Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John T. Cook”
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA ________________________________ Case No. 5D2024-1531 LT Case No. 2024-CA-000203-A ________________________________ JOHN T. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. ALFRED COOK, derivatively on behalf of ADVANCED ORTHOPEDICS, P.A., Appellee. _______________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County. Michell
John W. Hankins v. Sarah T. Harrispublic domain
OPINION Michael Massengale, Justice Appellant John W. Hankins appeals from a grant of summary judgment in appellee Sarah T. Harris’s suit to quiet title to real property. Hankins claims that he has had an undivided one-half interest in the property since he foreclosed on a judicial lien and recorded an execution deed in 1980. Hankins also asserts counter
Estate of David E. Morgan, Jr. v. John Cookpublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Officer John Edwin Cook fatally shot David Eugene Morgan, Jr., after responding to a domestic disturbance at Morgan’s residence in Sedalia, Missouri. Morgan’s estate (the “Estate”) sued Cook pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging Cook used excessive force in violation of Morgan’s Fourth Amendment rights. After the completion of discovery, the district co
Cook v. Depingrepublic domain
WILLIAMS, J. | ,The plaintiff, Candace Cook, appeals a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, KaJohn Oil, L.L.C. The district court found that there was no showing that the landowner possessed actual knowledge of the dangerous animal. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS In March 2012, the plaintiff, Candace Cook, worked as a waitress at KK’s Restaurant, which was owned and
United States v. John T. Namey, Jr.public domain
*844 SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge. John T. Namey, Jr., appeals his conviction on eight counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 228(a) for “willfully failing] to pay a support obligation with respect to a child who resides in another State.” 1 We have j
Cook v. Asbestos Corp.public domain
HANS J. LILJEBERG, Judge. UOn November 8, 2011, plaintiffs, surviving spouse and children of Catherine Cook, filed a survival and wrongful death action, seeking damages against multiple defendants, including the insurers of Hunt *732Tool Company, American Employers Insurance Company, now part of One Beacon America Insurance Company, United States Fidelity and Guaranty
Bartesch v. Cookpublic domain
ANDREWS, District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint. (D.I. 16). On November 29, 2011, plaintiff Martin Bartesch filed this putative class action against defendants Brent M. Cook, Martin F. Petersen, John T. Perry, Richard D. Clayton, Nicholas Goodman, Kraig T. Higginson, Reynold Roeder, Barry Markowitz, Alan G. Perriton, James A. Herickhoff, and Scott E. Doughman, alleging
Cook v. Polakpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered November 28, 2006. The order denied the motion of defendants John C. Polak and Barbara A. Polak for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the complaint against defendants John C
T. S. v. County of Cookpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21‐3303 T. S., et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellees, v. COUNTY OF COOK, ILLINOIS and LEONARD DIXON, Defendants‐Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United Sta
In Re NATHANIEL C.T., Jason J.T. and Emerald S.T.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 10, 2013 Session IN RE: NATHANIEL C. T., JASON J. T. and EMERALD S. T. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 8948 G. Richard Johnson, Chancellor No. E2013-01001-COA-R3-CV-FILED-MARCH 17, 2014 This appeal concerns attorney’s fees. Two relatives (“Petitioners”) filed
American Express Bank, FSB v. Cook (In Re Cook)public domain
416 B.R. 284 (2009) In re John C. COOK and Melissa A. Cook, Debtors. American Express Bank, FSB, Plaintiff, v. John C. Cook and Melissa Cook a/k/a Melissa A. Cook, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-71839. Adversary No. 08-07077. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. August 28, 2009. *285 Matthew Huebsch
John T. Burks v. Amerian Cast Iron Pipe Companypublic domain
PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs-appellants are a group of retirees and their dependents who claim that American Cast Iron Pipe Company (“Cast *1335 Iron”) promised them health benefits, including free prescription drugs for life. They base their claims on oral representations, including a promise by Cast
Staples, Inc. v. Cookpublic domain
OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction The plaintiff, Staples, Inc., sued the State of Delaware to challenge a demand for payment made by the State under Delaware’s escheat law, 12 Del. C. §§ 1101, et seq. (the “Escheat Statute”). The State countersued, seeking a declaration that the sums demanded from Staples were proper
Hickory Heights Health & Rehab, LLC v. Cookpublic domain
N. MARK KLAPPENBACH, Judge This is an interlocutory appeal concerning the denial of a motion to compel arbitration. Appellants are Hickory Heights Health and Rehab, LLC; Central Arkansas Nursing Centers, Inc.; Nursing Consultants, Inc. d/b/a Professional Nursing and Rehabilitation Services; Tina Lynette Beard, individually and as nursing home administrator for Hickory Heights Health and Rehab, LLC; Michael S. Morton; and John Doe De
United States v. Cookpublic domain
594 F.3d 883 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Derrick COOK, Appellant. No. 09-3008. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued December 8, 2009. Decided February 12, 2010. *884 Mary M. Petras, Assistant Federal Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the
John Nawara v. Cook County Municipalitypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1393, 22-1430, 22-2395, & 22-2451 JOHN NAWARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. COOK COUNTY and THOMAS J. DART, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court
John Nawara v. Cook County Municipalitypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1393, 22-1430, 22-2395, & 22-2451 JOHN NAWARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. COOK COUNTY and THOMAS J. DART, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court
Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.public domain
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING at ECF. DOCS. 2344, 2345, & 2350 Kane, U.S. Senior District Judge A. Introduction After holding a Status Conference to determine the contours of remand, I directed the parties to brief the following two issues: “1) May a plaintiff who brings a Price-Anderson Act claim simultaneously pursue a freestanding state-law claim based on the same facts?”;
John Nawara v. Cook County Municipalitypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1393, 22-1430, 22-2395, & 22-2451 JOHN NAWARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. COOK COUNTY and THOMAS J. DART, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court
John Nawara v. Cook County Municipalitypublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-1393, 22-1430, 22-2395, & 22-2451 JOHN NAWARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. COOK COUNTY and THOMAS J. DART, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court