Cases

MEMORANDUM * Defendant-Appellant Calvin C. Johnson (“Johnson”) appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for second degree burglary under California state law. The sole claim before us is whether Johnson’s counsel was ineffective because she did not raise, at the time of trial, any issue regarding Johnson’s competence. Because we agree that the r

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

543 U.S. 829 JOHNSONv.CAREY, WARDEN. No. 03-10283. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Opinion issued February 20, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00407-CV ——————————— CAREY LYNN JOHNSON, Appellant V. JON

MEMORANDUM ** On May 1, 2007, the court denied appellant’s motion to reinstate this appeal without prejudice to renewal should appellant pay the fees for this appeal. On May 25, 2007, appellant paid the fees. Accordingly, the March 1, 2007 order dismissing this appeal for failure to prosecute is vacated. This appeal is reinstated. A review of the record and the appellant’s response to t

JUSTICE BAKER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Holly and Robert Labair sued Steve Carey and the Carey Law Firm (collectively Carey) for legal malpractice. Following this Court’s reversal and remand of a summary judgment order, Judge Edward P. McLean assumed jurisdiction in the case. Judge McLean retired afte

10/25/2016 DA 15-0621 Case Number: DA 15-0621 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 272 HOLLY LABAIR and ROBERT LABAIR, Individually and on behalf of DAWSON R. LABAIR, deceased minor child,

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-08-486-CV REGINALD DALE PETERS APPELLANT V. CAREY JOHNSON, CAREY JOHNSON APPELLEES D/B/A DISCOUNT BAIL BONDS AND DISCOUNT BAIL BONDS ------------ FROM THE

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

WILLIAMS, J. liA Caddo Parish Grand Jury returned an indictment charging the defendant, De-mond Carey, with second degree murder, in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30.1. Following a jury trial, he was found guilty of the responsive verdict of manslaughter. He was adjudicated a second-felony habitual offender and sentenced to serve 80 years at hard labor without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence. For the following re

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 7, 2002, Session HEATHER CAREY, Appellee v. MARGARET R. JOHNSON, Appellant Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion County No.14091, Thomas W. Graham, Judge _______________________________________________

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I join my colleagues insofar as they hold that the government may use evidence obtained from a valid wiretap until “officers know or should know they are listening to conversations outside the scope of the wiretap order.” Op. at 1098. But I dissent from Part IV of the opinion where the majority remands with instructions that the district court apply this rule to Carey’s cas

COMPTON, Justice. This is an action in replevin brought by appellee to recover a truck, or its value, alleged to be unlawfully detained by appellant, and for damages for the unlawful detention. The jury found that appellee was entitled to possession and awarded $600 damages for its. detention. The judgment on the verdict is here for review. The verdict disposes of all qu

*193SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BATCHELDER, C.J., joined. WISEMAN, D.J. (p. 219), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Imagine if a State imposed these restrictions on candidates for election to the legislature: (1) They “shall not identif

765 N.W.2d 396 (2009) Patrick William CAREY, Petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent. No. A08-0432. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 19, 2009. *397 Lawrence Hammerling, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Michael W. Kunkel, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant. Lori Swanson, Attorney General,

Opinion issued February 12, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00124-CV ——————————— IN RE CAREY LYNN JOHNSON, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM * Petitioner Cecil Carr appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. Petitioner contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel (1) failed to file a notice of appeal and/or consult with Petitioner regarding his right to appeal, and (2) failed to obtain Petitioner’s medical records for his competency hearing. We have jurisdiction under

588 S.E.2d 434 (2003) 263 Ga. App. 109 CAREY v. The STATE. No. A03A1030. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 9, 2003. Certiorari Denied January 12, 2004. *435 Sexton & Morris, Ricky W. Morris, Jr., Joseph S. Key, Stone Mountain, for appellant. Gwendolyn R. Keyes, Solicitor-Ge

PER CURIAM: The appeal by the plaintiffs in this case raises a number of issues involving the district court’s order awarding attorney’s fees, and the cross-appeal questions the district court’s order denying defendant’s motion for sanctions. The standard of review applicable to all of the issues is abuse of discretion, and the discretion afforded the district court in these matters is considerable. We have read the briefs a