for malicious prosecution. The detectives and the City moved to vacate or di
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988-10-14 · Published · cited 22× · 856 F.2d 660
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: The appellee, Gary Green, tries to portray the case as involving an ordinary commercial transaction in which a guarantor (appellant Maurice P. Foley) is simply trying to duck liability on a note. The attempted characterization is far from accurate. In fact, Green has been part of a scheme with two of Foley’s business partners (Alan Silverstein and Stephen
Foley v. Fletcherpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005-09-19 · Published · cited 46× · 836 N.E.2d 667; 361 Ill. App. 3d 39; 296 Ill. Dec. 916
836 N.E.2d 667 (2005) 361 Ill. App.3d 39 296 Ill.Dec. 916 Daniel J. FOLEY, Indiv., and Kathryn M. Foley, Indiv. and as Mother and Next Friend of Hannah Foley, a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Peggy FLETCHER and Primary Healthcare Associates, S.C., Defendants-Appellants (Ingalls Health Ventures, Defendant). No. 1-04-0506. Appellate Court of Illinois, Firs
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-10-08 · Published · cited 82× · 103 A.3d 60; 2014 Pa. Super. 226; 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3431; 2014 WL 5018462
OPINION BY WECHT, J.: D. Scot Haan and Patrice Amity Haan (“the Haans”) appeal the trial court’s October 11, 2013 order. In that order, the trial court denied the Haans’ motion for post-trial relief and entered final judgments on the matter. We affirm. In a memorandum opinion issued in support of the denial of the Haans’ post-trial m
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010-03-09 · Published · cited 63× · 598 F.3d 1; 2010 WL 816169
598 F.3d 1 (2010) Chief Charles D. FOLEY, Jr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TOWN OF RANDOLPH, Massachusetts; Richard W. Wells, Paul J. Connors, William Alexopoulos in their Official Capacities; Maureen C. Kenny and James Burgess in their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants, Appellees. No. 09-1558. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 2, 2009.
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-03-11 · Published · cited 4× · 601 F. Supp. 2d 379; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20334; 2009 WL 605849
601 F.Supp.2d 379 (2009) Charles D. FOLEY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF RANDOLPH, Richard W. Wells, in his official capacity, Paul J. Connors, in his official capacity, William Alexopoulos, in his official capacity, Maureen C. Kenny, in her individual and official capacities, James F. Burgess, Jr., in his individual and official capacities, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-12213-PBS. United States Distric
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006-06-14 · Published · cited 18× · 899 A.2d 1271; 2006 R.I. LEXIS 109; 2006 WL 1645642
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1273 OPINION Nearly a decade ago, the plaintiff, Virginia P. Foley, suffered a stroke that rendered her unable to live independently. Because she believed that numerous health-care providers gave her negligent care and were responsible for her condition, Ms. Foley brought this
Foley v. Arvidsonpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2000-12-28 · Published · cited 1× · 2000 MT 388; 304 Mont. 43; 16 P.3d 389; 57 State Rptr. 1650; 2000 Mont. LEXIS 381
JUSTICE LEAPHART delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶ 1 Appellant (Bill) brought an action to quiet title to ranch property in Ravalli County claiming that he had acquired title from his cotenants by adverse possession. After a trial to the bench, the District Court ordered judgment in favor of respondents. Bill
Caudill v. Foleypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999-10-28 · Published · cited 73× · 21 S.W.3d 203; 1999 Tenn. App. LEXIS 730
21 S.W.3d 203 (1999) Kimberly Lynn (Foley) CAUDILL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. William Howard FOLEY, Defendant/Appellee. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. October 28, 1999. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied April 17, 2000. *205 John D. Kitch, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff/Appellant. Edward P. Silva, Hartzo
Foley v. Foleypublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-01-27 · Published · cited 6× · 141 N.Y.S.3d 75; 190 A.D.3d 953; 2021 NY Slip Op 00421
Foley v Foley (2021 NY Slip Op 00421) Foley v Foley 2021 NY Slip Op 00421 Decided on January 27, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 204 B.R. 582; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 1740; 1996 WL 769073
204 B.R. 582 (1996) In re Eileen FOLEY aka Eileen Spaitz aka Eileen Herbert, Debtor. Eileen FOLEY, Plaintiff, v. ELSC, Sallie Mae, Wachovia SFS, Inc., and United Student Aid Funds, Inc., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 93-11477-8B7, Adv. No. 94-235. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. January 29, 1996. V. John Brook, Jr., St. Petersburg, FL.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002-12-10 · Published · cited 2× · 312 F.3d 517; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 502; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 25132; 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,330; 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 895; 2002 WL 31750151
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Dianne Foley appeals from a judgment following a jury verdict in favor of her former employer, defendant-appellee Commonwealth Electric Company (“the Company”), on her gender discrimination claims. She contends that she did not get a fair trial because the district court erroneously omitted jury instructions concerning vicarious l
J.P. v. T.H.public domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 170 So. 3d 681; 2014 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 246; 2014 WL 7008920
MOORE, Judge. J.P., the paternal grandmother of E.T.N. (“the child”), filed a petition for a writ of mandamus compelling the Baldwin Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) to vacate its order, entered on September 10, 2014, awarding T.H. (“the mother”) custody of the child and to enter an order placing custody of the child with her. We treat the petition as an appeal and affirm the order. Background
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-02-06 · Published · cited 7× · 811 S.E.2d 609; 257 N.C. App. 721
ELMORE, Judge. *722Richard B. Spoor (plaintiff), derivatively on behalf of JR International Holdings, LLC ("JR Holdings"), appeals from an order (1) dismissing under Rule 12(b)(6) his derivative claims against John Barth Sr. ("Sr.") and John Barth Jr. ("Jr.") (defendants) as barred by the statute of limitations and (2) denying his Rule 15(a) mo