Cases

MARTIN, Circuit Judge: Margaret Renfroe is a retired bank manager who claims that her mortgage payment incorrectly increased after Na-tionstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”) began servicing her loan. She wrote Na-tionstar to ask why her payment had gone up, but Nationstar gave no explanation. Instead, it said her account was correct and attached some loan documents. Mrs. Renfroe

PITTMAN, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Jennifer Guthrie is appealing from an order of the Rankin County Chancery Court denying her Petition for Modification of an Agreed Order of March 1, 1995. In her petition for modification, Guthrie sought custody of her child, Tim. His father, Timothy Renfroe, was awarded custody at the time of the divorce. However, Mattie and Fred Renfroe, Tim’s paternal grandparents, ha

Affirmatively denied permission to appeal from his five separate felony convictions pursuant to, and in compliance with, plea bargain agreements, appellant Luke Renfroe, Jr. has attempted to appeal from each conviction to complain of his trial counsel's ineffective assistance. Lacking authority to entertain the appeals on the nonjurisdictional, pre-plea matter, we will affirm. Separately charged with the offense of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, cocaine, on five

This case is remanded to circuit court on the motions of both appellant and appellee for the purpose of correcting the record and for further proceedings. REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. All the Judges concur.

PER CURIAM: Cheryl Anne Renfroe [Wade], a non-tenured teacher, was not rehired to teach with the Piedmont City Board of Education. She brought this 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 action contending she was not rehired because she filed a grievance, and that this violated her First Amendment rights. The jury awarded Renfroe $6,400 in compensatory damages and $12,500 in punitive damages. The d

626 P.2d 1068 (1980) John RENFROE, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Robert C. GREEN; Klaus Holzer; Kodiak Island Borough; Kodiak Island Borough School District, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. File Nos. 4394, 4481. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 28, 1980. *1069 John R. Strachan, Anchorage, for appellant and cross-appellee.

The employee, Winston Renfroe, filed a claim against his employer pursuant to the Alabama Workmen's Compensation Act. After an ore tenus proceeding the trial court found that on December 8, 1986, the employee was accidentally injured in the line and scope of his employment and was due certain benefits. The trial court specifically found, however, that a subsequent injury on December 29, 1986, was not compensable in that the employee failed to meet the burden of proving that the second

549 F.Supp. 1368 (1982) Cheryl Anne RENFROE, Plaintiff, v. Dr. John KIRKPATRICK, Superintendent, Piedmont City Schools; Sherman D. Meers, Principal, Southside Elementary School; and Piedmont City Board of Education, Defendants. Civ. A. No. CV81-PT-1234-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, E.D. November 5, 1982. *1369 Ja

COSTELLO, Judge: Appellant was tried and convicted on 4 December 1974 on charges of possession and sale of marihuana in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934. The approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge and confinement at hard labor for two years. Issues were joined by appellate counsel on 9 December 1975, and we affirmed the findings and sentence on 20 January 1976 [u

194 Ga. App. 397 (1990) 391 S.E.2d 13 DUE WEST ASSOCIATES, INC. v. RENFROE MINING & GRADING COMPANY, INC. A89A1820. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 5, 1990. Alston & Bird, G. Conley Ingram, Peter M. Degnan, John E. Stephenson, Jr., for appellant. Robert E. Flournoy III, for appellee. BEASLEY,

ROSENN, Circuit Judge: For at least the last twenty-five years, the Decatur City Board of Education (Board)1 has required all male students to complete successfully a course of military instruction, known as the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC), as a necessary condition for completion of the tenth grade and for graduation from Decatur High School. The State Board of Education, which has es

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, Paula Renfroe and Marsha Smith, brought this action in federal district court in Missouri to recover damages allegedly sustained as a result of their in útero exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES). All but one of the defendant drug companies joined in a motion for summary judgment, contending that the plaintiffs’ causes of action were barred by the applicable statutes of limitatio

910 So.2d 624 (2005) Dillon RENFROE, Appellant v. Brad BERRYHILL d/b/a J & B Mill Store, Appellee. No. 2003-CA-01453-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. March 1, 2005. *625 Yancy B. Burns, Jackson, attorney for appellant. *626 Andy Lowry, Oxford, Bradley E. Dean, John E. Gough, Jr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 96-CA-01043-SCT JENNIFER RENFROE GUTHRIE v. TIMOTHY RENFROE AND MATTIE AND FRED RENFROE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/13/96 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. THOMAS L. ZEBERT COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CHANCERY ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JOHN R. REEVES ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: JOHN M. MOONEY, JR. NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - CUSTODY DISPOSITION:

130 Ga. App. 621 (1974) 204 S.E.2d 317 BITUMINOUS CASUALTY COMPANY et al. v. RENFROE. 48699. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued October 4, 1973. Decided January 24, 1974. *627 Van Gerpen & Bovis, John M. Bovis, William M. Schiller, for appellants. Savell, Williams, Co

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-21-00268-CV JASON PAUL WHITE, DDS, APPELLANT V. JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JOHN DOE, A MINOR CHILD, AND JOHN DOE II, AS NEXT FRIEND OF MINOR CHILDREN, JOHN DOE III AND JOHN DOE IV, APPELLEES

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ALAN LARES, FOR PUBLICATION March 26, 2025 Plaintiff-Appellant,

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, dissenting in part. |TI dissent from the majority’s treatment of bystander damages and its conclusion that the general damages award . of $6,600,000 was excessive. The issue of a separate cap is indeed before us despite the lack of a specific pleading or lack of its inclusion in the jury instructions or the jury verdict form. The majority’s rigid adherence to hyp

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Pike County, in equity. The case involves the construction of a property settlement agreement made a part of a divorce decree. Mary Walters Scherf, appellant, and J. W. Renfroe, one of the appellees, were formerly husband and wife. In December, 1948, their marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce rendered by the Pike County circuit court, in equity, on a bill filed by the wife. A property settlement agreement was inco