⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John T. Mitchell, III and Jessica M. Mitchell”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 11, 2013 Session AUBREY E. GIVENS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JESSICA E. GIVENS, DECEASED v. HARDIE V. SORRELS, III, M.D. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 2011-CV-169 John D. Wootten, Judge
In re Jessica M.public domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008-10-17 · Published · cited 0×
FIFTH DIVISION October 17, 2008 No. 1-06-2007 In re JESSICA M., a Minor ) Appeal from the (The People of the State Of Illinois, ) Circuit Court of ) Cook County. Petitioner-Appellee, )
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009-06-26 · Published · cited 1× · 26 So. 3d 1171; 2009 Ala. LEXIS 160; 2009 WL 1818653
The defendant below, Assurant, Inc. ("Assurant"), appeals from the trial court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration of the claims asserted against it by the plaintiff, Debra A. Mitchell. We reverse and remand. Facts and Procedural History In 2000, Mitchell purchased a manufactured home from Grand Luxor Homes, Inc. ("Grand Luxor"). In connection with the purchase, Mitchell received a comprehensive manufactured-home insurance policy issued by Am
Matter of Mitchellpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997-06-03 · Published · cited 15× · 485 S.E.2d 623; 126 N.C. App. 432; 1997 N.C. App. LEXIS 370
485 S.E.2d 623 (1997) In the Matter of Jessica MITCHELL, Juvenile. No. COA96-984. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 3, 1997. Pelfrey & Pelfrey by Melissa D. Pelfrey, Norlina, Attorney Advocate for the Guardian ad Litem. Frank W. Ballance, Jr. & Associates, P.A. by Garey M. Ballance, Warrenton, for petitioner-appellee. JOHN C. MARTIN, Judge.
In Re Josclyn M.public domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
12/16/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 1, 2024 IN RE JOSCLYN M., ET AL.1 Appeal from the Juvenile Court for White County No. 5227-JV2156 John Meadows, Judge
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
04/16/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 21, 2019 Session JESSICA OWENS, ET AL. v. GARY W. STEPHENS, D. O., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 1-80-18 Kristi M. Davis, Judge ___________________________________
T.M.H. v. D.M.T.public domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-12-23 · Published · cited 15× · 79 So. 3d 787
LAWSON, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I do not believe that binding legal precedent and the statutes we must follow permit the result reached by the majority. In explaining my reasons for reaching this conclusion, I will first discuss legal principles about which the majority and I seem to agree. The majority dismisses the cases setting forth these principles as distinguishable, and I generally
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2016-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0316 Filed December 21, 2016 MICHELLE GORDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. MITCHELL ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. d/b/a “CHEERS”, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Crawford County, John D. Ackerman, Judge. The plaintiff appeals the district court’s grant of summary
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-07-24 · Published · cited 3× · 2025 Ohio 2604
[Cite as Jessica v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., 2025-Ohio-2604.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jessica Short, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 24AP-423 (Ct. of Cl. No. 2023-00771JD) v. :
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 8, 2015 QUENTIN ELLIOTT LAWRENCE v. JESSICA MARCEL BROADNAX Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 110698 Hon. W. Neil Thomas, III, Judge No. E2015-00214-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JULY 31, 2015 This post-divorce appeal concerns the mother‟s notice of intent to relocate with the parties‟ minor
State v. Mitchellpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993-07-09 · Published · cited 6× · 855 P.2d 989; 18 Kan. App. 2d 530; 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 81
18 Kan. App. 2d 530 (1993) 855 P.2d 989 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MICHAEL J. MITCHELL, Appellant. No. 68,545 Court of Appeals of Kansas. Opinion filed July 9, 1993. Rick Kittel and Lucille Marino, assistant appellate defenders, and Jessica R. Kunen, chief appellate defender, for the appellant. Michael J. Cof
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED FEBRUARY SESS ION, 1999 April 21, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9804-CR-00133 ) Appellee, ) )
Supreme Court of the United States · 1993-06-11 · Published · cited 555× · 124 L. Ed. 2d 436; 113 S. Ct. 2194; 508 U.S. 476; 1993 U.S. LEXIS 4024
508 U.S. 476 (1993) WISCONSIN v. MITCHELL No. 92-515. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 21, 1993. Decided June 11, 1993. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN *477 Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. James E. Doyle, Attorney General of Wisconsin, argued the
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023-08-08 · Published · cited 4× · 533 P.3d 493; 2023 WY 77
THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 77 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2023 August 8, 2023 JESSICA GATES, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. “MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CONVERSE S-22-0286 COUNTY - ADVANCED MEDICINE. HOMETOWN CARE”, by
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010-07-26 · Published · cited 4× · 700 S.E.2d 168; 226 W. Va. 199
700 S.E.2d 168 (2010) Clarence T. COLEMAN ESTATE by Co-Administrators, Clarence COLEMAN and Helen M. Adkins, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. R.M. LOGGING, INC., A West Virginia Corporation; Clonch Industries, Inc., A West Virginia Corporation; and John Robinson, Individually, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 35139. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted March 3,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-04-28 · Published · cited 228× · 784 F.3d 1037; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 6977; 2015 WL 1903921
OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. This case requires the balancing of First Amendment rights with the right to cast a ballot that is both tabulated and undiluted. Those voting rights are achieved by safeguarding the integrity of the ballot box against fraud, intimidation, and other degradations of the electoral process. Plaintiffs John Russell
District Court, D. Kansas · 2007-02-04 · Published · cited 1× · 533 F. Supp. 2d 1119; 2007 WL 4867568
533 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2007) Teresa D. CULP, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY M. SIFERS, M.D., PA. and Timothy L. Sifers, as the Executor of the Estate of Timothy M. Sifers, M.D., Defendants. Case No. 07-2103-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 4, 2007. *1120 Ashley L. Ricket, Leland F. Dempsey, Dempsey & Kingsland, P.C.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-06-13 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing Jun 13 2017, 11:12 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK estoppel, or the law of the case. Indiana Supreme Court
Idaho Court of Appeals · 2010-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 35705 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) 2010 Opinion No. 5 Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) Filed: January 26, 2010 v. ) ) Stephen W. Ke
Perez v. Texaspublic domain
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013-09-06 · Published · cited 4× · 970 F. Supp. 2d 593; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127226; 2013 WL 4784195
ORDER JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, ORLANDO L. GARCIA, and XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judges. After careful deliberation, the Court grants the parties’ request to amend their pleadings and denies Defendants’’ motion to dismiss the -2011 claims- as moot. All legal challenges and requests for injunctive, declaratory and equitable relief relating to .the 2011 and 2013 enacted plans will remain in this Court. T