Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Johnson v. Perez”
Johnson v. Perezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Prince Johnson is an African-American man who was employed for approximately seven months — from April 2, 2006, until November 11, 2006 — as a Veterans Employment Specialist in the Veterans Employment and Training Services (“VETS”) division of the Department of Lab
Johnson v. Perezpublic domain
23 A.3d 542 (2011) JOHNSON v. PEREZ. Nos. 221 & 222 WAL (2011). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. June 15, 2011. Disposition of Petition for Allowance of Appeal Denied.
Teodoro Perez v. Dina Renee Johnsonpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00082-CV ___________________________ TEODORO PEREZ, Appellant V. DINA RENEE JOHNSON, Appellee On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-288801-16 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr
Teodoro Perez v. Dina Renee Johnsonpublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-19-00082-CV TEODORO PEREZ, Appellant § On Appeal from the 96th District Court § of Tarrant County (096-288801-16) V. § September 17, 2020 DINA RENEE JOHNSON, Appelle
Matter of Perez v. Johnsonpublic domain
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered October 23, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, denied the petition of petitioner-respondent seeking modification of a prior custody order granting respondent-petitioner sole legal and primary physical custody of the subject children. It is her
Johnson v. Perezpublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Prince Johnson v. Thomas Perezpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD. PILLARD, Circuit Judge: Prince Johnson, an African American temporary employee of the U.S. Department of Labor, sued the Department, claiming that it dismissed him from his position as a Veterans Employment Specialist because of his race in violation of Title VII. The district court saw grounds to dou
Perez v. Johnsonpublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered September 26, 2008, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Lamont E. Johnson on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury w
BILL OF COSTS TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTEENTH DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN No. 15-24-00125-CV Jeremiah Perez v. Hill College, Johnson County and Joshua Independent School District (No. DC-T202300308 IN 249TH DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY) TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID
MANDATE The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00125-CV Jeremiah Perez, Appellant v. Hill College, Johnson County and Joshua Independent School District, Appellees Appealed from the 249th District Court of Johnson County. (Trial Court No. DC- T202300308). Opinion delivered Per Curiam. TO THE 249TH DISTRICT
February 20, 2025 JUDGMENT The Fifteenth Court of Appeals NO. 15-24-00125-CV JEREMIAH PEREZ, Appellant V. HILL COLLEGE, JOHNSON COUNTY AND JOSHUA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellees ________________________________ This c
PEREZ, DARIO R. v. JOHNSON, KARIN C.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered October 15, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied petitioner’s objection to the order of the Support Magistrate. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding
Perez v. Abbottpublic domain
ORDER ON PLAN H358 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This Order addresses Plaintiffs’ statutory and constitutional claims against Plan H358, enacted by the 83rd Texas Legislature in 2013. The following Plaintiffs assert claims against Plan H358: The Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force1 (limited to HD90), MALC,2 th
Perez v. Johnsonpublic domain
122 F.3d 1067 Perezv.Johnson NO. 96-20135 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 31, 1997 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. ,No. 2 Affirmed.
State v. Perez-Espinosapublic domain
JOHNSON, J. *1120Defendant/Appellant, Viusqui Perez-Espinosa, appeals his convictions and sentences for second degree murder and obstruction of justice from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division "K". For the following reasons, we vacate Defendant's sentences and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perezpublic domain
NUMBER 13-06-252-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ___________________________________________________________________
State v. Perez-Espinosapublic domain
JOHNSON, J. *1120Defendant/Appellant, Viusqui Perez-Espinosa, appeals his convictions and sentences for second degree murder and obstruction of justice from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division "K". For the following reasons, we vacate Defendant's sentences and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Perez v. Statepublic domain
KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge | Appellant Juan Perez was convicted of three counts of rape committed against K.W., who was ten or eleven years old when the offenses were committed. Mr. Perez was sentenced to three concurrent twenty-five-year prison terms. On appeal, Mr. Perez argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion for dire
Perez v. Avilespublic domain
OPINION & ORDER JOHN F. KEENAN, United States District Judge Petitioner Alexis Perez, a non-citizen who is currently in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging DHS’s authority to detain him *330without bond. For the reasons set forth below,
Perez, Eduardopublic domain
*87ALCALÁ, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KELLER, P.J., and HERVEY and COCHRAN, JJ., joined. I join the majority opinion. I write separately to highlight the general concept that is applicable here that sitting on your rights or waiving them may cause you to lose them. I agree with the majority opinion that, by sitting on his rights in failing