Cases

958 F.Supp. 1151 (1997) Mr. and Mrs. Barry PICK v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. Civil Action No. 94-1729. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 27, 1997. *1152 *1153 *1154 Harry Hoskins, Frank B. Hayne, New Orleans, LA, Frank Sdoan, Covin

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ANA GLUHIC-POPOVIC and SENAD GLUHIC, Plaintiffs, C.A. No. N14C-06-158 PEL Vv. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: October 1, 2019 Upon Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment DENIED OPINION Robert J. Leoni, Esq. (Argued), Shelsby & Leoni, Stanton, Delaware 19804; Jeffrey Brinen, Esq. (Argued), Kutner Brinen, P.C., Denver, CO 80264; Shanin Specter, Esq., Lee B. Balefsky, Esq., Kline & Specter, P.C., Phi

TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel:* Before the Panel are three dockets involving allegations of defects in various models of pelvic surgical mesh products manufactured by three groups of manufacturers.1 Plaintiffs in almost twenty actions before the Panel have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize all MDL

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER P.K HOLMES, III, Chief Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Doc. 12) and brief in support; Defendant American Medical Systems, Inc.’s (“AMS”) Response in Opposition *902(Doc. 18); and Defendant Johnson Regional Medical Center’s (“JRMC”) Response in Opposition (Doc. 19). For the reasons di

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOHNSON & JOHNSON : HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS INC., : Plaintiff, : : v. : : Civil Action No.: 24-3188 (RC) ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.,

712 F.Supp.2d 885 (2010) AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., and Laserscope, Plaintiffs, v. LASER PERIPHERALS, LLC, Defendant. Civil No. 08-4798 (JNE/FLN). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 13, 2010. *891 Leland G. Hansen, Esq., Alejandro Menchaca, Esq., and Scott P. McBride, Esq., McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., an

JUDGMENT This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties. The Court has afforded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order of the District Court dismissing plaintiffs action with prejudice

411 F.Supp.2d 717 (2006) Darrell COWEN and Teressa Cowen, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 05-10307 BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. January 31, 2006. *718 James M. Hession, St. Charles, MI, for Plaintiffs. Michael J. Yockey, Kurt D. Yockey, Yockey, Yockey, Fa

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT L. WILKINS, United States Circuit Judge This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions, and the associated oppositions and replies. Defendants argue that no reasonable jury could find in favor of Plaintiff on any of her claims. The Court agrees

PER CURIAM. Medical Data Systems, Inc. (“appellant”) appeals from a final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee, American Professional Liability Underwriters, Inc. (“APLU”), on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. We find that the statute of limitations had not run and, as such, we reverse. Appellant, a nationwide medical debt collector, relied on Coastal Insurance Group and its agen

170 F.Supp.2d 594 (2001) Steven WARD, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 1:00CV150. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. October 23, 2001. *595 Steven Ward, pro se. Andrew S. Chamberlin, Ellis & Winters, LLP, Raleigh, NC, for Defendant. <

ORDER G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Deana Tuttle’s Motion Regarding Standard of Review, (Doc. 23). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is denied. BACKGROUND At issue in this case is an employee welfare plan’s denial of an employee’s claim for the reimbursement of medical payments. The crux of this Motion is to request t

598 F.Supp.2d 78 (2009) AMERICAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff, v. Charles E. JOHNSON,[1] Acting Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-00319 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 25, 2009. *79 Frederick Robinson, Fulbright &

MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. (“MRIS”) filed suit against Defendants American Home Realty Network (“AHRN”) and AHRN CEO Jonathan Cardella on March 28, 2012, alleging copyright infringement, violations of the Lanham Act, and tortious conversion and unjust enrichment. Doc. No. 1. MRIS’s claims are based on AHR

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 298 (2005) 35 Cal.4th 180 106 P.3d 958 VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Michelangelo DELFINO et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. S121400. Supreme Court of California. March 3, 2005. *302 Horvitz & Levy, Jon B. Eisenberg, Jere

875 F.Supp. 748 (1995) Charles BOKIS, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, d/b/a AMS, Defendant. No. CIV-94-53-C. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. January 23, 1995. *749 *750 Kevin McClure, Oklahoma City, OK, for plaintiff. Richard M. Eldrid

TAYLOR, J. Anna Johnson, individually and as personal representative of the estate of her husband, Gene Johnson, brought this wrongful death action against several hospitals, including defendants Boca Raton Community Hospital, Inc. and Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc. on theories of negligence and premises liability. Plaintiff sought recovery for injuries Mr. Johnson suffered as a result of his exposure to asbestos while worki

709 S.E.2d 188 (2011) 58 Va. App. 328 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES v. PATIENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, INC. Record No. 1634-10-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. May 31, 2011. Elizabeth A. McDonald, Special Counsel (Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; David E. Johnson, Deputy Attorney General; Kim F. Piner, Se

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Frank, Haley and Powell Argued at Richmond, Virginia VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES OPINION BY v. Record No. 1634-10-2 JUDGE ROBERT P. FRANK MAY 31, 2011 PATIENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, INC. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF