⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John R. Pedersen”

State v. Pedersenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011-04-20 · Published · cited 14× · 255 P.3d 556; 242 Or. App. 305; 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 549
255 P.3d 556 (2011) 242 Or. App. 305 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kory Christian PEDERSEN, Defendant-Appellant. 071034900; A139544. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 26, 2010. Decided April 20, 2011. *557 Stephanie Hortsch, Deputy Public Defender, argued
Vowell v. Pedersenpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000-08-01 · Published · cited 26× · 734 N.E.2d 169; 315 Ill. App. 3d 665; 248 Ill. Dec. 461
734 N.E.2d 169 (2000) 315 Ill. App.3d 665 248 Ill.Dec. 461 Maxine VOWELL and Tony Vowell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Marshall E. PEDERSEN; Fox Valley Neurosurgery, Ltd.; Olsten Kimberly Quality Care; Advocate Health Care and Hospital Corporation, d/b/a Good Shepherd Hospital; Therapy Network Resources, P.C.; and Tamara Workman, Defendants-Appellees (Barth H. Goldberg, Contemnor-Appellant).
Idaho Supreme Court · 1999-07-13 · Published · cited 22× · 983 P.2d 208; 133 Idaho 135; 1999 Ida. LEXIS 77
983 P.2d 208 (1999) 133 Idaho 135 MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Respondent, v. John PEDERSEN and Jeff Pedersen, Defendants-Counterclaimants, and Wendy Pedersen and Kate Alexia Pedersen, a minor, by and through her mother and natural guardian, Wendy Pedersen, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants. No. 24524. Suprem
District Court, D. Maryland · 2015-10-27 · Published · cited 2× · 141 F. Supp. 3d 405; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146572; 2015 WL 6599183
MEMORANDUM James K. Bredar, United States District Judge Professor Peter L. Pedersen (“Plaintiff’) brought this action for correction of inven-torship under 35 U.S.C. § 256, naming as defendants Dr. Jean-Francois Geschwind, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (“JHUSOM”), and The Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Now pending before the Court are Defendants’
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975-11-12 · Published · cited 0× · 34 Ill. App. 3d 118; 339 N.E.2d 262; 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 3318
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DIERINGER delivered the opinion of the court: The plaintiff, Shirley R. Pedersen, filed this action in the Circuit Court of Cook County on November 13, 1973, pursuant to section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 110, § 72) to vacate the decree of divorce on the grounds that the property settlement incorporated in the decree of div
Pikk v. Pedersenpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-06-20 · Published · cited 22× · 826 F.3d 1222; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 11095; 2016 WL 3389776
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, shareholders of ZAGG Inc., a publicly held Nevada corporation, filed a shareholder-derivative action seeking damages, restitution, and other relief for ZAGG. They alleged that past and present officers and directors of ZAGG violated § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, breached their fiduciary duties to ZAGG, wasted corporate assets,
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987-11-05 · Published · cited 11× · 532 A.2d 183; 72 Md. App. 661; 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 401
72 Md. App. 661 (1987) 532 A.2d 183 THOMAS E. PEDERSEN, JR., ET UX. v. REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. No. 147, September Term, 1987. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 5, 1987. Francis John Gorman (Moore, Carney & Ryan and Joseph Pokorny, on the brief), Towson, for appellants. Victor I. Weiner (Leonard L. Lipschultz
Pippen v. Pedersenpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013-02-26 · Published · cited 3× · 2013 IL App (1st) 111371; 986 N.E.2d 697
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Pippen v. Pedersen & Houpt, 2013 IL App (1st) 111371 Appellate Court SCOTTIE PIPPEN and AIR PIP, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Caption PEDERSEN AND HOUPT; JAMES J. CLARKE II; and PEER PEDERSEN, Defendants-Appellees. District & No. First District, Second Division
District Court, D. Vermont · 2012-09-20 · Published · cited 1× · 897 F. Supp. 2d 210; 98 A.L.R. 6th 731; 2012 WL 4320674; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134646
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART COUNTER-CLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 46, 59) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. Presently pending before the court are two dispositive motions arising out of a February 20, 2010 snowmobile accident at or near the Mount Snow ski resort in West Dover,
People v. Pedersenpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1978-11-30 · Published · cited 10× · 86 Cal. App. 3d 987; 150 Cal. Rptr. 577; 1978 Cal. App. LEXIS 2146
86 Cal.App.3d 987 (1978) 150 Cal. Rptr. 577 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WAYNE LYNN PEDERSEN, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 9730. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. November 30, 1978. *989 COUNSEL John M. Polakovic for Defendant and Appellant. Eve
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
REVERSED AND REMANDED and Opinion Filed September 18, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00194-CV JOHN H. ROACH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SOLE TRUE TRUSTEE OF THE CREDIT SHELTER TRUST AND THE MARITAL TRUST, Appellant V. PATRICIA S. ROACH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PUTATIVE CO- EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD H. R
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014-07-22 · Published · cited 19× · 439 Md. 441; 96 A.3d 210; 2014 WL 3586537
ADKINS, J. In each of these three cases we are tasked with determining the appropriate method for crediting payments made under a workers’ compensation award when that award is increased on appeal. The question is whether the credits are computed on the basis of the number of weeks paid or the amount of money expended. The answer c
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 345 F.3d 593; 2003 WL 22288104
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 02-2014NE _____________ John Doe; Mary Doe, Individually and * as Husband and Wife, and; JNT, by * and through John Doe, his next friend; * Jay Brummett, Personal Representative * of the Estate of GayLynn Brummett, *
Arizona Supreme Court · 2012-12-05 · Published · cited 18× · 230 Ariz. 556; 288 P.3d 760; 2012 WL 6027763; 2012 Ariz. LEXIS 237
OPINION BERCH, Chief Justice. ¶ 1 On August 14, 2012, this Court issued an order affirming the superior court’s judgment that the submittal of two versions of an initiative, one of which was subsequently circulated for signatures, did not warrant excluding the initiative from the ballot. This opinion explains our order. I. FACTS
Larson v. Pedersenpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004-06-17 · Published · cited 3× · 349 Ill. App. 3d 203; 811 N.E.2d 1204
JUSTICE BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court: On July 25, 2002, plaintiff, Marvel Larson, refiled a previously nonsuited medical negligence complaint against defendants, Marshall N. Pedersen, M.D., and Fox Valley Neurology. On November 6, 2002, the circuit court of McHenry County entered an order dismissing plaintiffs c
State v. Pedersenpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004-05-18 · Published · cited 3× · 679 N.W.2d 368; 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 543; 2004 WL 1093320
SYLLABUS To establish that one has a sincerely held religious belief in the medicinal use of marijuana that is protected under the Freedom of Conscience Clause, article I , section 16 , of the Minnesota Constitution, the individual must articulate some connection between the use of marijuana and his or her communal religious practices or the principle tenets of his or her religion
State v. Pedersenpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2004-04-30 · Published · cited 0× · 325 Mont. 28
On May 21, 2002, the defendant was sentenced to a Five (5) year commitment to the Department of Corrections, with recommendation for placement in a pre-release center or the Intensive Supervision Program for the offense of violations of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony. On April 1,2004, the defendant's application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sen
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982-04-30 · Published · cited 0× · 677 F.2d 312; 110 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2361
OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. A discharged school district employee claims a denial of due process because he was not advised of his right to a hearing before the School Board. The district court found that the employee knew of this right and, therefore, could not recover damages simply because he lacked formal notice. We agree and also hold that a timely arbitration under the collective barga
Daly v. Pedersenpublic domain
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1967-12-21 · Published · cited 28× · 278 F. Supp. 88; 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7400
278 F.Supp. 88 (1967) Jerome DALY, Plaintiff, v. Paul R. PEDERSEN, Thomas Collins, City of Bloomington, and Donald J. Omodt, Hennepin County Sheriff, Defendants. No. 4-67 Civ. 168. United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. December 21, 1967. *89 Jerome Daly, pro se. John G. Pidgeon, Bloomington, Minn., fo
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2015-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-0061 Filed August 5, 2015 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF RUSSELL JAMES MERSMAN AND JUDYTH JOANNE MERSMAN Upon the Petition of RUSSELL JAMES MERSMAN, Petitioner-Appellee, And Concerning JUDYTH JOANNE MERSMAN, n/k/a JUDYTH JOANNE ALBRITTON, Respondent-Appellee, And Further Concerning JAROD J. PEDERSEN and HEATHER R. PEDERSEN, Appellants. _____________________________